Merrick Garland to appoint Special Counsel in Mar-a-lago documents probe

[Frankenstein]

Still requires Evidence and Witnesses under oath.
Not some silly ass Whistleblower whose identity is not
known.I think that broke protocol when a Whistleblower
was used to tag Trump's " perfect phone call " with newly
elected President Zelensky..Said Whistleblower was anonymous and
never required to come forward and testify.Just some sneaky
back room House deal where snarky House Intelligence Chair
Adam Schiff somehow immunized this anonymous Whistleblower
who was used as the Basis for Trump's First Impeachment.
Garland himself will be a subject of the New House oversight
Committee.He best be careful what he pulls.

Yep he is nothing but a weapon against Biden's political opponenets, pretty crazy they pulled this crap right after Trump committed to run again!

 

[WorldWatcher]

The House.

The House is not authorized to give AG Garland a "pink slip".

What they can do is impeach AG Garland, to do that it takes a majority of the House. With the paper thin majority that the GOP will have in the House that is unlikely. Then it goes to the Senate where the DEMs have the majority and it takes 2/3rds of the Senate to convict for impeachment. Unless AG Garland is impeached for shooting a passerby on 5th Avenue, there would be no conviction.

And only upon conviction can then AG Garland be handed a pink slip from the Congress.

WW

 

[Foolardi]

I heard the actual audio and Trump never said do it legally. The mere fact an actual candidate would personally call an election official and talk about votes counted, is improper and illegal.

Out of 4.5 million votes cast, only 4 people were convicted of voter fraud. That's not enough to turn an election.

He was in possession of classified documents when he was not President. That is a crime. BTW, the President does not have the authority to declassify documents related to national security. That is the job of the defense Secretary.

Wake the **** up, the President is not a dictator!

We're finding out more each day as to just How this Trust Fund
Brat and oversized baby { *Baby Huey } won election.It was rigged.
Ballot Harvesting using College Campus.

* John Fetterman.

 

[Catman51]

The AG isn’t a politician. They’re appointed by politicians. A special counsel is appointed by the AG independent of politicians.

And the AG has to play politics to get appointed by the politicians. Lie to yourself all you wish, but that is a fact and you, again, are wrong.

 

[Catman51]

The appointment is to trump's advantage, even as he plays the victim....again.

Those magic mushrooms must be potent for you to think this.

 

[Foolardi]

The House is not authorized to give AG Garland a "pink slip".

What they can do is impeach AG Garland, to do that it takes a majority of the House. With the paper thin majority that the GOP will have in the House that is unlikely. Then it goes to the Senate where the DEMs have the majority and it takes 2/3rds of the Senate to convict for impeachment. Unless AG Garland is impeached for shooting a passerby on 5th Avenue, there would be no conviction.

And only upon conviction can then AG Garland be handed a pink slip from the Congress.

WW

However the move was made to take out Eric Holder.
For his sheer arrogance over the Operation known as :
Fast & Furious .
Holder was held in Contempt of Congress.The Only active cabinet
member in U.S. History to be charged and found guilty of Contempt.
The guy never spent 5 minutes behind bars.
So much for Democrats punishing their own.Highly Unlikely.

 

[Catman51]

Actually, it will end just fine. Trump in jail and the Republicans in disarray.

In your fevered, partisan dreams. And then only if you democrats try to and succeed in changing the laws, again, to suit your power grab

 

[Catman51]

Just wondering, who to you think is going to hand AG Garland a pink slip?

WW

How about congress when they impeach him?

 

[Catman51]

The house does not have the authority to fire a member of the executive branch.

Yet they tried twice to impeach Trump. Puts to lie your statement.

 

[MagicMike]

This thread belongs in Conspiracy theories. They have been after Trump for 7 years and no results. If that does not make this a conspiracy what does?

Why do you say there have been no results?

Obviously there has been enough evidence of criminal behavior discovered to warrant the appointment of a Special Prosecutor.

 

[Foolardi]

Yet they tried twice to impeach Trump. Puts to lie your statement.

