Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are so many inaccuracies in the above, I'd really like to know whence you get that stuff.
Of course, Flynn's interview (and others') were not done pursuant a "criminal investigation". It's been a counter-intelligence operation. They were not "spying on a campaign", they were investigating some folks allegedly colluding with a foreign power during the campaign, or conducting foreign policy during the transition behind the back of a sitting President.
They were not set up, they lied about what they were doing, and for good reasons.
The agents interviewing Flynn didn't say he was "telling the truth". They said he didn't lie. That means, they thought what he told was inaccurate, but not demonstrably with the intent to deceive. Huge, huge difference. If you read the 302, the inaccuracies are pretty obvious, the conclusion he lied may be a judgment call. Only when Mueller took over was that further scrutinized, and Mueller arrived at a different conclusion, which none other than Flynn by now has confirmed.
No I was talking to Skylar. Cant you read?
Uh, you do know this is a public forum?
You would know how to deal with failure since you fail all the time. Yes I knew this was a public forum. I could tell by all the people commenting and the fact I had navigate here by using a browser. Why do you ask?No I was talking to Skylar. Cant you read?
Well talking to a friend can help when one has so miserably failed such as you did I guess.
There are so many inaccuracies in the above, I'd really like to know whence you get that stuff.
Of course, Flynn's interview (and others') were not done pursuant a "criminal investigation". It's been a counter-intelligence operation. They were not "spying on a campaign", they were investigating some folks allegedly colluding with a foreign power during the campaign, or conducting foreign policy during the transition behind the back of a sitting President.
They were not set up, they lied about what they were doing, and for good reasons.
The agents interviewing Flynn didn't say he was "telling the truth". They said he didn't lie. That means, they thought what he told was inaccurate, but not demonstrably with the intent to deceive. Huge, huge difference. If you read the 302, the inaccuracies are pretty obvious, the conclusion he lied may be a judgment call. Only when Mueller took over was that further scrutinized, and Mueller arrived at a different conclusion, which none other than Flynn by now has confirmed.
OH....So....accusing a person of lying is now a 'judgement call?' You do know that there is not one scintilla of evidence pointing to any Russian collusion....? Aside from that 'collusion' in itself is not a crime. The 'criminal investigation' was and is a farce.
Not sure how that keeps Flynn from being a convict for self admittedly lying to the FBI?There are so many inaccuracies in the above, I'd really like to know whence you get that stuff.
Of course, Flynn's interview (and others') were not done pursuant a "criminal investigation". It's been a counter-intelligence operation. They were not "spying on a campaign", they were investigating some folks allegedly colluding with a foreign power during the campaign, or conducting foreign policy during the transition behind the back of a sitting President.
They were not set up, they lied about what they were doing, and for good reasons.
The agents interviewing Flynn didn't say he was "telling the truth". They said he didn't lie. That means, they thought what he told was inaccurate, but not demonstrably with the intent to deceive. Huge, huge difference. If you read the 302, the inaccuracies are pretty obvious, the conclusion he lied may be a judgment call. Only when Mueller took over was that further scrutinized, and Mueller arrived at a different conclusion, which none other than Flynn by now has confirmed.
OH....So....accusing a person of lying is now a 'judgement call?' You do know that there is not one scintilla of evidence pointing to any Russian collusion....? Aside from that 'collusion' in itself is not a crime. The 'criminal investigation' was and is a farce.
OH....So....accusing a person of lying is now a 'judgement call?' You do know that there is not one scintilla of evidence pointing to any Russian collusion....? Aside from that 'collusion' in itself is not a crime. The 'criminal investigation' was and is a farce.
He thinks citing Marc the blogger makes him look smart.OH....So....accusing a person of lying is now a 'judgement call?' You do know that there is not one scintilla of evidence pointing to any Russian collusion....? Aside from that 'collusion' in itself is not a crime. The 'criminal investigation' was and is a farce.
Do you think making many points where none are required makes you look smart?
Do you know Mueller has yet to produce his report, detailing the evidence, on the collusion?
Have you followed at all? I have stated, explicitly, that was (when Flynn was interviewed) a counter-intelligence operation, not a criminal investigation. So, you, calling the criminal investigation a farce, are just soiling yourself, twice over.
And yes, a person mis-remembering and therefore telling an untruth, and a person remembering correctly and deliberately telling an untruth in order to deceive may look just alike, and the conclusion somebody lied may be a judgment call. Is that news to you?
Podesta is registered to lobby on behalf of Sberbank CIB USA, Inc., a subsidiary of Russia's largest bank which is majority-owned by the government. We're not buying BWK's assumption that Podesta had nothing to do with Flynn's "illegal" activities. Flynn has called Gulen "a shady islamic mullah," and "radical islamist."
17 Jul 2016 Hillary Clinton Connected with Fethullah Gulen
(site not secure)
katehon.com/news/hillary-clinton-connected-fethullah-gulen
'....One Gulen movement leader, Recep Ozkan, donated between $500,000 and $1 million to the Clinton Foundation....'
Huh? Can you factually establish that Podesta had a thing to do with Flynn's illegal activity?
Because you "not 'buying that he wasn't"....doesn't amount to much.
Huh? Can you factually establish that Podesta had a thing to do with Flynn's illegal activity?
Because you "not 'buying that he wasn't"....doesn't amount to much.
See:
The probe of Podesta and his Democratic-leaning lobbying firm grew out of Mueller's inquiry into the finances of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, according to the sources. As special counsel, Mueller has been tasked with investigating possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Manafort had organized a public relations campaign for a non-profit called the European Centre for a Modern Ukraine (ECMU). Podesta's company was one of many firms that worked on the campaign, which promoted Ukraine's image in the West.
The sources said the investigation into Podesta and his company began as more of a fact-finding mission about the ECMU and Manafort's role in the campaign, but has now morphed into a criminal inquiry into whether the firm violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA.
...
A spokeswoman said the Podesta Group’s original filing was submitted after the advice of legal experts because the ECMU "had certified that it was neither funded nor directed by a foreign government or political party."
That doesn't even mention Flynn.
Did badger mean Manafort?
What value has Skylar placed on badger's disbelief? When did Skylar assume that everyone would also buy the signifier "illegal" that the rabid pit bull, Sullivan, has attached to the drama when report, Turkey's Coup Attempt A Boon for Lobbyists (see post #17) came within days of the Hillary Clinton-Gulen report? We believe Podesta-Clinton-Gulen is a "hot" investigative trajectory.
Was Podesta registered to lobby on behalf of Sberbank CIB USA, or not?
How do you know? Are you part of the investigation?Flynn's perjury trap is the best thing that ever happened to the crazy left wing. It inflames their hatred of the Military and the Trump administration even though it has nothing to do with the original allegation of "collusion".
9 Mar 2017 Sberbank Confirms Hiring Podesta Group for Lobbying Its Interests
(site not secure)
tass.com/economy/934699
Was Podesta registered to lobby on behalf of Sberbank CIB USA, or not?
