Middle Class to Get 23% of Tax Cuts (guess who gets the other 77%?)

Well it is 8.5 trillion less than Obama burdened our children with. I see yo don't care about that.

You are peddling bullshit, Obama spent 870 Billion on Stimulus in the middle of Great Recession, that was the extend of his debt contribution (other than extension of Bush's tax cuts)

2009 budget had 1.3 Trillion dollar deficit well before Obama got into office - you are going to tell me HE spent it? :rolleyes:

You are peddling bullshit, Obama spent 870 Billion on Stimulus in the middle of Great Recession, that was the extend of his debt contribution

His second year of spending was $870 billion less than his first year?

Wtf are you talking about? Stimulus spending was over 3 years

How much did total spending drop after the stimulus ended?

Can you seriously not even do a basic google search?

Deficits went down from 1.4T in 2009 down to 400B in 2015. Obama's 870 billion stimulus (and arguably tax-cut extensions) was his contribution to those deficits.

Any questions or do you get it now?

Deficits went down from 1.4T in 2009 down to 400B in 2015.

Yeah, he did a super-duper job.
But how much did his spending go down after the stimulus ended?

Obama's 870 billion stimulus

Maybe your point would be clearer if you broke out the stimulus by year?
 
You are peddling bullshit, Obama spent 870 Billion on Stimulus in the middle of Great Recession, that was the extend of his debt contribution (other than extension of Bush's tax cuts)

2009 budget had 1.3 Trillion dollar deficit well before Obama got into office - you are going to tell me HE spent it? :rolleyes:

You are peddling bullshit, Obama spent 870 Billion on Stimulus in the middle of Great Recession, that was the extend of his debt contribution

His second year of spending was $870 billion less than his first year?

Wtf are you talking about? Stimulus spending was over 3 years

How much did total spending drop after the stimulus ended?

Can you seriously not even do a basic google search?

Deficits went down from 1.4T in 2009 down to 400B in 2015. Obama's 870 billion stimulus (and arguably tax-cut extensions) was his contribution to those deficits.

Any questions or do you get it now?

Deficits went down from 1.4T in 2009 down to 400B in 2015.

Yeah, he did a super-duper job.
But how much did his spending go down after the stimulus ended?

Obama's 870 billion stimulus

Maybe your point would be clearer if you broke out the stimulus by year?

Do try to get through your thick scull deficits, like economy, for the most part are not hinged on a president.

There is baseline spending and economic factors and tax policy on revenues side that a president inherits when he gets into office.

Beyond tax policies, president can indirectly effect revenues by improving (or worsening) economic growth, but it's a fractional effect to underlying baselines.

So when it comes to gauging President's effects on deficits you have to look not at total deficits but at DEFICIT PRESIDENT'S POLICIES CAUSED.

AGAIN, if you can name Obama's contribution to long run deficits beyond Stimulus and extension of tax cuts then go ahead and name them, because otherwise you are just posting beat-around-the-bush bullshit.



P.S. stop asking other people to do simple google searches for you - it's pathetic. Just in case you don't know how to do that, let me show you by clicking the link bellow:

Let Me Google It For You
 
Last edited:
P.S. stop asking other people to do simple google searches for you - it's pathetic. Just in case you don't know how to do that, let me show you by clicking the link bellow:

Let Me Google It For You

Todd, the moron, likes to hand out "assignments" to others, as a way to avoid addressing the topic.....Todd is mostly a waste of cyberspace.....lol
 
It is reported that the middle class will see a boost in their income, as soon as February. Thanks president Trump!

Yes, thank you for the crumbs you sliced off from 1.5 TRILLION debt financed windfall for the rich and corporations mr.President, thank you so much. Our kids won't mind one bit paying all this off with interest.
Well it is 8.5 trillion less than Obama burdened our children with. I see yo don't care about that.

You are peddling bullshit, Obama spent 870 Billion on Stimulus in the middle of Great Recession, that was the extend of his debt contribution (other than extension of Bush's tax cuts)

2009 budget had 1.3 Trillion dollar deficit well before Obama got into office - you are going to tell me HE spent it? :rolleyes:

And the interest on $870 billion we are still paying?
 
If right wingers could place the political biases aside, they'd be pissed also......


Middle Class to Get 23% of Tax Cuts for Individuals Under GOP Bill

Benefits mostly peter out after a decade, joint committee on taxation finds

Taxpayers earning $500,000 or more a year would see the biggest cuts in average tax rates under the Republican tax plan, while lower-income households would see smaller cuts in the early years of the decade and then petering out or reversing as tax cuts expire.


The Middle-Class Tax Cut That’s Really a Hike

Under the House plan, a family making $59,000 would pay more in 2024 than they did last year.

A Quinnipiac University poll released last week found that 55% of those surveyed disapprove of the tax plan, compared with 26% who support it. Republicans were the only group who supported the tax plan, with the support of 66%.

Middle Class to Get 23% of Tax Cuts for Individuals Under GOP Bill

In political gamble, GOP gives permanent tax cuts to corporations, but ...

Under the House plan, a family making $59,000 would pay more in 2024 than they did last year.

That's horrible!
How much less will they pay in 2018, in 2019, in 2020, in 2021, in 2022 and in 2023?

Wasn't your side of the aisle (the callous conservative / greed and anti tax side) pissing and whining about leaving a growing debt to future generations?
 
You are peddling bullshit, Obama spent 870 Billion on Stimulus in the middle of Great Recession, that was the extend of his debt contribution

His second year of spending was $870 billion less than his first year?

Wtf are you talking about? Stimulus spending was over 3 years

How much did total spending drop after the stimulus ended?

