jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 160,230
- 39,993
- 2,180
why is it so important to you?
Midterm history sets bar high for a “wave”
- Thread starter citygator
- Start date
M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
2018: GOP-41/+2
According to your definituin, that was not a wave.
2006: GOP -31/-5
According to your definition, that was barely a "wave"
In both cases, you'll argue the GOP "lost" the election.
- Banned
- #43
So this is how you pathetic stupid Moon Bats are trying to rationalize the ass kicking you are going to get tomorrow? LOL!Just for perspective for you hammerheads so you don’t move the goalposts.
“In the 22 midterm elections from 1934 -2018, the President's party has averaged a loss of 28 House seats and four Senate seats. The president’s party has gained seats in both houses only twice.”
That’s how high the bar is just to be an average election. In order to be a wave we’ll need to see something bigger than average.
The Senate is too close to call. The House was always gonna bounce back after 19 new gerrymandered seats were spun this election cycle in the spring.
The democrats have higher expectations after the Pubs nominated 2 historically bad candidates putting the Senate in play. We’ll see how they end up but know where the goalposts are located.
The 2022 Midterm Elections: What the Historical Data Suggest. | The American Presidency Project
www.presidency.ucsb.edu
Don't worry Moon Bat. The House is lost for you because it is to spread out for you to steal. However, you little traitorous turds will steal the Senate. You already have the ballots printed and boxed up and ready to be revealed at the appropriate time in states like Penn and Georgia. Just like you did in 2020.
- Thread starter
- #44
Yea. It's about printed ballots and cheating. Youre retarded and add no value here.
ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 67,756
- 77,181
- 3,615
Just for perspective for you hammerheads so you don’t move the goalposts.
“In the 22 midterm elections from 1934 -2018, the President's party has averaged a loss of 28 House seats and four Senate seats. The president’s party has gained seats in both houses only twice.”
That’s how high the bar is just to be an average election. In order to be a wave we’ll need to see something bigger than average.
The Senate is too close to call. The House was always gonna bounce back after 19 new gerrymandered seats were spun this election cycle in the spring.
The democrats have higher expectations after the Pubs nominated 2 historically bad candidates putting the Senate in play. We’ll see how they end up but know where the goalposts are located.
The 2022 Midterm Elections: What the Historical Data Suggest. | The American Presidency Project
You said there would be a blue wave.
M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
He did.
And he's trying to move the goalposts - "Blue wave" now means "Biden didn't lose aa bad as Obama or Clinton".
ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 67,756
- 77,181
- 3,615
Just for perspective for you hammerheads so you don’t move the goalposts.
“In the 22 midterm elections from 1934 -2018, the President's party has averaged a loss of 28 House seats and four Senate seats. The president’s party has gained seats in both houses only twice.”
That’s how high the bar is just to be an average election. In order to be a wave we’ll need to see something bigger than average.
The Senate is too close to call. The House was always gonna bounce back after 19 new gerrymandered seats were spun this election cycle in the spring.
The democrats have higher expectations after the Pubs nominated 2 historically bad candidates putting the Senate in play. We’ll see how they end up but know where the goalposts are located.
The 2022 Midterm Elections: What the Historical Data Suggest. | The American Presidency Project
- Banned
- #48
The traitorous Democrats have a history of stealing elections and you stupid Moon Bats always deny that they do it.
C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Conservatives will still lie about a ‘wave’ regardless the facts.Just for perspective for you hammerheads so you don’t move the goalposts.
“In the 22 midterm elections from 1934 -2018, the President's party has averaged a loss of 28 House seats and four Senate seats. The president’s party has gained seats in both houses only twice.”
That’s how high the bar is just to be an average election. In order to be a wave we’ll need to see something bigger than average.
The Senate is too close to call. The House was always gonna bounce back after 19 new gerrymandered seats were spun this election cycle in the spring.
The democrats have higher expectations after the Pubs nominated 2 historically bad candidates putting the Senate in play. We’ll see how they end up but know where the goalposts are located.
The 2022 Midterm Elections: What the Historical Data Suggest. | The American Presidency Project
- Thread starter
- #50
Blue wave has fizzled... seemingly. Looks like a normal election with no red/blue waves. Looks like inflation is hurting democrats and being racist anti-freedom anti-democracy women hating totalitarians is hurting republicans.
- Thread starter
- #51
No they dont. Moron have a history of making shit up that other morons believe. Congrats. You win the prize for being a fantasy moron.
- Thread starter
- #52
What's a blue wave?
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
And on Wednesday nothing will change.
and on Jan 1st 2023 nothing will change
This time next year nothing will have changed
M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 160,230
- 39,993
- 2,180
Well again, we know of 250,000 in PA sent out unverified.
- Banned
- #56
This is the type of shit we see from the Democrat scum.
At least this one was caught in time. Just think how many more from the Democrat districts won't be caught.
- Thread starter
- #57
You live in anecdotes. The vast majority of election fraud is frivolous and caused by republicans. The conservative Heritage Foundation has a database on voter fraud...
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The database includes 749 “cases” involving almost 1,100 individuals. Only 105 cases come within the past five years, and 488 within the past 10 years.
In reviewing decades of cases and billions of votes cast, the Heritage Foundation has identified just 10 cases involving in-person impersonation fraud at the polls. Heritage thus confirms what extensive prior research has shown — it is more likely that an individual will be struck by lightning than impersonate another voter at the polls.
• The database includes only 41 cases involving non-citizens registering, voting, or attempting to vote. This is particularly striking given the claims made by President Trump in setting up the Commission that millions of illegal votes were cast in 2016; on other occasions, he said 3 to 5 million unauthorized immigrants robbed him of the popular vote majority. The fact that only 41 such cases were identified over a time span of more than four decades highlights the absurdity of claims that millions of non-citizens voted in the 2016 election alone.
LordBrownTrout
Diamond Member
Dems lost 63 seats in the house in 2010. The second worst hammering in history.
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 160,230
- 39,993
- 2,180
Yep, as I already stated yesterday, if there's one there's another, and most probably many more around the country. This guy did not act on his own accordance.
New Topics
-
Check out AOC's maidservant holding an umbrella over her while the "socialist" mugs for the camera- Started by marvin martian
- Replies: 6
-
Michigan Dem Senate candidate Mallory McMorrow purges X account following The Post’s report on her social media history- Started by Dont Taz Me Bro
- Replies: 0
-
Core inflation rate hit 3.2% in March as first-quarter growth disappointed at 2%- Started by Zincwarrior
- Replies: 0
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
Is this really the rallying cry the Repubs want to coalesce around?- Latest: OhPleaseJustQuit
-
-
-
