More Proof the skeptics are WINNING!!

[ScienceRocks]

indeed

I think 1.5c of total warming inline with Christy, spencer, and Monckton. At least this is what they thought not to long ago.

Not what you have been posting up to now.

You are a hard core AGW cultist and your past posts prove that.

I love posting different things here to get a response

 

[jon_berzerk]

Hey West.....saw this today and almost pissed my pants. Of course, I knew it had to become an instant gay MSPAINT skook Photobucket Classic!!!

yeah the "polar vortex" is nothing new

it used to be called the Alberta Clipper

and has happened many many a times

LOL,

big difference between alberta clipper and polar vortex.

A polar vortex (also known as a polar cyclone, polar low, or a circumpolar whirl[1] ) is a persistent, large-scale cyclone located near either of a planet's geographical poles. On Earth, the polar vortices are located in the middle and upper troposphere and the stratosphere. They surround the polar highs and lie in the wake of the polar front. These cold-core low-pressure areas strengthen in the winter and weaken in the summer due to their reliance upon the temperature differential between the equator and the poles.[2] They usually span less than 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) in which the air is circulating in a counter-clockwise fashion (in the Northern Hemisphere). As with other cyclones, their rotation is caused by the Coriolis effect.

The Arctic vortex in the Northern Hemisphere has two centers, one near Baffin Island and the other over northeast Siberia.[1] In the southern hemisphere, it tends to be located near the edge of the Ross ice shelf near 160 west longitude.[3] When the polar vortex is strong, the Westerlies increase in strength. When the polar cyclone is weak, the general flow pattern across mid-latitudes buckles and significant cold outbreaks occur.[4] Ozone depletion occurs within the polar vortex, particularly over the Southern Hemisphere, which reaches a maximum in the spring.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_vortex

I bet you attack this too.

it has been happening all throughout history

it is not anything new

take the The Children's Blizzard of 1888 for example

when single digits reached far into Texas and all across the south

ironically that happened almost to the date of this event

 

[skookerasbil]

LMAO........more AGW nutter-ass losing........

Turns out, the polar vortex phenomenon happens all over the solar system since forever.........





Polar vortices across the solar system | The Planetary Society



Looking forward to some space photos of galactic SUV's from Saturn!!!!!

 

[skookerasbil]

Hey Matthew >>>>

 

[skookerasbil]

OK......heres just another from the long list of examples proving that not only are the skeptics winning, but proving that every other thread on this forum is essentially irrelevant. Oh sure, I suppose it is interesting to debate the science on the internet but in the real world, the science is having zero impact on the energy scene. Which begs the question. Is it really anything more than an internet hobby? All the evidence points to......hobby and nothing more.

Consider THIS.......just another of the long, long list of links presented in this thread clearly proving that in the real world, not only are the skeptics winning, they are starting to DOMINATE.




Green dream on ice as 'coal frenzy' grips Europe and renewables lose their attraction

GRAHAM LLOYD |
The Australian |
January 11, 2014 12:00AM

IT'S been a black Christmas for green thinkers as Germany, the world leader in rooftop solar and pride of the renewable energy revolution has confirmed its rapid return to coal. After scrapping nuclear power, Germany's carbon dioxide emissions are back on the rise as the country clamours to reopen some of the dirtiest brown coalmines that have been closed since the reunification of east and west.


Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian









Oh......PS.....Germany BY FAR is the most green thinking country ( look at the polls) but there comes a point where even the greenest thinking person gets sick and tired of getting whacked over the head with mega=expensive electricity costs of green energy. To green energy, the most green of people have basically said, "**** you!!" to green energy.........and Im laughing.

 

[jon_berzerk]

OK......heres just another from the long list of examples proving that not only are the skeptics winning, but proving that every other thread on this forum is essentially irrelevant. Oh sure, I suppose it is interesting to debate the science on the internet but in the real world, the science is having zero impact on the energy scene. Which begs the question. Is it really anything more than an internet hobby? All the evidence points to......hobby and nothing more.

Consider THIS.......just another of the long, long list of links presented in this thread clearly proving that in the real world, not only are the skeptics winning, they are starting to DOMINATE.




Green dream on ice as 'coal frenzy' grips Europe and renewables lose their attraction

GRAHAM LLOYD |
The Australian |
January 11, 2014 12:00AM

IT'S been a black Christmas for green thinkers as Germany, the world leader in rooftop solar and pride of the renewable energy revolution has confirmed its rapid return to coal. After scrapping nuclear power, Germany's carbon dioxide emissions are back on the rise as the country clamours to reopen some of the dirtiest brown coalmines that have been closed since the reunification of east and west.


Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian









Oh......PS.....Germany BY FAR is the most green thinking country ( look at the polls) but there comes a point where even the greenest thinking person gets sick and tired of getting whacked over the head with mega=expensive electricity costs of green energy. To green energy, the most green of people have basically said, "**** you!!" to green energy.........and Im laughing.

a few years back the head of the energy in the UK warned the people

that if they chose to go green

that need to get used to sitting in the dark and cold frequently

 

[skookerasbil]

OK......heres just another from the long list of examples proving that not only are the skeptics winning, but proving that every other thread on this forum is essentially irrelevant. Oh sure, I suppose it is interesting to debate the science on the internet but in the real world, the science is having zero impact on the energy scene. Which begs the question. Is it really anything more than an internet hobby? All the evidence points to......hobby and nothing more.

