Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Excellent link. Notice how 2020 was much more La Nina than ENSO neutral, yet nearly tied 2016 for the warmest year on record.One can see here how a series of decreasing values make up the temperature record.
Global Temperature
www.columbia.edu
Really? I need to spell it out for you?So what? Are you planning to make a point?
South Pole froze over in coldest winter on recordClicked on your link. "This site cannot be reached".
Looks like the sun is not cooperating with all the predictions of a Maunder Minimum.
Dingleberry, that was not a prediction, that link was to observation of what the sun is doing right now.I believe NASA's prediction was more in line with the Dalton minimum. They believe it's a great decade for space travel because of the reduced sun spot activity.
Excellent link. Notice how 2020 was much more La Nina than ENSO neutral, yet nearly tied 2016 for the warmest year on record.
View attachment 548008
Global Temperature
www.columbia.edu
And NASA's prediction was in line with the Dalton Minimum not the Maunder Minimum. So it appears that you are the only one who thinks it is unusual that cycle 25 is not matching the Maunder Minimum.Dingleberry, that was not a prediction, that link was to observation of what the sun is doing right now.
Still would not load. Apparently something in that site my computer protection does not like.
That's better,. Stick to your wheelhouse: Childish, simplistic views of the world and spending your days trying to annoy strangers on the internet. The world needs ditch diggers, too, after all.Don't look now, but your Bidenism is showing!!!!
View attachment 547925
Did you get wiped today?
View attachment 547927
No, you are confused. The last grand solar minimum was the Maunder Minimum. Another grand solar minimum was predicted to start occurring by now. The Dalton Minimum is not a grand solar minimum. One example:And NASA's prediction was in line with the Dalton Minimum not the Maunder Minimum. So it appears that you are the only one who thinks it is unusual that cycle 25 is not matching the Maunder Minimum.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
I didn't say the Dalton Minimum was a Grand Solar Minimum. And I don't know anyone who predicted a Grand Solar Minimum for Cycle 25.No, you are confused. The last grand solar minimum was the Maunder Minimum. Another grand solar minimum was predicted to start occurring by now. The Dalton Minimum is not a grand solar minimum. One example:
Modern Grand Solar Minimum will lead to terrestrial cooling
No, it didn't, not more than a few centimeters.The Fukashima earthquake shifted the earth's axis and increased the rotation of the earth.
You do now, because i linked you to one of many studies.I didn't say the Dalton Minimum was a Grand Solar Minimum. And I don't know anyone who predicted a Grand Solar Minimum for Cycle 25.
Except that study didn't predict that solar cycle 25 would be a Grand Solar Minimum so I still don't know anyone who is predicting solar cycle 25 will be a Grand Solar Minimum.You do now, because i linked you to one of many studies.
It's pretty much exactly what the study's author says, in the first paragraph...?Except that study didn't predict that solar cycle 25 would be a Grand Solar Minimum so I still don't know anyone who is predicting solar cycle 25 will be a Grand Solar Minimum.
But I do agree that it's not just a coincidence that Grand Solar Minimums lead to colder temperatures.
Looks like they were wrong about that, huh?It's pretty much exactly what the study's author says, in the first paragraph...?
But anyhoo, not germane. Yes, agreed, the idea is that solar minimums are a downward pressure on temps. But if you have enough other factors pushing up on temps, the temps could increase during a solar minimum anyway.
