Mollie Hemingway and Victoria Collier agree, our election process needs fixing

[JoeB131]

what a pathetic predictable load of hogwash you spew 24-7 with the Black crap like you know something nobody else can even think 1% true you farm Hog. Just SHUP fool.

Sorry, man, I'm white.

Also, duly noted you couldn't refute the point. Not even sure why you do this.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

SHUP dufus. That was the first time using out of control Mail in ballots flooded out like home depot ads you ignorant black backed tree skunk.

The 2020 election is over and Trump got his ass handed to him, get over it.

 

[Independent thinker]

She's absolutely right.

Ditto

 

[airplanemechanic]

The 2020 election is over and Trump got his ass handed to him, get over it.

The 2020 selection is over and Bribem was installed like a toilet. And ironically, both are full of shit.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

The 2020 selection is over and Bribem was installed like a toilet. And ironically, both are full of shit.

Are you mad that the country flushed that POS Trump.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Are you mad that the country flushed that POS Trump.

No, I'm mad that demofacists managed to install a toilet in the white house that can't even remember how or when his own son died and who has been ruled incompetent to stand trial but can somehow run the country.

 

[Blaster]

Are you mad that the country flushed that POS Trump.

Now we have senile Joe Biden.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

No, I'm mad that demofacists managed to install a toilet in the white house that can't even remember how or when his own son died and who has been ruled incompetent to stand trial but can somehow run the country.

Kind of like when Trump not knowing Nikki Haley from Nancy Pelosi.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Now we have senile Joe Biden.

Yep, after we got rid of dumbass Donald Trump.

 

[Blaster]

Yep, after we got rid of dumbass Donald Trump.

You voted for Trump and now you are a Biden voter?

 

[johnwk]

The 2020 election is over and Trump got his ass handed to him, get over it.

Will you ever give up your obsession with Trump and focus on present-day security weaknesses with our election system?

The irrefutable fact is, mail-in ballots have two, significant and inherent security weaknesses. There is no practical way to scrutinize a mail-in ballot when counted, to verify that it was actually filled out, and the choices made thereon, were by a qualified voter who allegedly was issued the ballot, and, there is a loss of chain of custody from the time a mail-in ballot is received by a theoretically legitimate recipient of a mail-in ballot, to the time when that mail-in ballot is counted.

Mail-in ballots should only be allowed for those who have a legitimate excuse-based need, e.g., see PA’s Constitution (ARTICLE VII, ELECTIONS, § 14. Absentee Voting

By limiting mail-in voting to a legitimate excuse-based need, the total number of mail-in ballots would be reduced to a fraction of what is now the case, and in so doing, even though the opportunity for vote stealing and mail-in ballot fraud would still exist, its effect on an election would be greatly reduced by the reduction in actual mail-in ballots allowed. Perhaps that is why so many democratic run countries have banned mail-in voting, LINK, and returned to paper ballots, strict voter ID and in-person voting as a rule.

JWK

The troubling truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

 

[JoeB131]

Will you ever give up your obsession with Trump and focus on present-day security weaknesses with our election system?

The irrefutable fact is, mail-in ballots have two, significant and inherent security weaknesses. There is no practical way to scrutinize a mail-in ballot when counted, to verify that it was actually filled out, and the choices made thereon, were by a qualified voter who allegedly was issued the ballot, and, there is a loss of chain of custody from the time a mail-in ballot is received by a theoretically legitimate recipient of a mail-in ballot, to the time when that mail-in ballot is counted.

Again, the Census Bureau relied on mail-in forms for years. In 2020, they finally upgraded to on-line.

The IRS relied on mail-in tax forms for years... While there is some fraud there, mostly the people who filed their taxes were the ones who filed their taxes.

There's really no good reason NOT to allow mail in balloting, other than you don't like that it makes it easier for poor people to vote.

The troubling truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

It ain't 1941 anymore.

The reality is that mail-in voting is great. When you get a ballot, you probably have a pretty good idea on who you want to vote for for President of Governor, but when it gets to the down-ballot races, not so much. If you get your ballot a month before, you can take the time to research these candidates and what they stand for and their records.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

JoeB owns Johnwk on this issue.

Mail-in ballots are fine.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Will you ever give up your obsession with Trump and focus on present-day security weaknesses with our election system?

The irrefutable fact is, mail-in ballots have two, significant and inherent security weaknesses. There is no practical way to scrutinize a mail-in ballot when counted, to verify that it was actually filled out, and the choices made thereon, were by a qualified voter who allegedly was issued the ballot, and, there is a loss of chain of custody from the time a mail-in ballot is received by a theoretically legitimate recipient of a mail-in ballot, to the time when that mail-in ballot is counted.

Mail-in ballots should only be allowed for those who have a legitimate excuse-based need, e.g., see PA’s Constitution (ARTICLE VII, ELECTIONS, § 14. Absentee Voting

By limiting mail-in voting to a legitimate excuse-based need, the total number of mail-in ballots would be reduced to a fraction of what is now the case, and in so doing, even though the opportunity for vote stealing and mail-in ballot fraud would still exist, its effect on an election would be greatly reduced by the reduction in actual mail-in ballots allowed. Perhaps that is why so many democratic run countries have banned mail-in voting, LINK, and returned to paper ballots, strict voter ID and in-person voting as a rule.

JWK

The troubling truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

Sounds like you are the one who needs to give up on Trump. How is it not ONE court in this country found all this voter fraud Trump Humpers are crying about.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Ain't no voter fraud ever found,

MAGA's mind ain't any sound.

 

[johnwk]

Mail-in ballots targeted again, in vote stealing operation.​

.
.
Once again mail-in ballot voting opens the door and becomes the target of an election fraud operation. See: Political Organizer and Former President of City Council of Atlantic City Charged with Submitting Fraudulent Mail-In Ballots

February 1, 2024

Many of the mail-in ballots collected by Callaway or his subordinates were ultimately cast in the names of people who have confirmed that they did not vote in the 2022 General Election – either in person or by submitting a mail-in ballot – and that they did not authorize Callaway, his subordinates, or anyone else, to cast ballots for them.

Here is a LINK to the actual complaint.


Let me once again emphasize that mail-in ballots ought to be limited to a legitimate excuse-based need, and by doing so the total number of mail-in ballots would be reduced to a fraction of what is now the case, and even though the opportunity for vote stealing and mail-in ballot fraud would still exist, its effect on an election would be greatly reduced by the reduction in actual mail-in ballots allowed.

Allowing no-excuse mail-in ballot voting has opened the door for countless vote stealing and government perpetrated vote fraud operations. Why is the allowance of no-excuse mail-in ballot voting being forced upon the people in so many States without the people’s consent via a constitutional amendment?

JWK

The troubling truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Nothing will change with mail in ballots.