Merrick Garland to appoint Special Counsel in Mar-a-lago documents probe

[JimH52]

Congress won't be impeaching and convicting the AG. Do you really think that there would be a 2/3rds vote to convict in the Senate?

WW

The repubs created trump. Now that the walls are closing in...they want to blame someone else.

 

[MagicMike]

Shut yer Lyin Piehole Bub.There was Not one shred of evident to make
any case that President Trump assisted or encouraged the January 6th
Protests.How so.Because President Trump personally wrote a letter
to both D.C. Mayor Bowser and also Nancy Pelos Requesting they
call up between 10-20,ooo National Guard. Days before January 6th.
Pelosi refused to respond to the Letter that was sent to Muriel Bowser
and forwarded to Speaker Pelosi.Who is in charge {controls }
who runs Capitol Security.
Plus maybe Trump did keep some White House Docs.
Ones sheerly no more significant than as Momentos.
Like the Clintons didn't ransack the White House when leaving
with actual WH Property { Paintings,Furniture,Rugs and Crystal }.

Just hide and watch Karen.

• Retention of national defense information (18 USC § 793(e));
• Concealing government records (18 USC § 2071);
• Conversion of government property (18 USC § 641);
• Obstruction of justice (18 USC § 1519);
• Criminal contempt (18 USC § 402); and
• False statements to federal investigators (18 USC § 1001)

 

[Hutch Starskey]

And the AG has to play politics to get appointed by the politicians. Lie to yourself all you wish, but that is a fact and you, again, are wrong.

Nonsense.

 

[Catman51]

#1 You forgot Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Rose in your list of only active cabinet members held in contempt.

#2 Obama exerted executive privilege's over the documents that Holder didn't turn over and because of that there was no criminal prosecution. You can't send someone to jail without a prosecution.

WW

January 6 protestors says diffrerently.

 

[Catman51]

Congress won't be impeaching and convicting the AG. Do you really think that there would be a 2/3rds vote to convict in the Senate?

WW

If there were any integrity at all in the senate, yes.

 

[Catman51]

Nonsense.

Such a strong argument. Present no refuting facts, present no contrary facts, just make a highly idiotic statement and assume it to be correct. You truly represent the democrats and their way of doing things.

 

[Delldude]

Ugh... When has a special counsel ever produced a GOOD result.

When it isn't your party.

 

[Catman51]

Just hide and watch Karen.

• Retention of national defense information (18 USC § 793(e));
• Concealing government records (18 USC § 2071);
• Conversion of government property (18 USC § 641);
• Obstruction of justice (18 USC § 1519);
• Criminal contempt (18 USC § 402); and
• False statements to federal investigators (18 USC § 1001)

So you have listed the charges to be brought against the democrats. Everyone already knows this. Now make up some new lies about Trump.

 

[Catman51]

I hope you are right...but he has sneaked by so many crimes in the past few years. I will believe it when I see it.

If this were true it would prove the democrats are even more worthless than they present themselves to be.

 

[Foolardi]

Unless they have actual evidence of an actual crime, the Senate will likely not convict.

Not so fast.The democrats are notorious for stalling.
If a democrat gets found out being corrupt they take
their sweet time.Like the case of " Dollar Bill " Jefferson.
Caught red-handed with more than $ 400,ooo in his
Congressional office freezer.Around the time of Hurricane
Katrina.I wasn't until 2009 that his trial found him guilty.
Charged by a Grand Jury in summer of 2007 with 16 felony
charges.
In 2009 the verdict was 13 years Longest sentence ever handed
a Congressman.However did not start serving until May of 2012.
Then in December of 2017 a Christmas present arrives for
" Dollar Bill " in the form of having 7 counts of his 2009 conviction
tossed-out.Jefferson's lawyers cut a deal with the Fed and had his
sentence reduced to time served.A mere 5 years out of 13.
That is How Democrats Do Ya.
Like one big Yakety yak song.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Such a strong argument. Present no refuting facts, present no contrary facts, just make a highly idiotic statement and assume it to be correct. You truly represent the democrats and their way of doing things.

There’s no substance to refute. It’s simply empty words.

There’s no politics in being asked to be the AG, dope.

 

[WorldWatcher]

If there were any integrity at all in the senate, yes.

Well we know they have no integrity, they failed to convict Trump when he was impeached - twice.

WW

 

[Faun]

Not so fast.The democrats are notorious for stalling.
If a democrat gets found out being corrupt they take
their sweet time.Like the case of " Dollar Bill " Jefferson.
Caught red-handed with more than $ 400,ooo in his
Congressional office freezer.Around the time of Hurricane
Katrina.I wasn't until 2009 that his trial found him guilty.
Charged by a Grand Jury in summer of 2007 with 16 felony
charges.
In 2009 the verdict was 13 years Longest sentence ever handed
a Congressman.However did not start serving until May of 2012.
Then in December of 2017 a Christmas present arrives for
" Dollar Bill " in the form of having 7 counts of his 2009 conviction
tossed-out.Jefferson's lawyers cut a deal with the Fed and had his
sentence reduced to time served.A mere 5 years out of 13.
That is How Democrats Do Ya.
Like one big Yakety yak song.

Do you even realize none of that has anything at all to do with what I posted?

 

[Foolardi]

There’s no substance to refute. It’s simply empty words.

There’s no politics in being asked to be the AG, dope.

Yeah right Pops.Like Eric Holder,eh.
Why not just say there's No Politics being played by
Al Sharpton.The converse of truth.Only visited Obama's
White House more than 100 times.

 

[Foolardi]

Do you even realize none of that has anything at all to do with what I posted?

Well then throw yerself a Tizzy Fit Party.

 

[beautress]

I'm wondering. You are quick to point out perceived bias by anyone. The people you are arguing with, and Garland. Does it occur to you, that your bias might cause you to not consider the facts as they are?

Let me give you my perspective which is not unbiased but at least shows awareness that bias makes a person not always rational.

Garland has allowed Durham to continue his investigation. Garland did NOT have to appoint a special prosecutor. The special prosecutor he did appoint is a registered independent.

Trump not just took government documents that where highly classified. He kept them when the government asked for them. Got subpoenaed for them, and lied about his compliance to that subpoena. There is ample precedent of people going to jail for fewer, less vital documents, and a less clear cut way of avoiding responsibility for taking the documents.

4th Amendment.

 

[beautress]

The House is not authorized to give AG Garland a "pink slip".

What they can do is impeach AG Garland, to do that it takes a majority of the House. With the paper thin majority that the GOP will have in the House that is unlikely. Then it goes to the Senate where the DEMs have the majority and it takes 2/3rds of the Senate to convict for impeachment. Unless AG Garland is impeached for shooting a passerby on 5th Avenue, there would be no conviction.

And only upon conviction can then AG Garland be handed a pink slip from the Congress.

WW

They could pull a resignation from the partisan pos.

 

[Lastamender]

Why do you say there have been no results?

Obviously there has been enough evidence of criminal behavior discovered to warrant the appointment of a Special Prosecutor.

Obviously, the Russian hoax proved they can investigate nothing for three years. Why is this any different?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yeah right Pops.Like Eric Holder,eh.
Why not just say there's No Politics being played by
Al Sharpton.The converse of truth.Only visited Obama's
White House more than 100 times.

Huh?

 

[WorldWatcher]

They could pull a resignation from the partisan pos.

Could you try this again in English please. Not sure what you mean.

WW