Can you seriously not even do a basic google search?

Deficits went down from 1.4T in 2009 down to 400B in 2015. Obama's 870 billion stimulus (and arguably tax-cut extensions) was his contribution to those deficits.

Any questions or do you get it now?

Deficits went down from 1.4T in 2009 down to 400B in 2015.

Yeah, he did a super-duper job.
But how much did his spending go down after the stimulus ended?

Obama's 870 billion stimulus

Maybe your point would be clearer if you broke out the stimulus by year?

Do try to get through your thick scull deficits, like economy, for the most part are not hinged on a president.

There is baseline spending and economic factors and tax policy on revenues side that a president inherits when he gets into office.

Beyond tax policies, president can indirectly effect revenues by improving (or worsening) economic growth, but it's a fractional effect to underlying baselines.

So when it comes to gauging President's effects on deficits you have to look not at total deficits but at DEFICIT PRESIDENT'S POLICIES CAUSED.

AGAIN, if you can name Obama's contribution to long run deficits beyond Stimulus and extension of tax cuts then go ahead and name them, because otherwise you are just posting beat-around-the-bush bullshit.



P.S. stop asking other people to do simple google searches for you - it's pathetic. Just in case you don't know how to do that, let me show you by clicking the link bellow:

Let Me Google It For You

Poor Obama, can't be given any responsibility for the $9.3 trillion in debt added during his tenure.

He dindu nuffin'.
 
If right wingers could place the political biases aside, they'd be pissed also......


Middle Class to Get 23% of Tax Cuts for Individuals Under GOP Bill

Benefits mostly peter out after a decade, joint committee on taxation finds

Taxpayers earning $500,000 or more a year would see the biggest cuts in average tax rates under the Republican tax plan, while lower-income households would see smaller cuts in the early years of the decade and then petering out or reversing as tax cuts expire.


The Middle-Class Tax Cut That’s Really a Hike

Under the House plan, a family making $59,000 would pay more in 2024 than they did last year.

A Quinnipiac University poll released last week found that 55% of those surveyed disapprove of the tax plan, compared with 26% who support it. Republicans were the only group who supported the tax plan, with the support of 66%.

Middle Class to Get 23% of Tax Cuts for Individuals Under GOP Bill

In political gamble, GOP gives permanent tax cuts to corporations, but ...

Under the House plan, a family making $59,000 would pay more in 2024 than they did last year.

That's horrible!
How much less will they pay in 2018, in 2019, in 2020, in 2021, in 2022 and in 2023?

Wasn't your side of the aisle (the callous conservative / greed and anti tax side) pissing and whining about leaving a growing debt to future generations?

You betcha. Let's cut spending 30%....to start.
 
Poor Obama, can't be given any responsibility for the $9.3 trillion in debt added during his tenure.

He dindu nuffin'.


Well, that huge debt DID help us out of a terrible recession and helped Trump inherit a very, very good economy, yes or no, Todd-baby? ........LOL

(don't bother answering since you're too far up Trump fat ass......)
 
Poor Obama, can't be given any responsibility for the $9.3 trillion in debt added during his tenure.

He dindu nuffin'.


Well, that huge debt DID help us out of a terrible recession and helped Trump inherit a very, very good economy, yes or no, Todd-baby? ........LOL

(don't bother answering since you're too far up Trump fat ass......)

Well, that huge debt DID help us out of a terrible recession

$9.3 trillion in added debt and all we got was the weakest post-war recovery? Fail.
 
and all we got was the weakest post-war recovery? Fail.


Well, the above is because you're a ******* idiot posing an equally fucked up opinion....but you knew that already, I'm sure......LOL
 


do morons like you ONLY read the ******* title of an article???

Find some grown up to read the rest.....Here, I'll point out the key point

Plenty of experts say "hold on." This recovery may be slow, but it's also lasted a long time -- far longer than usual -- and job growth has been good.

"We are in the fourth longest expansion in U.S. history," notes Achuthan.

Since World War II, the American economy has typically grown for about five years and then had a contraction. This expansion is already over seven years old.

Furthermore, the average pace of job growth in this recovery has already topped what happened during the 2001 to 2007 expansion under President George W. Bush (the Bush recovery was the slowest in terms of jobs growth, Achuthan says).

Over 14 million jobs have been added since the low point from the financial crisis. Job growth is as important -- if not more important -- than overall growth, many economists argue.

"We are experiencing the longest string of consecutive monthly jobs gains in economic history," says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics.
 


do morons like you ONLY read the ******* title of an article???

Find some grown up to read the rest.....Here, I'll point out the key point

Plenty of experts say "hold on." This recovery may be slow, but it's also lasted a long time -- far longer than usual -- and job growth has been good.

"We are in the fourth longest expansion in U.S. history," notes Achuthan.

Since World War II, the American economy has typically grown for about five years and then had a contraction. This expansion is already over seven years old.

Furthermore, the average pace of job growth in this recovery has already topped what happened during the 2001 to 2007 expansion under President George W. Bush (the Bush recovery was the slowest in terms of jobs growth, Achuthan says).

Over 14 million jobs have been added since the low point from the financial crisis. Job growth is as important -- if not more important -- than overall growth, many economists argue.

"We are experiencing the longest string of consecutive monthly jobs gains in economic history," says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics.

you ONLY read the ******* title of an article???

The ******* title that proved my ******* claim? DERP!

This recovery may be slow, but it's also lasted a long time -

Yup. Long slow recovery, and it only cost $9.3 trillion in added debt.
 
Back
Top Bottom