Merrick Garland Hides Joe Biden’s Scandalous Recordings in Top-Secret Facility

[Catsnmeters]

The report I read, Hur pointed out in Biden's career he was well aware of the procedures for handling classified documents.

Link please. Context matters.

And it's obvious you didn't read it in its entirety.

You see the part where Hur mentioned, something to the effect, that Biden thought he was still VP, wasn't sure what day it was and several other things.......that is the main reason Garland doesn't want to release the audio of the interview.........it's loaded with embarrassing gaffs.

No, that isn't the reason. Biden messed up a couple questions and couldn't remember some dates.

Most people do when under a long interview like that.

 

[Delldude]

Link please. Context matters.

You're the one crowing about the content in the investigation, go look it up yourself.

No, that isn't the reason. Biden messed up a couple questions and couldn't remember some dates.

Yes it is.................He messed up quite a bit, that's why the WH statement claimed they edited it and left in wording so no material facts were changed. Just left out Biden's stammering, verbal stumbling, etc.

 

[Independent thinker]

This is ridiculous if true. And being that Biden and Garland are involved, I have little doubt this is true.

Yea, but Trump is a threat to the Republic. FFS.

​

Reportedly, Attorney General Merrick Garland has designated the audio tapes of Joe Biden’s embarrassing interview with Special Counsel Hur as “classified at the highest level.” Investigative journalist Paul Sperry has stated that these tapes are being kept in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF).​

​

Earlier this year, Washington Post reporter Matt Viser disclosed that Special Counsel Robert Hur found that Joe Biden carelessly mishandled sensitive materials found at his home and former office.​

​

In a troubling revelation, the investigation also uncovered that Biden shared government secrets with his ghostwriter, highlighting his blatant disregard for national security.​

​

Additionally, it was revealed that during interviews with the Special Counsel, Biden struggled to answer even basic questions, such as when he served as Vice President or the year his son Beau passed away from brain cancer.​

​

Despite this damning report, the Department of Justice chose not to press charges against Biden. They cited concerns that a jury might consider him too mentally incompetent to stand trial.​

​

The damning report reads, in part:​

​

​

​

​

...​

​

According to reports, Attorney General Merrick Garland has designated audio recordings of Joe Biden’s interview with Special Counsel Hur as highly classified.​

​

These tapes are said to contain a series of incoherent comments made by Biden during a two-day questioning session and have been stored in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF), known for safeguarding the country’s most sensitive information.​

​

This information comes from conservative investigative journalist Paul Sperry.​

​

“Attorney General Merrick Garland has classified at the highest level the audio tapes of Biden’s embarrassingly incoherent interview with Special Counsel Hur over two days, and has locked the tapes away in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, or SCIF,” Sperry wrote.​

​

​

​

Merrick Garland Hides Joe Biden’s Scandalous Recordings in Top-Secret Facility

Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. Reportedly, Attorney General Merrick Garland has designated the audio tapes of Joe Biden’s embarrassing interview with...

libertyonenews.com

That's weird. I heard Biden was keeping them in his garage.

 

[Catsnmeters]

yeah, where does it say there was no intent? Oh it doesn't.

Yeah...ok it doesn't. Lol.

The below is just a few of many references.

And his cooperation with our investigation, including by reporting to the
government that the Afghanistan documents were in his Delaware garage, will likely
convince some jurors that he made an innocent mistake, rather than acting
willfully-that is, with intent to break the law-as the statute requires.

Just as with retention, disclosure under Section 793(e) requires that the
defendant act willfully-that is, with the intent to do something the law forbids. ,G:l A
person is not entitled to receive national defense information if he or she lacks a need
to know and an appropriate clearance as required by the executive order.

At trial, we expect Mr. Eiden to offer similar evidence of his subjective
understanding. Such evidence would be admissible as to the element of willfulness,which requires proof that Mr. Eiden acted with intent to do something the law
forbids. 899 And we expect the evidence of Mr. Biden's state of mind to be compelling-
clear, forceful testimony that he did, in fact, believe he was allowed to have the
notebooks. While the government could question this testimony's veracity as a
convenient answer perhaps suggested by his attorneys after the discovery of his
classified notebooks, such a suggestion lacks evidentiary support and Mr. Biden's
testimony will likely carry significant weight with many jurors.

The exception is former President Trump. It is not our role to
assess the criminal charges pending against Mr. Trump, but several material
distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence
involving Mr. Biden, the allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if
proven, would present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite. According
to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, but
he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about
it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National Archives and
the Department of Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with the
investigation.

There are mitigating factors, as the report goes on to say, we don't prosecute senile people in the United States.

The word senile is not in the report.

 

[Delldude]

That's weird. I heard Biden was keeping them in his garage.

It was a Secure Corvette Information Facility.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Why are we talking about this? For starters because Joe Biden's DOJ is going after Trump for possessing classified materials...WHEN JOE BIDEN HAS ILLEGALLY POSSESSED CLASSIFIED MATERIALS DATING BACK TO WHEN HE WAS A SENATOR! Do you not grasp the hypocrisy in that?

