Military Operations In Syria Have Officially Begun 2100est 22 September

[paulitician]

ISIS ISIS... they're coming to America and take over the world ! Stop ISIS decried the RW's, STOP ISIS !!!

RW boogeymen ..

Left Wingers have been decrying it too. They've been Warmongering for War with Syria for a long time. And now they have their War. it's a Left Winger in the White House doing all the bombing & killing right now.

Only an ignoramus would call The President a "Left Winger" or suggest the Left Wing has been calling for war with Syria.

Uh, your Dear Leader is a known Marxist-Wannabe. So of course he's a Left Winger. And the Left/Progressives have been pushing for Intervention/War in Syria for awhile. Check out this great John Stossel piece on Progressives/Neocons and War...

 

[mudwhistle]

Remember Americans, after the ISIS Boogeyman is gone, they're gonna invent a new one. Will you fall for the next scam too? How many more times will you fall for the old 'We Must Unite To Defeat Evil' scam?

Well, since Obama hit a group call "Corzi" or something, a group we never heard of before, I guess he's inventing a Boogeyman on his own.

They always have a Boogeyman for the People to fear & hate. After ISIS, they'll just invent a new one. Permanent War is the goal for the Ruling-Class Globalist Elites.

Maybe. As long as someone keeps declaring war on us we might as well stay prepared.

 

[paulitician]

Remember Americans, after the ISIS Boogeyman is gone, they're gonna invent a new one. Will you fall for the next scam too? How many more times will you fall for the old 'We Must Unite To Defeat Evil' scam?

Well, since Obama hit a group call "Corzi" or something, a group we never heard of before, I guess he's inventing a Boogeyman on his own.

They always have a Boogeyman for the People to fear & hate. After ISIS, they'll just invent a new one. Permanent War is the goal for the Ruling-Class Globalist Elites.

Maybe. As long as someone keeps declaring war on us we might as well stay prepared.

If there is no Boogeyman, they'll invent one. Gotta keep the people in fear. They're much more likely to support any Intervention/War being proposed. The only question now is, who or what will their next Boogeyman be?

 

[mudwhistle]

Remember Americans, after the ISIS Boogeyman is gone, they're gonna invent a new one. Will you fall for the next scam too? How many more times will you fall for the old 'We Must Unite To Defeat Evil' scam?

Well, since Obama hit a group call "Corzi" or something, a group we never heard of before, I guess he's inventing a Boogeyman on his own.

They always have a Boogeyman for the People to fear & hate. After ISIS, they'll just invent a new one. Permanent War is the goal for the Ruling-Class Globalist Elites.

Maybe. As long as someone keeps declaring war on us we might as well stay prepared.

If there is no Boogeyman, they'll invent one. Gotta keep the people in fear. They're much more likely to support any Intervention/War being proposed. The only question now is, who or what will their next Boogeyman be?

Mankind.
Climate change is our fault don't you know......

 

[paulitician]

Remember Americans, after the ISIS Boogeyman is gone, they're gonna invent a new one. Will you fall for the next scam too? How many more times will you fall for the old 'We Must Unite To Defeat Evil' scam?

Well, since Obama hit a group call "Corzi" or something, a group we never heard of before, I guess he's inventing a Boogeyman on his own.

They always have a Boogeyman for the People to fear & hate. After ISIS, they'll just invent a new one. Permanent War is the goal for the Ruling-Class Globalist Elites.

Maybe. As long as someone keeps declaring war on us we might as well stay prepared.

If there is no Boogeyman, they'll invent one. Gotta keep the people in fear. They're much more likely to support any Intervention/War being proposed. The only question now is, who or what will their next Boogeyman be?

Mankind.
Climate change is our fault don't you know......

Oh yeah, they're using fear of the Global Warming Boogeyman to impose more Government oppression on the People. The People are screaming for less Government, not more. But fear is a very powerful tool. People tend to go along with almost anything if you scare em enough.

 

[mudwhistle]

Well, since Obama hit a group call "Corzi" or something, a group we never heard of before, I guess he's inventing a Boogeyman on his own.

They always have a Boogeyman for the People to fear & hate. After ISIS, they'll just invent a new one. Permanent War is the goal for the Ruling-Class Globalist Elites.

Maybe. As long as someone keeps declaring war on us we might as well stay prepared.

If there is no Boogeyman, they'll invent one. Gotta keep the people in fear. They're much more likely to support any Intervention/War being proposed. The only question now is, who or what will their next Boogeyman be?

Mankind.
Climate change is our fault don't you know......

