They get on them because they are ooorFood stamps don’t make people poor
Obama grew the amount of people on food stamps
He grew poverty
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They get on them because they are ooorFood stamps don’t make people poor
Why would I do that? Are you here to argue semantics?Backing off on your “exploding” claim already?
but you forgot to put it in your post?You think because I'm a Democrat, I don't know what happened in communist countries in their history?
well then you'll be happy to know it was what you actually did and didn't do/say in your post that is in question here...not the faux equivalent you are trying to run by me here.That's not a very bright way to talk, claiming to know what I'm thinking better than I do.
I'm sure you know, thats why I saidYou think because I'm a Democrat, I don't know what happened in communist countries in their history?
in fact I am sure it isn't honest
Hitler comes after Trump and others if it comes at all. The timing I do not know. You will get your Communist despots. And they exist now. They are empowered. We see the violence. Still, they are not at the mass extermination stage. Mensheviks and Bolsheviks are the order of the day. You guys waste so much in resources. Designed to destroy a nation and put a new style of government into it.Sounds awful lot like Trump
I’m here to argue FACTSWhy would I do that? Are you here to argue semantics?
Fine...it's a FACT that wealth inequality increased during Barack Obama's 2 terms...especially for black Americans!I’m here to argue FACTS
It’s a fact that it HAD BEEN for quite some timeFine...it's a FACT that wealth inequality increased during Barack Obama's 2 terms...especially for black Americans!![]()
Back to arguing semantics again?It’s a fact that it HAD BEEN for quite some time
It’s a fact that it did NOT “explode”
It’s a fact that you lied
You mean back to pointing out you lied.Back to arguing semantics again?
The FACT is that Barry did more to help his rich Martha's Vineyard buddies than he did black people!![]()
What was the lie?You mean back to pointing out you lied.
Never a good way to begin a discussion
Wrong. You’re lying again. Go back and lookWhat was the lie?
Your "discussion" with me began with you calling me a liar. FABULOUS way to begin a discussion! (eye roll)
Tell me what the "lie" was? You made the claim. Back it up.Wrong. You’re lying again. Go back and look
See that's the difference between an old-school (up to and including the Obama era) Democrat and these new young Democrats.Interesting. Would you care to take a crack at explaining why the difference in wealth between the richest Americans and the Lower Classes exploded during Obama's time in office?
Okay, I didn't notice I had left that out.but you forgot to put it in your post?
I'm sure you do know what happened, but for some reason decided to withhold that information as I pointed out but not what you did with naziism...btw, I'm a democat.
Uh . . . okay?well then you'll be happy to know it was what you actually did and didn't do/say in your post that is in question here...not the faux equivalent you are trying to run by me here.
I've got to be honest with you...I know the left likes to portray Obama as something "new" but the facts really don't back that up! He talked a good game but when you look at what he did...it wasn't any different from liberals before him. He made promises he knew he had no intention of keeping to get votes and lied about the costs of the programs he did get passed.See that's the difference between an old-school (up to Obama era) Democrat and these new young Democrats.
If the rich made out, it's because the economy was good, and ain't that what normal people want from a president? I'm glad the "lower class" is so well taken care of and all, but at some point enough is enough.
He wasn't that "new." His policies were very similar to Hillary Clinton's, but he was more presidential and had less negatives.I've got to be honest with you...I know the left likes to portray Obama as something "new" but the facts really don't back that up! He talked a good game but you look at what he did...it wasn't any different from liberals before him. He made promises he knew he had no intention of keeping to get votes and lied about the costs of the programs he did get passed.
Were his policies really aimed at making life better for Americans? The numbers never made sense with Obamacare but if you disputed them you were painted as someone who hated the poor. If you were serious about reforming healthcare wouldn't you be honest about how it would work and what it would cost?He wasn't that "new." His policies were very similar to Hillary Clinton's, but he was more presidential and had less negatives.
Yes, his policies were more expensive than predicted and there was more fraud and waste than expected. What government policies that have ever been implemented could not the same be said of?
Some of Obama's ideas didn't work out. Some did.
Obama's policies were always aimed at making life better for Americans. I cannot say the same for the Cringy duo of Biden and Harris. If the Democrat Party doesn't step back and return to its working class and pro-American roots, we may become as disreputable as right after the Civil War.
Edit: I see what confused you. I should have said "up to and including Obama-era." If there is time I'll change it.
Read the thread stupidTell me what the "lie" was? You made the claim. Back it up.