Minneapolis Police Chief: "It has absolutely become an unlawful assembly."

[Delldude]

Or they are just worried they will lose control like they did after Geo. Floyd.

Nobody lost control, it was sanctioned.

 

[Delldude]

Then when they started burning white people's shit, "Wow, we really need to have some police reform!"

Quick check was mostly black businesses in mostly black neighborhoods.

 

[OODA_Loop]

You’ve refused before and have otherwise just made shit up, saying it’s illegal to park near an ICE agent.

Its delusional.

It is interference to be in close proximity of law enforcement operations and you are subject to detainment to verify your intent and identification.

Interfer with any law enforcement ops anywhere and you will find out.

 

[Marener]

It is interference to be in close proximity of law enforcement operations and you are subject to detainment to verify your intent and identification.

Interfer with any law enforcement ops anywhere and you will find out.

It’s delusional. The police can arrest ANYONE who comes within a, what, 20 foot radius? What’s the rule here?

 

[OODA_Loop]

It’s delusional. The police can arrest ANYONE who comes within a, what, 20 foot radius? What’s the rule here?

Delusional part of MN Law:

​

609.50 OBSTRUCTING LEGAL PROCESS, ARREST, OR FIREFIGHTING.​

(1) obstructs, hinders, or prevents the lawful execution of any legal process, civil or criminal, or apprehension of another on a charge or conviction of a criminal offense;

(2) obstructs, resists, or interferes with a peace officer while the officer is engaged in the performance of official duties;

Sec. 609.50 MN Statutes

www.revisor.mn.gov

 

[Marener]

Delusional part of MN Law:

​

609.50 OBSTRUCTING LEGAL PROCESS, ARREST, OR FIREFIGHTING.​

(1) obstructs, hinders, or prevents the lawful execution of any legal process, civil or criminal, or apprehension of another on a charge or conviction of a criminal offense;

(2) obstructs, resists, or interferes with a peace officer while the officer is engaged in the performance of official duties;

Sec. 609.50 MN Statutes

www.revisor.mn.gov

It’s delusional to assert that anyone in the mere vicinity of law enforcement can be arrested at any time for obstruction.

 

[Delldude]

You’ve been provided examples. You refuse to look or tell yourself that it’s not evidence because it wasn’t filmed for 7 angles, having studio quality audio with an hour of footage before, after the incident and even then you’ll come up with some other excuse.

It’s impossible to convince someone who is so desperate to deny it. You don’t have objectivity. You’re a hack.

Show the entire event not just what has been cherry picked.

 

[Delldude]

It’s delusional. The police can arrest ANYONE who comes within a, what, 20 foot radius? What’s the rule here?

18 USC 372

 

[Marener]

Show the entire event not just what has been cherry picked.

Remember when you guys said that Republicans releasing all the footage of the Capitol riot would prove the innocence of the rioters?

And it never actually happened.

It’s like that. You won’t believe anything you don’t want to believe. The footage is irrelevant.

 

[OODA_Loop]

It’s delusional to assert that anyone in the mere vicinity of law enforcement can be arrested at any time for obstruction.

Its your actions or unknown intent in close proximity not being in the mere vicinity.

Thousands of people film ice everyday but respect their operational space without incident. If your close enough where an officer has to deal with you - you’re too close.

 

[OODA_Loop]

It’s delusional. The police can arrest ANYONE who comes within a, what, 20 foot radius? What’s the rule here?

Most agencies train to a distance 21ft

Tuller Drill

Tueller Drill - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Delldude]

Remember when you guys said that Republicans releasing all the footage of the Capitol riot would prove the innocence of the rioters?

And it never actually happened.

It’s like that. You won’t believe anything you don’t want to believe. The footage is irrelevant.

You don't have to sidestep the question.

Show the entire event up to and including ICE intervention.

You insinuate ICE nilly willy attack and arrest people with no reason.

That is a bald faced lie.