Today's Democrats aren't merely Drunk w/Power
they are virtually Retarded w/power.What else explains
their virtual assclown desperation to insure John Fetterman
gets into the Senate.Based on What.Name one godforsaken thing.
I mean,the Big Baby Huey has NO { not one inkling of Political
ability,let alone insight or wisdom }. Notice how Fast and Furious
Pelosi is now.To shy away from any limelight.using up all her political
capitol on dopey talk and egomania.NOT things that quantity and
qualify leadership.Ex . After her Loss in 2010 she refused to step down.
Even threw herself a congratulations party.Then proceeded to
rename House Leadership.Creating a new Tittle just for James
Clyburn. - House Assistant Minority Leader -.
More than likely to keep him squarely on Big Brother Democrats
Government Plantation.

 

[Foolardi]

Why do you say there have been no results?

Obviously there has been enough evidence of criminal behavior discovered to warrant the appointment of a Special Prosecutor.

Shut yer Lyin Piehole Bub.There was Not one shred of evident to make
any case that President Trump assisted or encouraged the January 6th
Protests.How so.Because President Trump personally wrote a letter
to both D.C. Mayor Bowser and also Nancy Pelos Requesting they
call up between 10-20,ooo National Guard. Days before January 6th.
Pelosi refused to respond to the Letter that was sent to Muriel Bowser
and forwarded to Speaker Pelosi.Who is in charge {controls }
who runs Capitol Security.
Plus maybe Trump did keep some White House Docs.
Ones sheerly no more significant than as Momentos.
Like the Clintons didn't ransack the White House when leaving
with actual WH Property { Paintings,Furniture,Rugs and Crystal }.

 

[beautress]

Actually, it will end just fine. Trump in jail and the Republicans in disarray.

Boy, the deep state played their tricks on you, Mr. JoeB131. Trump does no wrongs in business dealings, and Republicans are quite resilient as people of fair standards and strength.

 

[beautress]

The House is not authorized to give AG Garland a "pink slip".

What they can do is impeach AG Garland, to do that it takes a majority of the House. With the paper thin majority that the GOP will have in the House that is unlikely. Then it goes to the Senate where the DEMs have the majority and it takes 2/3rds of the Senate to convict for impeachment. Unless AG Garland is impeached for shooting a passerby on 5th Avenue, there would be no conviction.

And only upon conviction can then AG Garland be handed a pink slip from the Congress.

WW

I was referring to impeachment. You're counting on all Democrats to ignore the one-sidedness of the AG. Good people demand that justice be blind.

 

[Faun]

How about congress when they impeach him?

Unless they have actual evidence of an actual crime, the Senate will likely not convict.

 

[WorldWatcher]

However the move was made to take out Eric Holder.
For his sheer arrogance over the Operation known as :
Fast & Furious .
Holder was held in Contempt of Congress.The Only active cabinet
member in U.S. History to be charged and found guilty of Contempt.
The guy never spent 5 minutes behind bars.
So much for Democrats punishing their own.Highly Unlikely.

#1 You forgot Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Rose in your list of only active cabinet members held in contempt.

#2 Obama exerted executive privilege's over the documents that Holder didn't turn over and because of that there was no criminal prosecution. You can't send someone to jail without a prosecution.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

I was referring to impeachment. You're counting on all Democrats to ignore the one-sidedness of the AG. Good people demand that justice be blind.

Impeachment doesn't remove people from office. As we saw with Trump - twice.

It takes conviction in the Senate.

It's very unlikely that articles of impeachment will (re: AG) make it through the House and there is no way on God's green Earth that the AG being impeached for recovering illegally held classified Documents from MAL will result in conviction.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

How about congress when they impeach him?

Congress won't be impeaching and convicting the AG. Do you really think that there would be a 2/3rds vote to convict in the Senate?

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

I was referring to impeachment. You're counting on all Democrats to ignore the one-sidedness of the AG. Good people demand that justice be blind.

You mean like the GOP's one-sideness to ignore the shenanigan's of Trump for which he was impeached gut the GOP would not convict in the Senate?

Those kinds of one-sidedness?

WW

 

[JimH52]

Actually, it will end just fine. Trump in jail and the Republicans in disarray.

I hope you are right...but he has sneaked by so many crimes in the past few years. I will believe it when I see it.