Donald denied, lied, and obstructed. Joe did none of those things.

 

[struth]

Yeah...ok it doesn't. Lol.

The below is just a few of many references.

And his cooperation with our investigation, including by reporting to the
government that the Afghanistan documents were in his Delaware garage, will likely
convince some jurors that he made an innocent mistake, rather than acting
willfully-that is, with intent to break the law-as the statute requires.

Just as with retention, disclosure under Section 793(e) requires that the
defendant act willfully-that is, with the intent to do something the law forbids. ,G:l A
person is not entitled to receive national defense information if he or she lacks a need
to know and an appropriate clearance as required by the executive order.

At trial, we expect Mr. Eiden to offer similar evidence of his subjective
understanding. Such evidence would be admissible as to the element of willfulness,which requires proof that Mr. Eiden acted with intent to do something the law
forbids. 899 And we expect the evidence of Mr. Biden's state of mind to be compelling-
clear, forceful testimony that he did, in fact, believe he was allowed to have the
notebooks. While the government could question this testimony's veracity as a
convenient answer perhaps suggested by his attorneys after the discovery of his
classified notebooks, such a suggestion lacks evidentiary support and Mr. Biden's
testimony will likely carry significant weight with many jurors.

The exception is former President Trump. It is not our role to
assess the criminal charges pending against Mr. Trump, but several material
distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence
involving Mr. Biden, the allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if
proven, would present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite. According
to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, but
he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about
it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National Archives and
the Department of Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with the
investigation.


The word senile is not in the report.

You need to stop getting your news from The View.


Haha “willfully” means he doesn’t have intent! Hahaha you dembot! Haha

 

[Delldude]

And his cooperation with our investigation, including by reporting to the
government that the Afghanistan documents were in his Delaware garage, will likely
convince some jurors that he made an innocent mistake, rather than acting
willfully-that is, with intent to break the law-as the statute requires.

You miss the point here that Hur is referring to defense making light of it being an innocent mistake.

Yet he also said this:

Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen.

 

[Catsnmeters]

You're the one crowing about the content in the investigation, go look it up yourself.

You don't like context do you? Lol.

It's not my job to research your vague claims.

Yes it is.................He messed up quite a bit, that's why the WH statement claimed they edited it and left in wording so no material facts were changed. Just left out Biden's stammering, verbal stumbling, etc.

So what? This doesn't mean Biden is guilty.

Hurr chose not to indict.

Why are you still talking about this?

 

[Delldude]

Yet to be proven in a court of law.

Joe did none of those things.

Every document Biden had was stolen.

 

[Catsnmeters]

You need to stop getting your news from The View.


Haha “willfully” means he doesn’t have intent! Hahaha you dembot! Haha

The view?

Those copy pasted are directly from Hurr's report. Lol.

You are embarrassing yourself.

 

[Catsnmeters]

You miss the point here that Hur is referring to defense making light of it being an innocent mistake.

Yet he also said this:

I didn't forget. Hurr went on to say he couldn't prove Joe knew he shouldn't take them.

Again, context matter.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yet to be proven in a court of law.



Every document Biden had was stolen.

Joe did not do any of the things Trump is charged with. FFS, people here have had to spell this out for you how many times?

If you are going to troll to get attention, at least pay attention to the responses.

 

[Delldude]

It's not my job to research your vague claims.

You're the one who, post by post, is claiming some kind of absolute knowledge of the contents of the investigation.....yet have no knowledge of it when pressed.

I read the whole phucking thing, probably twice.

Why are you still talking about this?

You are the one conducting a failed debate on this thread..................you tell me.

So what? This doesn't mean Biden is guilty.

He would be indictable.

 

[Delldude]

I didn't forget. Hurr went on to say he couldn't prove Joe knew he shouldn't take them.

Again, context matter.

Hur said Biden knew better............again, an indictable offense.

 

[Delldude]

Joe did not do any of the things Trump is charged with.

Didn't say he did, he only stole classified material from DC as a sitting Senator, possessed classified documents as a private citizen and at no time whatsoever did he have the authoritiy to do what he did.

That's all................

 

[struth]

The view?

Those copy pasted are directly from Hurr's report. Lol.

You are embarrassing yourself.

Yeah it’s apparent that’s where you get your talking points

HAhaa willfully means no intent! Haha

 

[Independent thinker]

It was a Secure Corvette Information Facility.

Is this the one?

 

[Catsnmeters]

You're the one who, post by post, is claiming some kind of absolute knowledge of the contents of the investigation.....yet have no knowledge of it when pressed.

I read the whole phucking thing, probably twice.

Not absolute knowledge.

I simply do a document search for all the false narrative words Trump supporters use and when it's not there I call them out in it.

You are the one conducting a failed debate on this thread..................you tell me.

He would be indictable.

He isn't. Hurr already determined that.

I'm sorry you can't accept it.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Hur said Biden knew better............again, an indictable offense.

Again, you will need to copy paste these accusations.

Although it will be meaningless.

Hurr already said he didn't think he could get an indictment.