More Proof Of Their Gender Confusion

Three frauds and failures: Darwin, Marx, and Freud.

But, not of course, if you went to government school and never thought for yourself.
I guess you graduated school in 1920? You may want to catch up on the last 100 years of science.
 
Is that what your psychologist told you?


You know so very little, you dope......I bet you didn't know that Freud was a charlatan.....like the Democrats.




Valuable to the collectivists is Freud’s claim that people are not endowed with free will. The idea is that childhood experiences determine what we are and what we do.
Hence, the importance of government school to the totalitarians.




Here's what they don't want you to know:

“Freud was a charlatan, …He was a quack who routinely proscribed measuring to patients, then wrote fictional papers bragging about his phenomenal results. In one 1896 lecture, he claimed that by uncovering childhood sexual trauma he had healed some eighteen patients, he later admitted he hadn’t cured anyone.”
Ben Shapiro, “The Right Side Of History,” p. 166



Basing their ideas on science and reason.....is Freud 'science'?
Nope.....
Who says not?
He does.


“Freud's claims skirted falsifiability, the quality of being testable, a bedrock of the scientific method. Resistance to his lurid suggestions, he argued, meant only that he was onto something; heads I win, tails you really do want to fellate your father. He also conspired to excommunicate any analyst from the movement who dared to subject his ideas to critical scrutiny.

As Freud wrote to a close colleague, he was only "fantasizing, interpreting, and guessing" toward "bold but beautiful revelations." He claimed: "I am actually not at all a man of science, not an observer, not an experimenter, not a thinker. I am by temperament nothing but a conquistador."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ad0011a4f70f


Three frauds and failures: Darwin, Marx, and Freud.

But, not of course, if you went to government school and never thought for yourself.
Psychology as a science had a very bad beginning. Freud indeed was a charlatan and his protege, Carl Jung, was worse, for having a sexual relationship with a mentally unstable patient.

Experimental behavioral psychology is a science, but most of psychology is much more art than science. The problem with "respecting science," is that science is an activity for humans, who are fallible, some more than others.

Fauci is the best current example. The media sensed that he was in disagreement with Trump, and therefore elevated him to the embodiment of science, which he began to actually believe. Giving Fauci this kind of infallible status was a great way to avoid discussing things like whether cloth masks actually benefitted anyone, or whether N95 masks were more effective.
 
Psychology as a science had a very bad beginning. Freud indeed was a charlatan and his protege, Carl Jung, was worse, for having a sexual relationship with a mentally unstable patient.

Experimental behavioral psychology is a science, but most of psychology is much more art than science. The problem with "respecting science," is that science is an activity for humans, who are fallible, some more than others.

Fauci is the best current example. The media sensed that he was in disagreement with Trump, and therefore elevated him to the embodiment of science, which he began to actually believe. Giving Fauci this kind of infallible status was a great way to avoid discussing things like whether cloth masks actually benefitted anyone, or whether N95 masks were more effective.

It was a Democrat who claimed it.
A good rule is to assume everything he posts is wrong or a bald-faced lie.
 
Back
Top Bottom