Minneapolis Police Chief: "It has absolutely become an unlawful assembly."

[OODA_Loop]

That’s what the citizen said happened and we don’t have anything that would contradict it.

When they want after Renee Good, their first move was to rip her out of the car, so we have plenty of evidence to the contrary.

By the time this man reached the parking lot, ICE had decided to arrest him as they had previously warned they would do if he continued to follow them

Then he followed and parked near to them.

Renee Good would have likely encountered the same detainment and verification had she not hit the officer with her car.

 

[Correll]

That’s what the citizen said happened and we don’t have anything that would contradict it.

When they want after Renee Good, their first move was to rip her out of the car, so we have plenty of evidence to the contrary.

By the time this man reached the parking lot, ICE had decided to arrest him as they had previously warned they would do if he continued to follow them.

The problem is that it’s not illegal to follow them around, which means the arrest was unjustified and illegal.

Huh. So you did have more tape. You just refused to show it. ..

Interesting choice.

 

[Marener]

Then he followed and parked near to them.

Renee Good would have likely encountered the same detainment and verification had she not hit the officer with her car.

Your claim was that ICE wouldn’t immediately attempt to use force, because it’s too dangerous.

Renee Good instructs us that you’re half right. They would immediately attempt the use of force and it is dangerous.

Following and parking near them is not obstructing in any way shape or form. The arrest has no legal justification.

 

[Delldude]

If you’re going to deny what is obvious from the video, then present a reasonable alternative explanation.

A reasonable explanation would come from what had transpired prior to the officers actions.

A selectively edited clip wouldn't work in a court of law.

That’s not detaining. That’s an arrest.

Well he was detained IAW the law.

When they want after Renee Good, their first move was to rip her out of the car, so we have plenty of evidence to the contrary.

She was ordered three times to get out of the car.

Liar

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

A reasonable explanation would come from what had transpired prior to the officers actions.

A selectively edited clip wouldn't work in a court of law.


Well he was detained IAW the law.

She was ordered three times to get out of the car.

Liar

.

I counted four times that she was ordered to get out of the car.

She must have graduated from a Minnesota Learing Center.

.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Your claim was that ICE wouldn’t immediately attempt to use force, because it’s too dangerous.

Renee Good instructs us that you’re half right. They would immediately attempt the use of force and it is dangerous.

Following and parking near them is not obstructing in any way shape or form. The arrest has no legal justification.

They instructed her to get out of the car she refused - that was the initiating action.

Following and parking close can rise to a threat and is hindering their operations it can be cause for detainment and verification of intent.

 

[Correll]

Your claim was that ICE wouldn’t immediately attempt to use force, because it’s too dangerous.

Renee Good instructs us that you’re half right. They would immediately attempt the use of force and it is dangerous.

Following and parking near them is not obstructing in any way shape or form. The arrest has no legal justification.

It clearly is. When you are moving around a lot of vehicles, obstructing the road is obstructing the operation.

HORN BLOWING, is obstruction. THey are trying to make it difficult to communicate, and sowing confusion and raising the tension, in an already dangerous situation.


SHe was looking to cause disruption, hopefully to cause a violent incident.

She won! She got what she wanted!!

A big day for the movement!!

If the country ever goes TURD WORLD, as you guys want, you can put up statues, to remember her work.

 

[Delldude]

The arrest has no legal justification.

He he he.....he was never arrested.

 

[Marener]

It's disgusting to me to see a supposedly full grown man, acting in such a craven and cowardly way.

And you, buddy, YOUR the one that is actively aruging to IGNORE the context of the situation.

YOU are the one pushing a FALSE NARRATIVE.

Not only can everyone see that, but you know it too.



You guys are good at playing this system you have in place. Provoke a response, then use the response to generation a false narrative.

Like MLK, talkign shit about being shocked that the police attacked his marchers.

The plan was to get the marchers attacked. THey WENT to where they would get attacked, because they NEEDED headlines and photos to mobilize sympathetic whites.

HE WAS LYING.

And you ******* leftards, are still using the same playbook. Start shit, then cry like a little girl about the shit you started.


I think it is well past time we stop falling for it. Time to just arrest your asses, and throw your asses in jail.

You want to arrest people for exercising constitutionally protected rights, which makes you an authoritarian thug.

 

[Correll]

A reasonable explanation would come from what had transpired prior to the officers actions.

A selectively edited clip wouldn't work in a court of law.


Well he was detained IAW the law.

She was ordered three times to get out of the car.

Liar

The leftard lied? What a shock.

They are pieces of shit.

 

[Marener]

He he he.....he was never arrested.

What do you call being ripped out of your car, thrown to the ground, shackled and held for 8 plus hours?

 

[Delldude]

What do you call being ripped out of your car, thrown to the ground, shackled and held for 8 plus hours?

Detained in accordance with the law.

 

[Marener]

They instructed her to get out of the car she refused - that was the initiating action.

Following and parking close can rise to a threat and is hindering their operations it can be cause for detainment and verification of intent.

Following and parking close is not a threat and is not hindering.

Just because you feel threatened doesn’t make it so.

And he was not “detained”, he was arrested.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

What do you call being ripped out of your car, thrown to the ground, shackled and held for 8 plus hours?

.

Your murder cult's most recent lie.







.

 

[Lockback]

What do you call being ripped out of your car, thrown to the ground, shackled and held for 8 plus hours?

Justice?

 

[Delldude]

And he was not “detained”, he was arrested.

He was detained according to the law.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Following and parking close is not a threat and is not hindering.

Just because you feel threatened doesn’t make it so.

And he was not “detained”, he was arrested.

You don’t get to make the determination when it hinders and when it is viewed as a threat.

Do your thing but stay back.

 

[Marener]

Detained in accordance with the law.

Delusional.

 

[Marener]

You don’t get to make the determination when it hinders and when it is viewed as a threat.

Do your thing but stay back.

Facts matter. There is no factual basis to accuse him of obstructing anything.

Cops can’t turn protected rights into threats because they don’t like people exercising those rights.

 

[Marener]

.

Your murder cult's most recent lie.







.

Woodbury man says ICE detained him after he followed and recorded

He said he was placed in a holding cell in the Whipple Federal Building for nine hours after following ICE agents in his car.

www.twincities.com