This was the heading on an article in The Washington Post, Thursday, May 23
I draw attention to it because of the word "enslaved."
During the past few years I have noticed an irritating change in politically correct English. I suspect that in the near future it may be dangerous not to use this change.
Properly speaking, these 1,800 congressmen did not enslave anyone. Neither did the slave traders who brought the Negro slaves across the Atlantic Ocean.
The Negro slaves were not enslaved by whites at all. They were enslaved by other Negroes and sold to whites.
By writing, "More than 1,800 congressmen enslaved Black people," rather than More than 1,800 congressmen owned black slaves," one ignores the complicity of Negroes in Negro slavery.
I draw attention to it because of the word "enslaved."
During the past few years I have noticed an irritating change in politically correct English. I suspect that in the near future it may be dangerous not to use this change.
Properly speaking, these 1,800 congressmen did not enslave anyone. Neither did the slave traders who brought the Negro slaves across the Atlantic Ocean.
The Negro slaves were not enslaved by whites at all. They were enslaved by other Negroes and sold to whites.
By writing, "More than 1,800 congressmen enslaved Black people," rather than More than 1,800 congressmen owned black slaves," one ignores the complicity of Negroes in Negro slavery.