Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,899
- 1,530
And they still would not be charged for yelling fire but rather for something like inciting or endangerment or some such thingThat's true. That action has to create a panic to be illegal.Technically it's not illegal.Oh? Then why is it illegal to yell "fire" in a crowded theater while knowing there is no fire? Do you think your First Amendment rights allow you to expose others to danger?Ha, so selfish it boggles the mind. Who said Anything about “ever” anyway. Did I mention how selfish you appear to be???And the freedom to infect everyone around you! Yes!Good to see we still have freedom of religion in America.
It seems you have very little imagination for this sort of thing but let me clue you in: this is exactly how your freedom is taken, and mine. I mean not that anyone cares about that anymore, right? But still. YOU can't congregate in groups ever anymore, because my neighbor's sister's niece is immuno-compromised, and viruses get around, and it's DANGEROUS
Congrats for being part of the big problem: whipping us into a nation of window-peeping Gestapos. Hope you're proud
I really don't care if you feel my First Amendment Rights are selfish. For now, they are still my rights. I know you probably care little for them.
If someone shouted fire in a crowded theater and people told him to shut up and leave he would not be charged with any crime.
"The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic." ~ Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes