Minneapolis Police Chief: "It has absolutely become an unlawful assembly."

[Marener]

In a period of mass civil unrest? That's not reasonable.

Did they suspend the constitution? If not, then it's not reasonable.

The mobs just want to share their FEELINGS?

That's bullshit. Try again, dumbass.


WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE CONSTANT VERBAL ABUSE?

The purpose is irrelevant. All that matters is that it's constitutionally protected.

 

[Marener]

Stalking is cause enough. You loons have turned up the ultra-violence and your droogs insist on interfering with federal law enforcement and the millions of innocent citizens who don't want to be bothered by your hissy fit, hence ICE, being the ever benevolent organization they are, protect the average citizen from your constant annoyances. That is exactly what I voted for.

Quote the law that makes it illegal to follow them around. It doesn't exist. That's why he was released without any charges.

Did you vote for ICE to routinely assault and attack people who have done nothing but exercise their constitutional rights?

 

[Rawley]

If people need to leave over throwing rocks, seems to me those shooting women and unconstitutionally breaking into homes should also.

WOW. Rationalizing throwing rock at the police now? Wow.

 

[80zephyr]

It doesn’t matter. You’ll tell yourself anything.

So will you, it appears.

 

[Correll]

Did they suspend the constitution? If not, then it's not reasonable.

Prosecution of infractions require some level of judgement. Ignore the fact that the event happened during a period of civil unrest would be retarded.

The purpose is irrelevant. All that matters is that it's constitutionally protected.

If the purpose is irrelevant, then there is no harm in admitting it.

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE CONSTANT VERBAL ABUSE WE HEAR IN ALL OF THESE VIDS?

 

[Bitterhook]

It has been an unlawful assembly from the jump.

Blocking thoroughfares and rousting innocent hotel guests isn't "protesting".

One's right to freedom of speech does not mean they have the right to impose their freedoms on others through obstruction or force, because at no point does the freedom of speech mean anyone is required to listen to them.

 

[80zephyr]

It's hardly an outlandish assumption, and there's zero evidence to support any other conclusion.

It is an assumption based on possibly not getting all the information.

 

[22lcidw]

And if it's just that the cop was pissed off, then attacking the man is a violation of the constitution and felony assault.

The purpose of the verbal abuse? To tell ICE how the people feel about them. It's protected by the first amendment.

you are threatening to kill Christians in churches now. The feds are moving to slow on this. If it means some of your insurrectionists get killed, then so be it. You have to wonder why we do not know who the paid insurrectionists are. We have a several year history of this easily.

 

[Rogue AI]

Quote the law that makes it illegal to follow them around. It doesn't exist. That's why he was released without any charges.

Did you vote for ICE to routinely assault and attack people who have done nothing but exercise their constitutional rights?

He was released without charges because the Trump administration doesn't want to ruin his life, just stop him from interfering with federal law enforcement and allowing innocent citizens to carry on with their lives absent your hissy fit.

 

[Marener]

He was released without charges because the Trump administration doesn't want to ruin his life, just stop him from interfering with federal law enforcement and allowing innocent citizens to carry on with their lives absent your hissy fit.

Of course they want to ruin his life.

They aren't charging these people because they never intended to charge them. They're just using force and intimidation to get what they want.

That's why you have now law to back your claim up.

 

[Marener]

It is an assumption based on possibly not getting all the information.

If all you have is hoping there's some unseen evidence, despite no indication of any such evidence, then you're just telling yourself a story.

 

[Marener]

Prosecution of infractions require some level of judgement. Ignore the fact that the event happened during a period of civil unrest would be retarded.

Since the constitution hasn't been suspending, calling it a period of civil unrest is totally meaningless. The same laws and rights still apply. These are the same laws and rights being violated by the authoritarian thugs in ICE who know they will never face any repercussions for doing so.

If the purpose is irrelevant, then there is no harm in admitting it.

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE CONSTANT VERBAL ABUSE WE HEAR IN ALL OF THESE VIDS?

Not sure why you're asking me. One, I'm not doing it. Two, you already seem to know and aren't saying. I don't have any need to play your game of "tell me what I'm thinking".

