MIDS harass Treasury Sec and chase him out of DC restaurant

[Marener]

MIDs are not able to separate that out. Any crime, no matter how major or minor, is permitted if the victim is of a different political persuasion.

It’s not a crime to yell at someone.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

MIDs are not able to separate that out. Any crime, no matter how major or minor, is permitted if the victim is of a different political persuasion.

He actually thinks that, for those criticizing the woman, this is about politics. It's about politics for her and that is precisely the problem with all this. No one is interested in having their dinners interrupted by butt-hurt, self-righteous arrogant shrews squealing about a personal problem with another patron. Take it somewhere else.

 

[struth]

It’s not a crime to yell at someone.

Depends, disorderly conduct is a crime in my state Title 18.2. Crimes and Offenses Generally


Most jurisdictions have similar laws

These dems should be charged

 

[Lisa558]

It’s not a crime to yell at someone.

It is a violation of the law to disturb the peace.

 

[Lisa558]

Depends, disorderly conduct is a crime in my state Title 18.2. Crimes and Offenses Generally


Most jurisdictions have similar laws

These dems should be charged

Oh wow….i just said the same thing (but not as well). Great minds think alike.

 

[Rawley]

So quit whining and file charges you big baby.

It's DC, run by your cult. Nothing will happen to these assholes.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

It’s not a crime to yell at someone.

In this setting? Yes, I believe it is. This case probably falls under disturbing the peace or disorderly conduct. It is a misdemeanor but a law nonetheless.

 

[Marener]

In this setting? Yes, I believe it is. This case probably falls under disturbing the peace or disorderly conduct. It is a misdemeanor but a law nonetheless.

It’s not in public.

 

[Crepitus]

You didn’t address point 1.

Was the restaurant owner wrong in allowing the assault of the MID against Bessett to proceed until he was driven out of the restaurant?

It's private property. The owner of the restaurant can allow whatever legal behavior he/she wishes.

 

[struth]

It’s not in public.

Haha. Being in a restaurant isn’t being in public??? Hahaha

Do you even get tried or embarrassing yourself??

 

[struth]

It's private property. The owner of the restaurant can allow whatever legal behavior he/she wishes.

Disorderly conduct is illegal behavior in Washington DC

§ 22–1321. Disorderly conduct. | D.C. Law Library

code.dccouncil.gov

 

[Lockback]

It’s not a crime to yell at someone.

The fact that you would excuse this kind of behavior really demonstrates just how loathsome the Left is.
I sincerely hope you get hassled at dinner sometimes by outraged nut jobs and see how you like it.

 

[Lisa558]

It’s not in public.

A restaurant is indeed in public.

 

[Lisa558]

The fact that you would excuse this kind of behavior really demonstrates just how loathsome the Left is.
I sincerely hope you get hassled at dinner sometimes by outraged nut jobs and see how you like it.

It really is alarming how much the Left has devolved. They will accept ANY degree of awful behavior as long as it is directed at a person or member of a group they disapprove of, yet at the same time threaten to bring down a company because their syrup logo might offend blacks and defend calls of “Death to Jews” as free speech.

Their double standards are atrocious, and they’re so indoctrinated they don’t even see it.

 

[Lisa558]

It's private property. The owner of the restaurant can allow whatever legal behavior he/she wishes.

You MIDs sure like to defend vile behavior.

And you are WRONG. It is illegal to harass people in restaurants. Both the MIDs and the owner should be charged.

Both this is libtard DC. And populated by people like you. Meaning: they’ll get away with it.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

It’s not in public.

If those laws don't apply, do you condone this sort of thing?

 

[Crepitus]

Disorderly conduct is illegal behavior in Washington DC

§ 22–1321. Disorderly conduct. | D.C. Law Library

code.dccouncil.gov

Private property. You and your guests can be as disorderly as you want in your own place as long as you aren't disturbing the neighbors.

 

[struth]

Private property. You and your guests can be as disorderly as you want in your own place as long as you aren't disturbing the neighbors.

It’s not relevant, it’s in public

It’s a restaurant

Not sure why you think you can commit crimes on private property

 

[Crepitus]

You MIDs sure like to defend vile behavior.

And you are WRONG. It is illegal to harass people in restaurants. Both the MIDs and the owner should be charged.

Both this is libtard DC. And populated by people like you. Meaning: they’ll get away with it.

private property.

I don't even know what a MID ism BTW.

 

[Crepitus]

It’s not relevant, it’s in public

It’s a restaurant

Not sure why you think you can commit crimes on private property

No, it's private property. Meaning it's not community property like a street corner.

Come on, kid. these words have legal meanings when you talk about this kinda thing.