No, voter fraud will having nothing to do with the decision.
Are you familiar with the 1960 Presidential election results in Illinois and Texas?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, voter fraud will having nothing to do with the decision.
You have that backwards, replace "Trump" with "Clinton" and you'll have it right.It might not be as close as it seems. Pollsters are underestimating the "I-can't-tell-my-friends-and-family-but-I-can't-vote-for-Trump" vote.The whole election is a tossup at this point. It'll come down to voter turnout and unfortunately, voter fraud.
People don't seem to have a problem saying what they want about Hillary. Trump supporters, however, seem to gravitate to other "solutions" when faced with a likely loss.You have that backwards, replace "Trump" with "Clinton" and you'll have it right.It might not be as close as it seems. Pollsters are underestimating the "I-can't-tell-my-friends-and-family-but-I-can't-vote-for-Trump" vote.The whole election is a tossup at this point. It'll come down to voter turnout and unfortunately, voter fraud.
All of the polling little one, and then divide the live phone call from auto calls and internet polls.Detroit Free Press 11/1 - 11/3 600 LV 4.0 42 38 5 -- Clinton +4Michigan is no more tied than the OP is black.
FOX 2 Detroit/Mitchell 11/2 - 11/2 1150 LV 2.9 47 44 4 1 Clinton +3
Emerson 10/25 - 10/26 500 LV 4.3 50 43 3 3 Clinton +7
Emerson is too old to consider; DFP MofE is 4, so she is within the MOE and it doesn't count for a bonafide stat. FOX2 has a MofE of 2.9 so she has a stat of .1. That could be considered a tie.
Fraud is just an excuse to make losing more palatable. The likelihood of it having any effect on the outcome is tiny and cancelled out by bad actors on both sides.Voter fraud is "RARE", so like the Dems say...we should just ignore it. You know....just like transgendered humans are "RARE"...we should just ignore it.
He should....DEMOCRATS have really fucked that State up.
He should....DEMOCRATS have really fucked that State up.
No, we have a Rep congress now and a Rep Gov.
Fraud is just an excuse to make losing more palatable. The likelihood of it having any effect on the outcome is tiny and cancelled out by bad actors on both sides.Voter fraud is "RARE", so like the Dems say...we should just ignore it. You know....just like transgendered humans are "RARE"...we should just ignore it.
The election isn't being held right now so your point is both moot and stupid.They are in play only because the election is 4 days away. No argument that if the election were held right now, she'd win, and by a larger margin that Obama beat Romney.all of the polling taken together says you are puffing on a bongMI and PA are definitely in play. Any Democrat counting those as in the bag are kidding themselves.
Granny, I think you missed the point, which is neither unusual nor surprising. LOLThe election isn't being held right now so your point is both moot and stupid.They are in play only because the election is 4 days away. No argument that if the election were held right now, she'd win, and by a larger margin that Obama beat Romney.all of the polling taken together says you are puffing on a bongMI and PA are definitely in play. Any Democrat counting those as in the bag are kidding themselves.
He should....DEMOCRATS have really fucked that State up.
MI and PA are definitely in play. Any Democrat counting those as in the bag are kidding themselves.
FYI: I don't accept info without citations and there are plenty of Republican precincts where vote tallies come up with percentages in the "People's Republic" range.FYI: 90% of discovered vote fraud instances favor Democrat candidates. Without reliable voter ID requirements, there is no way to tell how big the problem is. The only other way to measure it is statistically improbable vote tallies for certain candidates in certain precincts, almost always controlled by one of the political parties. Can you guess which one?Fraud is just an excuse to make losing more palatable. The likelihood of it having any effect on the outcome is tiny and cancelled out by bad actors on both sides.
Are you aware it is not 1960 and that voter security is much tighter?No, voter fraud will having nothing to do with the decision.
Are you familiar with the 1960 Presidential election results in Illinois and Texas?
We have reliable and viable voter security, and you cannot show differently.Fraud is just an excuse to make losing more palatable. The likelihood of it having any effect on the outcome is tiny and cancelled out by bad actors on both sides.Voter fraud is "RARE", so like the Dems say...we should just ignore it. You know....just like transgendered humans are "RARE"...we should just ignore it.
FYI: 90% of discovered vote fraud instances favor Democrat candidates. Without reliable voter ID requirements, there is no way to tell how big the problem is. The only other way to measure it is statistically improbable vote tallies for certain candidates in certain precincts, almost always controlled by one of the political parties. Can you guess which one?
He should....DEMOCRATS have really fucked that State up.
No, we have a Rep congress now and a Rep Gov.
Hes fixing the mess from Granholm. And Im pretty sure he meant the cities, ie Detroit
He will because Democratic Party has sold out blue collar industrial workers.He should....DEMOCRATS have really fucked that State up.
Michigan is tied...Can Trump actually win Michigan?