- Sep 16, 2012
- 66,916
- 62,691
- 3,605
. . . but as I said, lots of smoke on that player'



Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dems can’t submit what they don’t have. The ethics committee has no jurisdiction over Gaetz anymore.The two are not related.
Any information about his character that is relevant and proven, the Democrats on the committee can submit at the confirmation hearings.
If it is REAL, it will come to light.
They investigated him for years and never charged him. THey didn't have shit to support the allegations.How do you know what they did or didn’t have?
No doubt there's many more "elections have consequences" moments on the way, gang!
![]()
What was the double standard? That’s the first time I was asked and that was my answer.So you have double standards. That I already knew.
It depends if they’re a democrat or a republican to you. That’s the truth.
What’s a realty show? Something to do with home sales?
They still have their report. They can release it.Dems can’t submit what they don’t have. The ethics committee has no jurisdiction over Gaetz anymore.
Your claim that lack of charges means they have “nothing” is a partisan rationalization to ignore the enormous red flags around Gaetz.What was the double standard? That’s the first time I was asked and that was my answer.
No it doesn’t. It might to you, but I don’t think we as a country should prosecute senile people…whatever their party
I do think we should prosecute sex crimes. Why do you think Harris and xiden didn’t?
I’ll wait to hear from the Republican chairman about that. I don’t think you have any idea if they can or not.They still have their report. They can release it.
No it’s actually it has nothing to do with his party. It means just that, there is no charges.Your claim that lack of charges means they have “nothing” is a partisan rationalization to ignore the enormous red flags around Gaetz.
Dude was paying sex traffickers. That’s bad.
I am not the "usual" Democrat. In fact, the reality is that I am intelligent and knowledgeable Independent. I have been voting AGAINST TRUMP but not because I am a Democrat but because I can't stand the man. He has no morals, ethics, principles or humanity and those are what rule my life.Well, that's a big change in direction from the usual that we saw democrats do. They couldn't let any discussion of QPJ's present go on without complaining about the past.
What’s stopping them? Why can’t Susan Wild (D) and ranking member tell us all what they found?I’ll wait to hear from the Republican chairman about that. I don’t think you have any idea if they can or not.
You said no charges means nothing to support allegations.No it’s actually it has nothing to do with his party. It means just that, there is no charges.
Is it? Then why are dems soft on sex crimes?
The chairman of the committee says they have no jurisdiction over him anymore. I don’t know if the rules allow them to vote on anything with regard to him.What’s stopping them? Why can’t Susan Wild (D) and ranking member tell us all what they found?
I didn’t say that at all.You said no charges means nothing to support allegations.
Except when it’s a Republican, obviously.
Ok, but they have the report and can release it.The chairman of the committee says they have no jurisdiction over him anymore. I don’t know if the rules allow them to vote on anything with regard to him.
We should know this week. If they don’t release the report, it will look VERY bad for him.
Of course you didn’t say that. It would require a level of honesty you’re not capable of.I didn’t say that at all.