Oh yeah, they're using fear of the Global Warming Boogeyman to impose more Government oppression on the People. The People are screaming for less Government, not more. But fear is a very powerful tool. People tend to go along with almost anything if you scare em enough.

They've pretty much lost the fight for that. Their credibility is shot because of their hypocrisy and their dishonesty.

 

[Wry Catcher]

ISIS ISIS... they're coming to America and take over the world ! Stop ISIS decried the RW's, STOP ISIS !!!

RW boogeymen ..

Left Wingers have been decrying it too. They've been Warmongering for War with Syria for a long time. And now they have their War. it's a Left Winger in the White House doing all the bombing & killing right now.

Only an ignoramus would call The President a "Left Winger" or suggest the Left Wing has been calling for war with Syria.

Uh, your Dear Leader is a known Marxist-Wannabe. So of course he's a Left Winger. And the Left/Progressives have been pushing for Intervention/War in Syria for awhile. Check out this great John Stossel piece on Progressives/Neocons and War...

It's no wonder you're brain washed; do you really believe ths 'interview' wasn't a rehershed spin on reality?

Do you have evidence that President Obama is a "Marxist-Wannabe"? He's only known as one, if he is, in far right circles of ignoranct extremists.

As for this 'interview' it is in sum and in total a fallacy, the Appeal to Authority, and the authority in this instance seems to have an agenda - both political and personal. Anyone who attend a University knows that Profs rarely, if ever, express the certainty of their convictions as did this clown. My guess is he's pushing a book which he has tried to get published and failed. Better he offer it to the Ministry of Truth or its representative who posts here, PoliticalChic.

 

[paulitician]

They always have a Boogeyman for the People to fear & hate. After ISIS, they'll just invent a new one. Permanent War is the goal for the Ruling-Class Globalist Elites.

Maybe. As long as someone keeps declaring war on us we might as well stay prepared.

If there is no Boogeyman, they'll invent one. Gotta keep the people in fear. They're much more likely to support any Intervention/War being proposed. The only question now is, who or what will their next Boogeyman be?

Mankind.
Climate change is our fault don't you know......

Oh yeah, they're using fear of the Global Warming Boogeyman to impose more Government oppression on the People. The People are screaming for less Government, not more. But fear is a very powerful tool. People tend to go along with almost anything if you scare em enough.

They've pretty much lost the fight for that. Their credibility is shot because of their hypocrisy and their dishonesty.

Absolutely. The People are choosing freedom & liberty instead. And that's obviously very upsetting to the Communist Globalists who are behind the Global Warming fear mongering. If you don't go along, they'll try and force you to by way of Government intimidation and force. That's just what Communists do.

I'm choosing to take my chances with the Global Warming Boogeyman, rather than with the Communist assholes. Just where i stand anyway.

 

[paulitician]

ISIS ISIS... they're coming to America and take over the world ! Stop ISIS decried the RW's, STOP ISIS !!!

RW boogeymen ..

Left Wingers have been decrying it too. They've been Warmongering for War with Syria for a long time. And now they have their War. it's a Left Winger in the White House doing all the bombing & killing right now.

Only an ignoramus would call The President a "Left Winger" or suggest the Left Wing has been calling for war with Syria.

Uh, your Dear Leader is a known Marxist-Wannabe. So of course he's a Left Winger. And the Left/Progressives have been pushing for Intervention/War in Syria for awhile. Check out this great John Stossel piece on Progressives/Neocons and War...

It's no wonder you're brain washed; do you really believe ths 'interview' wasn't a rehershed spin on reality?

Do you have evidence that President Obama is a "Marxist-Wannabe"? He's only known as one, if he is, in far right circles of ignoranct extremists.

As for this 'interview' it is in sum and in total a fallacy, the Appeal to Authority, and the authority in this instance seems to have an agenda - both political and personal. Anyone who attend a University knows that Profs rarely, if ever, express the certainty of their convictions as did this clown. My guess is he's pushing a book which he has tried to get published and failed. Better he offer it to the Ministry of Truth or its representative who posts here, PoliticalChic.

Left/Progressives like you and the President have always been for Intervention/War. It looks like you're just learning that though. You Progressives and Neocons actually have quite a bit in common when it comes to the issue of Intervention/War. The most well-known Obamabots have been pushing for Intervention/War with Syria for a long time. That is the truth.

 

[TooTall]

Operations have begun into Syria.

Thanks for the update Econ.

under what legal authority does the prezbo have

to conduct an offensive war in Syria

The Obama administration pointed to the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which gives the president authority to act “against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons.” The administration has also cited the 2003 AUMF that authorized the president to go to war to “defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq,” then governed by Saddam Hussein.

