Minneapolis Police Chief: "It has absolutely become an unlawful assembly."

The camera is off the man who is targetted, until he is targetted. We cannot see what is the cause.

I guess you are trying to imply that the man did nothing?


But, you didn't show him doing nothing before hand. YOu are just implying and assuming it.

For all I know, he did something before the video, or while the camera was aimed off to the side.

We all know this trick now, and why we don't fall for it anymore.
 
It is exactly what is happening. I know you think ICE is walking around with a warrant for a rapist to deport but they aren’t. They are walking up to motorists filling up their gas at a gas station and demanding papers because they are brown.



They have warrants for people, but as Homan said, if they find more illegals when going after the one with the warrant, they will be detained as well.

Another video missing the before and after context.
 
Lawlessness leads to lawlessness. Trump has set up the board. Protesters will be playing accordingly. I have zero doubts violence will ensue. People wont be pushed around. We are a government OF the people. It is power given, not taken.
And stupidity breeds stupidity. You are living proof of that
 
The camera is off the man who is targetted, until he is targetted. We cannot see what is the cause.

I guess you are trying to imply that the man did nothing?


But, you didn't show him doing nothing before hand. YOu are just implying and assuming it.

For all I know, he did something before the video, or while the camera was aimed off to the side.
He’s standing there filming and gets shoved and tackled by a group of your thugs.

Why do you ask for videos when you’ll just make anything up to justify the assault? It’s pointless. You can’t convince someone who makes shit up.
 
Grabbing brown people off the streets and demanding their papers is unconstitutional. None are suspected of a crime outside of their skin color or accent. Trump has thrown out the useless piece of paper called the constitution. It doesn’t apply anymore. I suggest the government is now defunct as it has violated the principles of its founding. I will be curious what rises from the ashes of democracy.
Interesting how illegals are brown when being deported but when they commit crimes they're counted as white...
 
Who decides if a direction is unlawful?
I’ll tell you who it isn’t.

ICE.

Let’s say law enforcement asks to come in your house and you say no because they have no warrant.

The law enforcement replies, if you don’t let me in, I’ll go get a warrant an arrest you for obstruction.

How do you feel about that?
 
He’s standing there filming and gets shoved and tackled by a group of your thugs.

Why do you ask for videos when you’ll just make anything up to justify the assault? It’s pointless. You can’t convince someone who makes shit up.

He's FILMING? oH, so, somewhere is the film he was shooting and you could have shown THAT, which would include the full context and what actually happened.

But instead the clip that is circulated is the one that only starts AS the chase starts.

Why do you think that is? Why not SHOW, him "doing nuthin", to really drive home that point?


And again, you claim that he is just standing there filming, but you don't show it. THe camera doesn't focus on him until the chase starts. He might have punched a cop in the face, while the camera was off of him, for all we know.
 
Nope! They didn't sneak in. It would be different if they actually snuck in. But that is not what happened.

They were allowed in by our government, to seek asylum. They are not undocumented, they are documented as asylum seekers....reporting to authorities once a month.... This admin is reversing what our govt did, after the okay, after the fact....and are blaming the immigrants for our government's official position of letting them in to seek asylum in the immigration courts.

That's a rotten move...unAmerican. That's a back stabbing by our present government....and just isn't right....whether one agrees with president Biden's policy on it or not...imo....if one differs they can hasten the court process, to remove those not qualifying sooner....but they were promised the court process, and should get it.
What the hell are you smoking or snorting?

Damn do you actually believe the crap you posted? You sound like Brandon's Press Secretary Little Red Lying Hood

FB_IMG_1723011530418.webp
FB_IMG_1723796857041.webp
 
I’ll tell you who it isn’t.

ICE.

Let’s say law enforcement asks to come in your house and you say no because they have no warrant.

The law enforcement replies, if you don’t let me in, I’ll go get a warrant an arrest you for obstruction.

How do you feel about that?

Doesn't sound like something that would stand up in court.

Also, I would hope the judge is not just a rubber stamp for warrent requests.

remember how the fbi had to lie to get warrents to investigation Trump and "russia gate"?

Judges generally want a REASON, to give a warrent.
 
The camera is off the man who is targetted, until he is targetted. We cannot see what is the cause.

I guess you are trying to imply that the man did nothing?


But, you didn't show him doing nothing before hand. YOu are just implying and assuming it.

For all I know, he did something before the video, or while the camera was aimed off to the side.


It doesn’t matter. You’ll tell yourself anything.
 
I’ll tell you who it isn’t.

ICE.

Let’s say law enforcement asks to come in your house and you say no because they have no warrant.

The law enforcement replies, if you don’t let me in, I’ll go get a warrant an arrest you for obstruction.

How do you feel about that?

The left supported going after people over obstruction with Russia Russia Russia and Jan 6....
 
Doesn't sound like something that would stand up in court.

Also, I would hope the judge is not just a rubber stamp for warrent requests.

remember how the fbi had to lie to get warrents to investigation Trump and "russia gate"?

Judges generally want a REASON, to give a warrent.
It’s not meant to stand up in court. It’s meant to threaten and intimidate people into giving up their constitutional rights.

It has nothing to do with a judge. It has everything to do with coercion.

Is it okay with you?
 
15th post
It’s not meant to stand up in court. It’s meant to threaten and intimidate people into giving up their constitutional rights.

It has nothing to do with a judge. It has everything to do with coercion.

Is it okay with you?

You don't have a Constitutional right to interfere with law enforcement.
 
Elections do not allow for our Constitutional rights to get tossed.
Keep crying in your Cheerios, fool.

No constitutional rights have been violated that the ACLU and others are not defending.

You don't have a constitutional right to flee law enforcement who have instructed you to exit your vehicle and endager them in the process.

You don't have a constitutional right to interfere with law enforcement in general.

Tell me about your constitutional right to invade a church in the middle of a service and disrupt it for everyone. It might exist. But as most will tell you, only the most abhorrent of human being (such as yourself) would actually exercise it.

Up yours.
 
Lawlessness leads to lawlessness.
A sad excuse for the left-wing perverts in Minn.

The mayor should be summarily tarred and feathered. Now that is some lawlessness I could sign up for. :finger3:
 
Back
Top Bottom