In the grander scheme of grand schemes, it hasn't gone unnoticed that the creationers offer no evidence to support their claims to supernatural creation.In the grand scheme of things there is still more evidence of creation than of evolution.
Or not. Whales were not created. They evolved from earlier species of mammals.Everything that you believe evolved had to be created.
Evolutionist always say we evolved from apes! ? Then why are the apes still here? God created man in his image. Just like man can now clone animals, practice in vitro fertilization. I hear white people were grafted by a scientist called Jacob in Africa many thousands of years ago. Google his name.
This is the kind of question a child asks when hearing about evolution for the first time.
Well I am not a child , but I know that animals were being grafted and made in ancient Egypt hundreds of thousands of years ago. I also know that Black people did not evolve from apes , by way of mitochondria DNA studies who proved that we all have the same mitochodria DNA from a Black women in Kenya that lived 150,000 years ago. Maybe whites evolved from apes or Orangutans. She was a human woman, not an Ape.
''I know that animals were being grafted and made in ancient Egypt hundreds of thousands of years ago.''
That's right you aren't. So you have NO excuse for being this abjectly ignorant of this topic. Nor should anyone feel compelled to spoonfeed an adult any of the material. Go learn something.
No you don't. This is the science section, take this bizarre nonsense to another section.
It is relevant that the idea of evolution by far pre-dated Darwinian theory about evolution. Because it means that people believed evolution was a possible or likely explanation for the existence of species long before the Darwinian idea of speciation via natural selection. Therefore, it is possible to accept one without accepting the other.
Hopefully, the above cleared up that erroneous thinking on your part.
It means the same thing that Richard Dawkins meant when he spoke about it.
Oh?
Yep. That's what creationists do alright.
Which is you changing the topic. So, irrelevant.
Be specific now and cite for us how life came to be?
Why? If I were offended by sock puppetry, I would stroke out every time I logged onto a political forum.
If you had beaten me so soundly, you would simply walk away with your victory.
So you are claiming that the worlds foremost opponent of creationism and intelligent is wrong when he talks about apparent design?
You did not "probe" my idea of how life spread on Earth. You copied and pasted some works that you certainly did not read yourself.
Who sent the meteor that came right in time for the smart little rodent proto-mammals to be saved from the far less intelligent, but ravenously hunting dinosaurs?
Different topic. We both believe in abiogensis. You just believe it was a magic trick by a sky daddy, and I don't.
Of course, I am an ape just as you are.
Maybe yes, maybe no, but you are still an ape that evolved from a different apes.
Yes, just as a star can come from a "not star".
It was another ridiculous claim by you and false.
Because you keep trying to foist your BS on others even though I have refuted cleanly.
Yes, and I showed how with the twin ID. I was really over then, you had to ignore it.
I answered everything in my own words and showed an understanding of the topic you'll Never have throughout.