Consider THIS.......just another of the long, long list of links presented in this thread clearly proving that in the real world, not only are the skeptics winning, they are starting to DOMINATE.




Green dream on ice as 'coal frenzy' grips Europe and renewables lose their attraction

GRAHAM LLOYD |
The Australian |
January 11, 2014 12:00AM

IT'S been a black Christmas for green thinkers as Germany, the world leader in rooftop solar and pride of the renewable energy revolution has confirmed its rapid return to coal. After scrapping nuclear power, Germany's carbon dioxide emissions are back on the rise as the country clamours to reopen some of the dirtiest brown coalmines that have been closed since the reunification of east and west.


Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian









Oh......PS.....Germany BY FAR is the most green thinking country ( look at the polls) but there comes a point where even the greenest thinking person gets sick and tired of getting whacked over the head with mega=expensive electricity costs of green energy. To green energy, the most green of people have basically said, "**** you!!" to green energy.........and Im laughing.

a few years back the head of the energy in the UK warned the people

that if they chose to go green

that need to get used to sitting in the dark and cold frequently

and putting a shotgun in their mouth when they opened their electric bill!!!


The k00k left never think costs matter.......but in the end, they are everything. Green energy is just another in the long, long list of examples of good intentions not equating with results........stupid ******* morons. Almost daily I get hysterical thinking about the profound level of naïve.

 

[skookerasbil]

The makey-uppey science of the climate crusaders reared its ugly head yet again last week when the k00k contingent blamed the polar vortex on global warming.

But according to a Princeton PHd physicist, its a bunch of baloney >>>



Award-winning Princeton University Physicist Dr. Will Happer rejected the media and some scientists claims that the record U.S. cold is due to man-made global warming. Happer, explained the science in an exclusive interview with Climate Depot.

“Polar vortices have been around forever. They have almost nothing to do with more CO2 in the atmosphere,” Happer said in an exclusive interview with Climate Depot.


Princeton Physicist Dr. Will Happer refutes claims that global warming is causing record cold: ?Polar vortices have been around forever. They have almost nothing to do with more CO2 in the atmosphere? | Climate Depot



What is the typical response by the hyper-nutter climate k00ks?


"Well......he's not really a scientist"!!!!

 

[Abraham3]

You should look into the background of Will Happer. He's not really a scientist on whom you'd bet your bottom dollar.

 

[skookerasbil]

You should look into the background of Will Happer. He's not really a scientist on whom you'd bet your bottom dollar.

yeah but 30,000 other scientists say the "man made" part is a bunch of hooey!! I'll put $30,000 on that!


Anyway........either way, it really doesn't matter. Fossil fuel domination for decades and decades tells me all I need to know and makes a slam dunk on this thread!!

 

[orogenicman]

Happer's expertise in climate science = 0.

 

[Abraham3]

yeah but 30,000 other scientists say the "man made" part is a bunch of hooey!! I'll put $30,000 on that!

THAT is a bunch of hooey.

Anyway........either way, it really doesn't matter. Fossil fuel domination for decades and decades tells me all I need to know and makes a slam dunk on this thread!!

That point is irrelevant to the topic of this thread.

 

[flacaltenn]

Yep.. attack the messenger.. disregard the message. This guy once took a free Exxon cap from a filling station.... bunch of Borg compnents here. its all we got SKOOKS. Cant we put a warmers wanted on Craigs List?

 

[Abraham3]

Do you know of a list of 30,000 scientists who say "man-made" warming is a bunch of hooey?

 

[HenryBHough]

Do you know of a list of 30,000 scientists who say "man-made" warming is a bunch of hooey?

No.

Most of them prefer not to use words like "hooey".

If you'd accept a more scientific term, for example: "bullshit", then it seems you might have your choice of lists.

 

[mamooth]

So did you know the list of 30,000 scientists who say "man-made" warming is bullshit is bullshit, or was your reasoning ability not sufficient to see through that scam?

(An inability to reason correctly causes people to be an easy mark for both conservative scams and denialist scams, hence why those two cults overlap so much.)

 

[flacaltenn]

HenryBH.. I'm leaving you in charge of the tub full of babies. Try not to lose any.. But no one goes to bed until they're clean..

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You should look into the background of Will Happer. He's not really a scientist on whom you'd bet your bottom dollar.

97% = x/y

You never gave me x or y.
Why are you running away from your claim?

 

[skookerasbil]

Do you know of a list of 30,000 scientists who say "man-made" warming is a bunch of hooey?

LoSe


30,000 Anti-Global Warming Scientists Can?t Be Wrong

 

[ScienceRocks]

Personally, I'd develop fusion until it can effectively replace fossil fuels.

But that would probably take another 50 billion to get a big enough system and a few trillion to build the plants.

Solar and wind isn't going to do it.