The people don't like ICE and they're telling them. It's constitutionally protected. That's all you need to know. Nothing else is relevant.

 

[80zephyr]

Of course they want to ruin his life.

They aren't charging these people because they never intended to charge them. They're just using force and intimidation to get what they want.

That's why you have now law to back your claim up.

Most people arrested during the Floyd riots weren't charged. What was their intent?

 

[martybegan]

Please provide a link that says an immigration detainer gives ICE the right to enter a private residence without a judicial warrant.

Another persistent misconception is that ICE must have a judge-signed warrant to arrest someone. That is false. Immigration officers are authorized by statute to make warrantless arrests for immigration violations under 8 U.S.C. § 1357. ICE also executes administrative warrants, which are issued internally by the agency rather than by a judge.

Administrative warrants, authorized under the immigration detention framework in 8 U.S.C. § 1226, are lawful instruments allowing ICE to take individuals into custody for civil immigration proceedings even though they are issued by the agency rather than a court. These warrants are commonly used to formalize civil immigration custody, such as when ICE decides to detain someone for removal proceedings after an arrest or while the person is already in government custody.

ICE’s authority to arrest someone in public does not come from an administrative warrant; it comes directly from 8 U.S.C. § 1357 when the statutory conditions are met. Administrative warrants instead provide the legal basis for continuing to hold the person in civil immigration detention while removal proceedings move forward.

Judicial warrants are required only in specific circumstances, most notably when ICE seeks to forcibly enter a private residence without consent. Outside the home, including during public arrests, vehicle stops, and consensual encounters, ICE officers may act under their statutory authority without a warrant.

So they would need a warrant to forcibly enter someone's home. They don't need one to knock and ask for the person.

What Federal Immigration Enforcement Can and Cannot Do | Military.com

Show me where they have entered without a warrant.

 

[Rogue AI]

Of course they want to ruin his life.

They aren't charging these people because they never intended to charge them. They're just using force and intimidation to get what they want.

That's why you have now law to back your claim up.

You couldn't be more wrong. Facing federal felony charges would have a major impact on this idiot's life. That isn't what the administration wants, it wants to round up illegal aliens, as per ICE's mandate.

 

[Marener]

So they would need a warrant to forcibly enter someone's home. They don't need one to knock and ask for the person.

What Federal Immigration Enforcement Can and Cannot Do | Military.com

Show me where they have entered without a warrant.

You're crawfishing. Anyone can knock on anyone's door and ask for anything, really.

The problem is a cop threatening to arrest someone for obstruction because they won't let them in.

Climbing a fence to get into a house without a warrant is clearly illegal.

Video captures Donna family's detainment by alleged federal agents

A Donna man is seeking answers after surveillance video captured a group of men in tactical gear jumping his fence and detaining his parents. ICE says it is currently reviewing the case.

www.krgv.com

 

[Marener]

You couldn't be more wrong. Facing federal felony charges would have a major impact on this idiot's life. That isn't what the administration wants, it wants to round up illegal aliens, as per ICE's mandate.

Yet again, just telling yourself pathetic excuses to deny the obvious.

They didn't have a problem trying to prosecute sandwich guy.

 

[martybegan]

You're crawfishing. Anyone can knock on anyone's door and ask for anything, really.

The problem is a cop threatening to arrest someone for obstruction because they won't let them in.

Climbing a fence to get into a house without a warrant is clearly illegal.

Video captures Donna family's detainment by alleged federal agents

A Donna man is seeking answers after surveillance video captured a group of men in tactical gear jumping his fence and detaining his parents. ICE says it is currently reviewing the case.

www.krgv.com

Then the police will be reprimanded, but the fact is the people are still here illegally.

 

[Marener]

Most people arrested during the Floyd riots weren't charged. What was their intent?

It's true. Police commonly use illegal mass arrests to shut down free speech.

 

[martybegan]

It's true. Police commonly use illegal mass arrests to shut down free speech.

The only side right now shutting down free speech in the Western World is the left.

Just look at Europe.