The White House’s defenders argue that the 2001 AUMF gives Obama the authority he needs to fight ISIS because, while ISIS broke from al-Qaida in 2012, it is nonetheless composed of former al-Qaida members (at least in part), who have (or so it is argued by the administration) continuously conducted and sought to conduct attacks against the United States and its citizens and interests.

In other words, the EXACT same legal authority that Bush used to invade Iraq.

 

[TooTall]

According to admiral kissass they targeted 14 and hit 14. He wasn't specific on what type of targets. Could have been unoccupied tents for all we know.

Watching photos, before and after, on MSNBC right now.

Impressive.

Since the object of the bombing (or should have been) was to kill the leaders of ISIS, how many of them were in those buildings in the middle of the night?

 

[mudwhistle]

According to admiral kissass they targeted 14 and hit 14. He wasn't specific on what type of targets. Could have been unoccupied tents for all we know.

Watching photos, before and after, on MSNBC right now.

Impressive.

Since the object of the bombing (or should have been) was to kill the leaders of ISIS, how many of them were in those buildings in the middle of the night?

That's the point.

Obama likes pissing them off.

Next time take out their air conditioners. They'll die from heat stroke or something.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I sincerely hope that President Putin steps in and doesn't let obama get away with this unlawful invasion.

**** YOU! You're not only an asshole, you're a seditious POS.

Really, so is this what you said about Bush when he started the war in Iraq? I have a sneaking suspicion that you wanted someone to stop Bush from starting his war too. It's funny how you Democrats still hang on Obama's...ahem...coattails praising every move he makes, including going to war--AFTER railing on his predecessor. Your hypocrisy knows absolutely no bounds whatsoever.

 

[1776]

We got a laugh at work with the bombing in Syria and Iraq after Obama tried to claim "Islamic terrorism was dead after UBL."

Oh the irony from the stupid **** Obama.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Operations have begun into Syria.

Thanks for the update Econ.

under what legal authority does the prezbo have

to conduct an offensive war in Syria

The Obama administration pointed to the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which gives the president authority to act “against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons.” The administration has also cited the 2003 AUMF that authorized the president to go to war to “defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq,” then governed by Saddam Hussein.

The White House’s defenders argue that the 2001 AUMF gives Obama the authority he needs to fight ISIS because, while ISIS broke from al-Qaida in 2012, it is nonetheless composed of former al-Qaida members (at least in part), who have (or so it is argued by the administration) continuously conducted and sought to conduct attacks against the United States and its citizens and interests.

In other words, the EXACT same legal authority that Bush used to invade Iraq.

that would be incorrect

the correct authorization to invade Iraq was PL 107-243

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-107publ243/pdf/PLAW-107publ243.pdf

 

[jon_berzerk]

We got a laugh at work with the bombing in Syria and Iraq after Obama tried to claim "Islamic terrorism was dead after UBL."

Oh the irony from the stupid **** Obama.

a couple of months ago the prezbo wanted to repeal the law

--LOL

 

[Wry Catcher]

I sincerely hope that President Putin steps in and doesn't let obama get away with this unlawful invasion.

**** YOU! You're not only an asshole, you're a seditious POS.

Really, so is this what you said about Bush when he started the war in Iraq? I have a sneaking suspicion that you wanted someone to stop Bush from starting his war too. It's funny how you Democrats still hang on Obama's...ahem...coattails praising every move he makes, including going to war--AFTER railing on his predecessor. Your hypocrisy knows absolutely no bounds whatsoever.

Oh BULLSHIT. Clinton had Saddam corraled and used force whenever Saddam attempted to push the limits of the no fly zone.

Our nation had never before invaded a sovergn nation without cause - Saddam was no threat to us; yet the neocons had wanted to invade Iraq and didn't hide their desire to do so: See:

Project for the New American Century - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

And read the Statement of Principles written during the Clinton Administration. All this Mushroom Cloud threat was more bullshit, the leading neocons, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Libby wanted war and any excuse would do.

Obama had no hidden agenda, his agenda was clear from the get go. End foriegn wars, repair our nations image abroad and fix the economy badly broken by greed and a failure to regulate the so called Masters of the Universe.

I don't foresee American boots on the ground, and would not support an air and naval bombardment unless other Arab States had skin in the game. That they do is amazing and President Obama deserves credit for this accomplishment.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I sincerely hope that President Putin steps in and doesn't let obama get away with this unlawful invasion.

