Merrick Garland Hides Joe Biden’s Scandalous Recordings in Top-Secret Facility

[struth]

Not absolute knowledge.

I simply do a document search for all the false narrative words Trump supporters use and when it's not there I call them out in it.


He isn't. Hurr already determined that.

I'm sorry you can't accept it.

Willfully means no intent! Hahah

 

[Catsnmeters]

Yeah it’s apparent that’s where you get your talking points

HAhaa willfully means no intent! Haha

They aren't talking points.

They are directly from Hurr's report.

I've never seen the view. The only I know about it is whoopie Goldberg is in it. I liked as a bartender in the enterprise but have no interest in the show.

You are flailing because the actual report undermines all the right wing talking points you have been told to parrot.

 

[struth]

They aren't talking points.

They are directly from Hurr's report.

I've never seen the view. The only I know about it is whoopie Goldberg is in it. I liked as a bartender in the enterprise but have no interest in the show.

You are flailing because the actual report undermines all the right wing talking points you have been told to parrot.

No they aren’t talking points they are simply lies

Willfully means no intent! Haha

 

[Catsnmeters]

Willfully means no intent! Hahah

No, willful means intent.

The issue is hurr stated Biden thought the documents were his to keep so yes, he had intent to keep the documents but not to break the law.

That is why context matters, not your cherry picked statements with your own narrative.

 

[Catsnmeters]

No they aren’t talking points they are simply lies

Willfully means no intent! Haha

Now hurr lied in his report.

Good grief.

Your desperation is palpable.

 

[struth]

Now hurr lied in his report.

Good grief.

Your desperation is palpable.

Haha when did i say he lied? I literally quoted him

 

[Catsnmeters]

Haha when did i say he lied? I literally quoted him

You forget already your post in response to my copy pasting parts of the Hurr document?

Post 83...

"No they aren’t talking points they are simply lies"

 

[struth]

You forget already your post in response to my copy pasting parts of the Hurr document?

Post 83...

"No they aren’t talking points they are simply lies"

I didn’t quote Hurr in response to anything you quoted from his report.

I posted it in response to your lies. To which you then claimed willfully means not intentional hahah

 

[Catsnmeters]

I didn’t quote Hurr in response to anything you quoted from his report.

I posted it in response to your lies. To which you then claimed willfully means not intentional hahah

I quoted Hurr's report.

You said they were lies and then started yammering about the view.

My post 64...your response post 67.

You called hurr a liar.

 

[struth]

I quoted Hurr's report.

You said they were lies and then started yammering about the view.

My post 64...your response post 67.

You called hurr a liar.

I quoted his report, willfully.

Post 48.

quote me calling him a liar

 

[Catsnmeters]

I quoted his report, willfully.

Post 48.

quote me calling him a liar

See post 89.

 

[struth]

See post 89.

Nowhere in any of my post did I call him a liar.

You lie.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Nowhere in any of my post did I call him a liar.

You lie.

Ok. You didn't.

Doesn't matter.

That just means you must support Hurr's assessment.

A grand jury wouldn't indict.

Thanks for that.

 

[struth]

Ok. You didn't.

Doesn't matter.

That just means you must support Hurr's assessment.

A grand jury wouldn't indict.

Thanks for that.

He didn’t say a grand jury wouldn’t indict

I do agree with it, i agree xiden stole and disclosed classified material.

And I agree we don’t prosecute senile people.

 

[Catsnmeters]

He didn’t say a grand jury wouldn’t indict

Who do you think he was referring to here...

However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the evidence
does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Prosecution of Mr.
Biden is also unwarranted based on our consideration of the aggravating and
mitigating factors set forth in the Department of Justice's Principles of Federal
Prosecution. For these reasons, we decline prosecution of Mr. Biden.

I do agree with it, i agree xiden stole and disclosed classified material.

And I agree we don’t prosecute senile people.

The report doesn't say senile.

You are creating your own narrative again.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Nowhere in any of my post did I call him a liar.

You lie.

Do you think Trump's document case is the same as Biden's and Trump shouldn't be under indictment?

 

[struth]

Who do you think he was referring to here...

However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the evidence
does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Prosecution of Mr.
Biden is also unwarranted based on our consideration of the aggravating and
mitigating factors set forth in the Department of Justice's Principles of Federal
Prosecution. For these reasons, we decline prosecution of Mr. Biden.


The report doesn't say senile.

You are creating your own narrative again.

Yes the mitigating factors that he is senile.

 

[struth]

Do you think Trump's document case is the same as Biden's and Trump shouldn't be under indictment?

No they aren’t the same. Xiden willfully stole and discloused classified material

Trump didn’t

 

[Catsnmeters]

No they aren’t the same. Xiden willfully stole and discloused classified material

Trump didn’t

So you do think Hurr is a liar....or maybe you think the things he says that you like is the truth and if you don't like it it's a lie?

Is that how it works?

The following is from the Hurr report; not the view.

The exception is former President Trump. It is not our role to
assess the criminal charges pending against Mr. Trump, but several material
distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence
involving Mr. Biden, the allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if
proven, would present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite. According
to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, but
he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about
it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National Archives and
the Department of Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with the
investigation.

With one exception, there is no record of the Department ofJustice prosecuting
a former president or vice president for mishandling classified documents from his
own administration. The exception is former President Trump. is not our role to
assess the criminal charges pending against Mr. Trump, but several material
distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and Mr. Eiden's are clear. Unlike the evidence
involving Mr. Biden, the allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump,
proven, would clearly establish not only Mr. Trump's willfulness but also serious
aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite According
to the • not refused to return documents for months, but he
also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to about
95 ,i In contrast, Mr. Eiden alerted authorities, turned in classified documents to the
National Archives and the Department of Justice in 2022 and 2023, consented to the
search of multiple locations including his homes, permitted the seizure and review of
handwritten notebooks he believed to be his personal property, and in numerous
other ways cooperated with the investigation. 956

 

[struth]

So you do think Hurr is a liar....or maybe you think the things he says that you like is the truth and if you don't like it it's a lie?

Is that how it works?

The following is from the Hurr report; not the view.

The exception is former President Trump. It is not our role to
assess the criminal charges pending against Mr. Trump, but several material
distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence
involving Mr. Biden, the allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if
proven, would present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite. According
to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, but
he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about
it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National Archives and
the Department of Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with the
investigation.

With one exception, there is no record of the Department ofJustice prosecuting
a former president or vice president for mishandling classified documents from his
own administration. The exception is former President Trump. is not our role to
assess the criminal charges pending against Mr. Trump, but several material
distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and Mr. Eiden's are clear. Unlike the evidence
involving Mr. Biden, the allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump,
proven, would clearly establish not only Mr. Trump's willfulness but also serious
aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite According
to the • not refused to return documents for months, but he
also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to about
95 ,i In contrast, Mr. Eiden alerted authorities, turned in classified documents to the
National Archives and the Department of Justice in 2022 and 2023, consented to the
search of multiple locations including his homes, permitted the seizure and review of
handwritten notebooks he believed to be his personal property, and in numerous
other ways cooperated with the investigation. 956

Where did I say he was a liar?