Matt Gaetz Attorney General...

[Delldude]

But since so many have confirmed it, you won't believe it.

Everybody except law enforcement.

 

[MisterBeale]

Libs heads will explode now...

Some, not all. . .

 

[Marener]

Look... the DOJ brought up the charge to hurt Matt... they never had anything on him thus is why they dropped the case... but the harm was done... everyone in our government who thinks lawfare like this is a good political strategy are either going to resign or go to prison.... its that simple...

How do you know what they did or didn’t have?

If you are good buddies with a sex trafficker and laundering money to teenagers through him, you already are doing harm to yourself.

 

[Rambunctious]

How do you know what they did or didn’t have?

If you are good buddies with a sex trafficker and laundering money to teenagers through him, you already are doing harm to yourself.

If they had anything the case would have not been closed...

 

[Marener]

If they had anything the case would have not been closed...

Is that your special standard for Republicans?

They never had anything on Wray, or Comey, or Strzok, or anyone else that you guys told us broke all these laws?

Dude was laundering money through a sex trafficker to teenagers. That’s NOT nothing.

 

[Rambunctious]

Is that your special standard for Republicans?

They never had anything on Wray, or Comey, or Strzok, or anyone else that you guys told us broke all these laws?

Dude was laundering money through a sex trafficker to teenagers. That’s NOT nothing.

Dude they had Strzok and his little piece of ass on tape... Busted... We all caught Wray lying about things like Trump wasn't shot by a bullet... same with Comey.... he is a fucking liar.... and the case was dropped because Geatz had a rock solid alibi and witnesses so Garland had to drop it...

 

[Marener]

Dude they had Strzok and his little piece of ass on tape... Busted... We all caught Wray lying about things like Trump wasn't shot by a bullet... same with Comey.... he is a fucking liar.... and the case was dropped because Geatz had a rock solid alibi and witnesses so Garland had to drop it...

Closed the investigation without any charges so that means they had nothing.

What are you talking about an alibi and witnesses? Source?

 

[Rambunctious]

Marener You are so misinformed its not funny... you really need to watch FOX... just for two weeks so you can see how many things have been held from you by the hate Trump MSM.... I'm sure you aren't stupid but you are missing facts...
Even the smartest people can sound stupid when they are misinformed....

 

[Marener]

Marener You are so misinformed its not funny... you really need to watch FOX... just for two weeks so you can see how many things have been held from you by the hate Trump MSM.... I'm sure you aren't stupid but you are missing facts...
Even the smartest people can sound stupid when they are misinformed....

Insult. Insult. Insult.

Not a way to sound very smart.

I’m merely pointing out your double standards. If they don’t file charges it means they had nothing, unless we are talking about people MAGA hates in which case not filing charges is meaningless.

Dude was paying a sex trafficker who paid teens. That doesn’t give you guys any red flags? Are you serious?

 

[MisterBeale]

He was buddies with a sex trafficker.

That’ll get some attention.

Did he know that his buddy was trafficking young women?

Matt Gaetz, Loyal for Years to Trump, Is Said to Have Sought a Blanket Pardon​

The congressman was at the time under investigation over whether he violated sex trafficking laws, though it was unclear what he knew of the inquiry.

https://archive.ph/i4A4p#selection-465.0-469.149

". . . A spokesman for Mr. Trump declined to comment. In response to the story, Mr. Trump released a statement on Wednesday morning saying that he had not discussed the pardon with Mr. Gaetz.

“Congressman Matt Gaetz has never asked me for a pardon,” Mr. Trump said. “It must also be remembered that he has totally denied the accusations against him.”

Mr. Gaetz has denied having sex with a 17-year-old or paying for sex. A spokesman denied that he privately requested a pardon in connection with the continuing Justice Department inquiry. . . . "

The sex-trafficking investigation that’s zeroing in on Matt Gaetz, explained​

https://archive.ph/ZSUbr#selection-333.0-333.77

". . . What he has said: He’s been pretty vocal about denying paying for sex or having sex with a minor as an adult. “I have a suspicion that someone is trying to recategorize my generosity to ex-girlfriends as something more untoward,” he’s said.