**** YOU! You're not only an asshole, you're a seditious POS.

Really, so is this what you said about Bush when he started the war in Iraq? I have a sneaking suspicion that you wanted someone to stop Bush from starting his war too. It's funny how you Democrats still hang on Obama's...ahem...coattails praising every move he makes, including going to war--AFTER railing on his predecessor. Your hypocrisy knows absolutely no bounds whatsoever.

Oh BULLSHIT. Clinton had Saddam corraled and used force whenever Saddam attempted to push the limits of the no fly zone.

Our nation had never before invaded a sovergn nation without cause - Saddam was no threat to us; yet the neocons had wanted to invade Iraq and didn't hide their desire to do so: See:

Project for the New American Century - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

And read the Statement of Principles written during the Clinton Administration. All this Mushroom Cloud threat was more bullshit, the leading neocons, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Libby wanted war and any excuse would do.

Obama had no hidden agenda, his agenda was clear from the get go. End foriegn wars, repair our nations image abroad and fix the economy badly broken by greed and a failure to regulate the so called Masters of the Universe.

I don't foresee American boots on the ground, and would not support an air and naval bombardment unless other Arab States had skin in the game. That they do is amazing and President Obama deserves credit for this accomplishment.

Saddam was no threat to us? I'm sorry, your argument is now invalid.

 

[Wry Catcher]

I sincerely hope that President Putin steps in and doesn't let obama get away with this unlawful invasion.

**** YOU! You're not only an asshole, you're a seditious POS.

Really, so is this what you said about Bush when he started the war in Iraq? I have a sneaking suspicion that you wanted someone to stop Bush from starting his war too. It's funny how you Democrats still hang on Obama's...ahem...coattails praising every move he makes, including going to war--AFTER railing on his predecessor. Your hypocrisy knows absolutely no bounds whatsoever.

Oh BULLSHIT. Clinton had Saddam corraled and used force whenever Saddam attempted to push the limits of the no fly zone.

Our nation had never before invaded a sovergn nation without cause - Saddam was no threat to us; yet the neocons had wanted to invade Iraq and didn't hide their desire to do so: See:

Project for the New American Century - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

And read the Statement of Principles written during the Clinton Administration. All this Mushroom Cloud threat was more bullshit, the leading neocons, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Libby wanted war and any excuse would do.

Obama had no hidden agenda, his agenda was clear from the get go. End foriegn wars, repair our nations image abroad and fix the economy badly broken by greed and a failure to regulate the so called Masters of the Universe.

I don't foresee American boots on the ground, and would not support an air and naval bombardment unless other Arab States had skin in the game. That they do is amazing and President Obama deserves credit for this accomplishment.

First you say Clinton had Saddam 'corralled,' yet in the same breath you say he was no threat to us? Your argument is now invalid.

A bit of history may help:

1991 uprisings in Iraq - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[TemplarKormac]

I sincerely hope that President Putin steps in and doesn't let obama get away with this unlawful invasion.

**** YOU! You're not only an asshole, you're a seditious POS.

Really, so is this what you said about Bush when he started the war in Iraq? I have a sneaking suspicion that you wanted someone to stop Bush from starting his war too. It's funny how you Democrats still hang on Obama's...ahem...coattails praising every move he makes, including going to war--AFTER railing on his predecessor. Your hypocrisy knows absolutely no bounds whatsoever.

Oh BULLSHIT. Clinton had Saddam corraled and used force whenever Saddam attempted to push the limits of the no fly zone.

Our nation had never before invaded a sovergn nation without cause - Saddam was no threat to us; yet the neocons had wanted to invade Iraq and didn't hide their desire to do so: See:

Project for the New American Century - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

And read the Statement of Principles written during the Clinton Administration. All this Mushroom Cloud threat was more bullshit, the leading neocons, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Libby wanted war and any excuse would do.

Obama had no hidden agenda, his agenda was clear from the get go. End foriegn wars, repair our nations image abroad and fix the economy badly broken by greed and a failure to regulate the so called Masters of the Universe.

I don't foresee American boots on the ground, and would not support an air and naval bombardment unless other Arab States had skin in the game. That they do is amazing and President Obama deserves credit for this accomplishment.

First you say Clinton had Saddam 'corralled,' yet in the same breath you say he was no threat to us? Your argument is now invalid.

A bit of history may help:

1991 uprisings in Iraq - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Uhhh, Wry, when a guy has tons of chemical weapons, do you sincerely think he would limit it to slaughtering his own people? Israel was within arms reach, he tried to invade Kuwait and failed. He was a deranged madman who would gas anyone given the opportunity. Perhaps is it you who needs 'a bit of history.' From then on Saddam evaded capture for 12 years, so he was not 'corralled' at all. You have no understanding of the tactics of warfare, other than pacifism.