Minneapolis Police Chief: "It has absolutely become an unlawful assembly."

[OODA_Loop]

Probably.

Then I am dispatching an officer to protect my operations.

Sound police doctrine.

Stay back and video all you want.

 

[Correll]

You’re such a child. Look how angry you are just because I don’t believe with your narrative.

It's disgusting to me to see a supposedly full grown man, acting in such a craven and cowardly way.

And you, buddy, YOUR the one that is actively aruging to IGNORE the context of the situation.

YOU are the one pushing a FALSE NARRATIVE.

Not only can everyone see that, but you know it too.

The only people I see celebrating her death are people on the far right.

You guys are good at playing this system you have in place. Provoke a response, then use the response to generation a false narrative.

Like MLK, talkign shit about being shocked that the police attacked his marchers.

The plan was to get the marchers attacked. THey WENT to where they would get attacked, because they NEEDED headlines and photos to mobilize sympathetic whites.

HE WAS LYING.

And you ******* leftards, are still using the same playbook. Start shit, then cry like a little girl about the shit you started.


I think it is well past time we stop falling for it. Time to just arrest your asses, and throw your asses in jail.

But you believe whatever you want, because all of your anger and outrage is used to justify your deep seated desire for authoritarianism.

 

[Delldude]

Can’t. I don’t have the video

Well I'll be damned.....

Which is why the vast majority of these people are released without charges.

Wouldn't have anything to do with a sanctuary city would it?

I will say they do it without legal justification.

18 USC 372

And if I did, you wouldn’t accept it anyway. You’d just make up more shit to justify it.

Tell ya what, try me.

 

[Marener]

Then I am dispatching an officer to protect my operations.

Sound police doctrine.

Stay back and video all you want.

You do what you want, but that doesn’t constitute obstruction.

An arrest has to be supported by facts particular to the individual. You can’t arrest a dude because you of a general belief that there are people who wish you harm.

 

[Marener]

Well I'll be damned.....


Wouldn't have anything to do with a sanctuary city would it?

18 USC 372

Tell ya what, try me

Ignore evidence presented and demand that which you know can’t be granted.

It’s not honest argument.

Because from the history of the right, we know that you’ll still deny it no matter what video is shown. Your side still believes the Capitol rioters were innocent.

 

[OODA_Loop]

You can’t arrest a dude because you of a general belief that there are people who wish you harm.

I can detain someone hindering and near my operations if I feel in my discretion has the potential to harm my officers especially if he has been following them.

 

[Delldude]

Ignore evidence presented and demand that which you know can’t be granted.

Until you provide such 'evidence' your argument is moot.

Your side still believes the Capitol rioters were innocent.

I wouldn't go that far.

It’s not honest argument.

Nothing with you is an honest argument.

 

[Delldude]

Ignore evidence presented and demand that which you know can’t be granted.

Like I said, your heroes only present 'highlights' and not the entire content, so who's problem is that?

 

[Lockback]

Until you provide such 'evidence' your argument is moot.


I wouldn't go that far.

Nothing with you is an honest argument.

Yep. Another intellectually dishonest leftist.

 

[marvin martian]

If people need to leave over throwing rocks, seems to me those shooting women and unconstitutionally breaking into homes should also.

Why didn't you ever mention that when actual criminals were doing those very things?

 

[Marener]

I can detain someone hindering and near my operations if I feel in my discretion has the potential to harm my officers especially if he has been following them.

There’s a possibility that they could justify detaining him, but they clearly went well beyond that. They had previously approached him and told him he can’t follow them, but that’s not the law.

Woodbury man says ICE detained him after he followed and recorded

He said he was placed in a holding cell in the Whipple Federal Building for nine hours after following ICE agents in his car.

www.twincities.com

They physically assaulted him, ripped him out of the car and arrested him, holding him for 8-10 hours before releasing him.

That’s not detaining. That’s an arrest. Arrest requires probable cause of a crime. There was no crime.

 

[Marener]

Like I said, your heroes only present 'highlights' and not the entire content, so who's problem is that?

There’s no such thing as sufficient evidence to someone who is totally desperate to ignore it.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Liar! What liberal protesters or rioters killed someone?

No one stabbed Jake Lang.

.

Lie harder, child.

.

 

[OODA_Loop]

They physically assaulted him, ripped him out of the car and arrested him, holding him for 8-10 hours before releasing him

This indicates to me he did not move when they instructed him.

 

[Marener]

This indicates to me he did not move when they instructed him.

When he parked in the lot near them, they did not instruct him. They surrounded his car, boxing him in, and ripped him out.

There’s no legal justification for that. He wasn’t obstructing. There’s no probable cause for the arrest.

 

[Delldude]

There’s no such thing as sufficient evidence to someone who is totally desperate to ignore it.

Again, you are stupid enough to accept what you perceive as proof of ICE violence provided by your heroes recording only the part that led up to being detained/arrested. It's presented that way to provide a biased view by selectively editing what really happened.

That's not proof of what caused their reaction.

 

[OODA_Loop]

When he parked in the lot near them, they did not instruct him. They surrounded his car, boxing him in, and ripped him out.

You don’t know that.

That is not the way police interactions typically go. They don’t want to go hands on if they don’t have to doing so puts them at personal risk.

Ask. Tell. Make.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

This indicates to me he did not move when they instructed him.

.

The leftist murder cult need to lear that Federal officers have the authority to give such orders.

.

 

[Marener]

You don’t know that.

That is not the way police interactions typically go. They don’t want to go hands on if they don’t have to doing so puts them at personal risk.

Ask. Tell. Make.

That’s what the citizen said happened and we don’t have anything that would contradict it.

When they want after Renee Good, their first move was to rip her out of the car, so we have plenty of evidence to the contrary.

By the time this man reached the parking lot, ICE had decided to arrest him as they had previously warned they would do if he continued to follow them.

The problem is that it’s not illegal to follow them around, which means the arrest was unjustified and illegal.

 

[Marener]

Again, you are stupid enough to accept what you perceive as proof of ICE violence provided by your heroes recording only the part that led up to being detained/arrested. It's presented that way to provide a biased view by selectively editing what really happened.

That's not proof of what caused their reaction.

If you’re going to deny what is obvious from the video, then present a reasonable alternative explanation.