“The last time I had a sexual relationship with a seventeen year old, I was seventeen,” he’s said. He’s also said, somewhat opaquely, that this derives from an actual extortion plot regarding his father, a wealthy former Florida politician.

How the investigation got started: It derives from a federal investigation into a friend of Gaetz’s, a wealthy Florida politician named Joel Greenberg who is now a convicted sex trafficker. Investigators started looking into whether Greenberg made up a sexual misconduct allegation to smear his opponent during a county tax collector race, and the investigation expanded to sexual trafficking and to Gaetz, as reported by The Washington Post’s Matt Zapotosky and Michael Scherer. . . "

Career prosecutors recommend no charges for Gaetz in sex-trafficking probe​

Investigators see credibility challenges for two main witnesses in a probe of the congressman’s alleged past dealings with a then-17-year-old​

https://archive.ph/3HK6F#selection-327.0-331.141

" .. . . Career prosecutors have recommended against charging Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) in a long-running sex-trafficking investigation — telling Justice Department superiors that a conviction is unlikely in part because of credibility questions with the two central witnesses, according to people familiar with the matter.

Senior department officials have not made a final decision on whether to charge Gaetz, but it is rare for such advice to be rejected, these people told The Washington Post, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss the deliberations. They added that it is always possible additional evidence emerges that could alter prosecutors’ understanding of the case.

Nevertheless, it is unlikely that federal authorities will charge Gaetz with a crime in an investigation that started in late 2020 and focused on his alleged involvement with a 17-year-old girl several years earlier. Gaetz, 40, has repeatedly denied wrongdoing, saying he has never paid for sex. He has also said the only time he had sex with a 17-year-old was when he was also 17. . . "

Hell of a lot of smoke created for no apparent fire.

 

[MisterBeale]

I’m merely pointing out your double standards. If they don’t file charges it means they had nothing, unless we are talking about people MAGA hates in which case not filing charges is meaningless.

True.

Dude was paying a sex trafficker who paid teens.

Not proven.

It does look sus, but there is in fact more evidence that the Biden's were selling influence, than there is evidence of this narrative.

 

[Marener]

Not proven.

It does look sus, but there is in fact more evidence that the Biden's were selling influence, than there is evidence of this narrative.

No, we have the public Venmo transactions.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/547280-gaetz-paid-accused-sex-trafficker-who-later-sent-same-amount-of-cash-to-teen/

 

[hadit]

I am not going to discuss the past because now that Trump was elected, the past is not important.

This is now about the future and what will happen. It is about what Trump does and the people he chooses. He is doing that right now and that is what is discussable

Well, that's a big change in direction from the usual that we saw democrats do. They couldn't let any discussion of QPJ's present go on without complaining about the past.

 

[Delldude]

If they had anything the case would have not been closed...

Oh no..............not lawfare again?

 

[MisterBeale]

No, we have the public Venmo transactions.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/547280-gaetz-paid-accused-sex-trafficker-who-later-sent-same-amount-of-cash-to-teen/

O.K.

I will revise my statement of, "there is in fact more evidence that the Biden's were selling influence."

The public can go find and look at all of the evidence that the allegations of influence peddling are based on.

In this article? We are TOLD the evidence exists, but I suspect if I tried to find it, I would not be able to.

I'd like to see the COMPLETE financial records of both Gaetz and Greenberg, to see how many payments, it what amounts, Gaetz sent, and how many payments, & in what amounts Greenberg sent.

This is a case of selective information provided by The Hill, without a complete record, it could very well be a coincidental.

Not only that, some of the narrative doesn't make a lick of sense.

This line;
"second transaction “hit up _____,” with the alleged nickname of a young woman. "

If it is just a "nickname," of someone, why not reveal it to the public so we can decide if it is innocuous, or something real?

