toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
There is no way you are going to see what you do not wish to see.
In other words, you DO see what you wish to see?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There is no way you are going to see what you do not wish to see.
In other words, you DO see what you wish to see?
His entire life revolves around trying to debate people in this forum.
Offhand, I'd say we are RIGHT HERE:Milankovitch Cycles and where we are at today
Show the data, bro. You can't because no one has ever attempted to quantify the associated temperature for varying CO2 concentrations. It's almost criminal what they are doing.Svante Arrhenius, 1896.
When you are 100% wrong, I will definitely state that you are 100% wrong. And that is what you are concerning the presently changing climate.Is THAT what he calls it?! I always thought debate involved 2-way discussion where you are at least open to the possibility of more than your own POV!
Rather than just always telling everyone else how wrong they are!
But then, being Leftist MEANS that everything in your bubble is already considered settled science!
Look Dingleberry, we fully understand that 3rd grade science is beyond your ken.The OP is all fur coat and no trousers.
He can't produce a laboratory controlled experiment which quantifies the associated temperature for varying CO2 concentrations.
He has no understanding of the complexity of the earth's climate.
Now you little fucked up liar I have done that for various geological periods multiple times. But you are going to spew your denier nonsense, no matter what the evidence and observations show.Show the data, bro. You can't because no one has ever attempted to quantify the associated temperature for varying CO2 concentrations. It's almost criminal what they are doing.
Why do you think they have never tried to perform a laboratory controlled experiment to quantify the associated temperature of CO2 at varying concentrations?Look Dingleberry, we fully understand that 3rd grade science is beyond your ken.
Show me the laboratory data, bro? You can't because there is none. No science has been performed to quantify the associated temperature of CO2 at varying concentrations. None. Nada. Zip.Now you little fucked up liar I have done that for various geological periods multiple times. But you are going to spew your denier nonsense, no matter what the evidence and observations show.
When you are 100% wrong, I will definitely state that you are 100% wrong.
There is no way you are going to see what you do not wish to see.