 

[Marener]

Its your actions or unknown intent in close proximity not being in the mere vicinity.

Thousands of people film ice everyday but respect their operational space without incident. If you’re close enough where an officer has to deal with you - you’re too close.

To be guilty of obstructing, you actually have to do something obstructive.

Pulling into a parking stall near ICE in a grocery store is not obstructing.

 

[Marener]

You don't have to sidestep the question.

Show the entire event up to and including ICE intervention.

You insinuate ICE nilly willy attack and arrest people with no reason.

That is a bald faced lie.

Can’t. I don’t have the video. And if I did, you wouldn’t accept it anyway. You’d just make up more shit to justify it.

ICE will arrest people because they don’t like them. I won’t say it was “for no reason”. I will say they do it without legal justification.

Which is why the vast majority of these people are released without charges.

 

[OODA_Loop]

To be guilty of obstructing, you actually have to do something obstructive.

Pulling into a parking stall near ICE in a grocery store is not obstructing.

MN law also calls for hindering LE.

If you have been following ICE officers on a OP and pull in and park near me if I have to dispatch one of my officers on my discretion to interact with you - you are hindering my operations.

 

[Correll]

You elected a reality TV star who is so butt hurt about not winning the Nobel Prize that he’s threatening to invade a NATO ally over ******* Greenland.

You’re the reason we aren’t a serious country anymore.

I can see why you would rather change the subject away from the topic.

MARENER. BE A ******* A MAN. JUST ADMIT THAT MY POINT WAS CORRECT, AND THAT YOU AND THOSE PROFESSIONAL AGITATORS GOT WHAT YOU WERE WORKING TOWARDS AND YOU ARE ******* HAPPY THAT THAT WOMAN GOT KILLED, BECAUSE YOU CAN USE THAT TO ATTACK THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.

Use of force and arrests are only justified by the particularized facts about that individual. You’re implying a sort of collective punishment which is the stuff fascists do.

That woman was NOT an individual engaged in a action by herself. She was part of a large, professional, political operation designed to provoke a violent incident.

She got what she wanted.

I want her judged by her actions, as part of a criminal, if not treasonous organization.

YOU want to ignore the reality of the situation, to craft a FALSE NARRATIVE, so that you can LIE to the American people,

for the purposes of advancing your anti-American agenda.

 

[Marener]

MN law also calls for hindering LE.

If you have been following ICE officers on a OP and pull in and park near me if I have to dispatch one of my officers on my discretion to interact with you - you are hindering my operations.

But you don’t have to “dispatch one of your officers”. That’s just a choice.

There’s no hindering or interference. Just whiny cops.

 

[Marener]

I can see why you would rather change the subject away from the topic.

MARENER. BE A ******* A MAN. JUST ADMIT THAT MY POINT WAS CORRECT, AND THAT YOU AND THOSE PROFESSIONAL AGITATORS GOT WHAT YOU WERE WORKING TOWARDS AND YOU ARE ******* HAPPY THAT THAT WOMAN GOT KILLED, BECAUSE YOU CAN USE THAT TO ATTACK THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.




That woman was NOT an individual engaged in a action by herself. She was part of a large, professional, political operation designed to provoke a violent incident.

She got what she wanted.

I want her judged by her actions, as part of a criminal, if not treasonous organization.

YOU want to ignore the reality of the situation, to craft a FALSE NARRATIVE, so that you can LIE to the American people,

for the purposes of advancing your anti-American agenda.

You’re such a child. Look how angry you are just because I don’t believe with your narrative.

The only people I see celebrating her death are people on the far right.

But you believe whatever you want, because all of your anger and outrage is used to justify your deep seated desire for authoritarianism.

 

[OODA_Loop]

But you don’t have to “dispatch one of your officers”. That’s just a choice.

There’s no hindering or interference. Just whiny cops.

Do people want cause harm to ICE in MN?

 

[Marener]

Do people want cause harm to ICE in MN?

Probably.