Minneapolis Police Chief: "It has absolutely become an unlawful assembly."

Then the police will be reprimanded, but the fact is the people are still here illegally.
HA!

Why would the Trump administration "reprimand" anyone for executing their policy agenda?

Let's talk qualified immunity. Shouldn't they be prosecuted for illegal entry and assault? It's pretty clear you can't jump someone's fence and arrest them on their own property.
 
HA!

Why would the Trump administration "reprimand" anyone for executing their policy agenda?

Let's talk qualified immunity. Shouldn't they be prosecuted for illegal entry and assault? It's pretty clear you can't jump someone's fence and arrest them on their own property.

Now you are adding in assault, so your dishonesty is clear.

Arresting someone isn't assault.
 
Yet again, just telling yourself pathetic excuses to deny the obvious.

They didn't have a problem trying to prosecute sandwich guy.
Of course, sandwich guy did throw something at federal agents. It sent a message. That was the point. You loons really don't understand how badly this could go for you. Instead, you spit in the face of Trump's benevolence and keep pushing the envelope. FAFO is coming for you folks.
 
"There are individuals throwing fireworks at police officers, individuals throwing ice, rocks, other projectiles at police officers. Um, it is well past the line, and people need to leave."


The mayor of Minneapolis was standing right next to him when he said it. It seems that these Democrats now recognize the difference between a peaceful protest and a riot. Did they see a new internal poll?

Minnesota citizens and law enforcement are exhausted from the Democrat fueled chaos. If they had real leaders they would be doing everything in their power to stop it, but instead they continue pouring gas on the fire. In other words SSDD.
 
Of course, sandwich guy did throw something at federal agents. It sent a message. That was the point. You loons really don't understand how badly this could go for you. Instead, you spit in the face of Trump's benevolence and keep pushing the envelope. FAFO is coming for you folks.
There's no charge because there's no crime.

Just thuggish cops using force and intimidation to send a message.
 
Trump's administration has been very opposed to free speech.


The speech isn't being stopped, it's being countered.

Meanwhile from your side:

Riley Gaines 'ambushed and physically hit' after Saving Women's Sports speech at San Francisco State
 
Now you are adding in assault, so your dishonesty is clear.

Arresting someone isn't assault.
It is assault when the arrest is unlawful.

Is jumping the fence and throwing someone to the ground a lawful exercise of power?
 
The speech isn't being stopped, it's being countered.

Meanwhile from your side:

Riley Gaines 'ambushed and physically hit' after Saving Women's Sports speech at San Francisco State
A lawsuit isn't counter speech. It's threat and intimidation.

ICE is routinely using force against people who speak out against them.

If someone hit Riley Gaines, I have no problem with them being prosecuted. But you're totally okay with ICE assaulting protestors who are engaging in free speech.
 
It is assault when the arrest is unlawful.

Is jumping the fence and throwing someone to the ground a lawful exercise of power?

I'll wait until I see the government's side of the story.
 
Quote the law that makes it illegal to follow them around. It doesn't exist. That's why he was released without any charges.

Did you vote for ICE to routinely assault and attack people who have done nothing but exercise their constitutional rights?

In compliance with decisions of the US Supreme Court through various cases, the ACLU has identified several actions and forms of speech that are not constitutionally protected under Freedom of Speech in the First Amendment, and these include:

Obscenity (with some restrictions)
Defamation
Incitement
Harassment
Threats

One cannot impose their freedom on others, nor properly exercise their freedom through obstruction, incitement, harassment, or the threat of force. Here is the ACLU's primer on the First Amendment, so read it, learn it, and please stop talking out of your ass.
 
A lawsuit isn't counter speech. It's threat and intimidation.

ICE is routinely using force against people who speak out against them.

If someone hit Riley Gaines, I have no problem with them being prosecuted. But you're totally okay with ICE assaulting protestors who are engaging in free speech.

No, it's saying you done fucked up legally.

ICE doesn't do shit to people just speaking, they arrest people interfering with them.

Not free speech, actions that interfere with their lawful duties.

You probably jerked off to Gaines getting hit by some he/she.
 
There's no charge because there's no crime.

Just thuggish cops using force and intimidation to send a message.
Nonsense, interfering with federal law enforcement is a crime. Just remember you loons hunted down every single person that was within a few blocks of that January thing you whine about. The feds can do the same to every single one of you loons that show up to riots or neighborhoods to interfere.
 
No, it's saying you done fucked up legally.

ICE doesn't do shit to people just speaking, they arrest people interfering with them.

Not free speech, actions that interfere with their lawful duties.

You probably jerked off to Gaines getting hit by some he/she.
That's just what you're telling yourself because you don't give a shit what they're doing as long as they're fulfilling the agenda you want.

Plenty of examples have been provided, and you have plenty of excuses to ignore it.
 
15th post
Nonsense, interfering with federal law enforcement is a crime. Just remember you loons hunted down every single person that was within a few blocks of that January thing you whine about. The feds can do the same to every single one of you loons that show up to riots or neighborhoods to interfere.
Following around ICE isn't interfering.
 
That's just what you're telling yourself because you don't give a shit what they're doing as long as they're fulfilling the agenda you want.

Plenty of examples have been provided, and you have plenty of excuses to ignore it.

"examples"

More "no camera on when the idiot interferes or attacks the officer" games.
 
Back
Top Bottom