We just can't know, unless the person WANTS to believe there is something untoward between the two.

This statement?

"One of the women said Gaetz and Greenberg paid her to have sex with both of them, messages reviewed by The New York Times showed."

I'd like to see the statement, information on her, and why prosecutors did not think she was a reliable witness.


Where is the proof? Where are the Venmo transactions? I looked, this is all I found;

". . . This week, during the reporting of this story, Gaetz’s once-public list of Venmo transactions disappeared. Greenberg’s Venmo account is not currently publicly accessible. But The Daily Beast was able to obtain partial records of Greenberg’s past online transactions through a source. . . "

Gaetz Paid Accused Sex Trafficker, Who Then Venmo’d Teen​

https://archive.ph/qylR0#selection-957.0-957.119

The Strange Friendship That May Bring Down Matt Gaetz

Rep. Matt Gaetz’s sudden downfall largely mirrors—and may have been precipitated by—another Florida Republican with plenty of Gaetz-y qualities.

web.archive.org

What source? How about a screenshot or something that tells us what they found, rather than just making such claims?

 

[Rambunctious]

Insult. Insult. Insult.

Not a way to sound very smart.

I’m merely pointing out your double standards. If they don’t file charges it means they had nothing, unless we are talking about people MAGA hates in which case not filing charges is meaningless.

Dude was paying a sex trafficker who paid teens. That doesn’t give you guys any red flags? Are you serious?

Insult??? I didn't insult you... I'm trying to help you... you have been brainwashed for 8 years... like a cult member... you need help....

 

[Marener]

O.K.

I will revise my statement of, "there is in fact more evidence that the Biden's were selling influence."

The public can go find and look at all of the evidence that the allegations of influence peddling are based on.

In this article? We are TOLD the evidence exists, but I suspect if I tried to find it, I would not be able to.

I'd like to see the COMPLETE financial records of both Gaetz and Greenberg, to see how many payments, it what amounts, Gaetz sent, and how many payments, & in what amounts Greenberg sent.

This is a case of selective information provided by The Hill, without a complete record, it could very well be a coincidental.

Not only that, some of the narrative doesn't make a lick of sense.

This line;
"second transaction “hit up _____,” with the alleged nickname of a young woman. "

If it is just a "nickname," of someone, why not reveal it to the public so we can decide if it is innocuous, or something real?

We just can't know, unless the person WANTS to believe there is something untoward between the two.

This statement?

"One of the women said Gaetz and Greenberg paid her to have sex with both of them, messages reviewed by The New York Times showed."

I'd like to see the statement, information on her, and why prosecutors did not think she was a reliable witness.

Interesting that we were going to get all this information from the ethics committee but Gaetz suddenly resigned so that ends it.

 

[Marener]

Insult??? I didn't insult you... I'm trying to help you... you have been brainwashed for 8 years... like a cult member... you need help....

Dude was paying a sex trafficker and you don’t see any problems. You won’t even admit it!

 

[Delldude]

O.K.

I will revise my statement of, "there is in fact more evidence that the Biden's were selling influence."

The public can go find and look at all of the evidence that the allegations of influence peddling are based on.

In this article? We are TOLD the evidence exists, but I suspect if I tried to find it, I would not be able to.

I'd like to see the COMPLETE financial records of both Gaetz and Greenberg, to see how many payments, it what amounts, Gaetz sent, and how many payments, & in what amounts Greenberg sent.

This is a case of selective information provided by The Hill, without a complete record, it could very well be a coincidental.

Not only that, some of the narrative doesn't make a lick of sense.

This line;
"second transaction “hit up _____,” with the alleged nickname of a young woman. "

If it is just a "nickname," of someone, why not reveal it to the public so we can decide if it is innocuous, or something real?

We just can't know, unless the person WANTS to believe there is something untoward between the two.

This statement?

"One of the women said Gaetz and Greenberg paid her to have sex with both of them, messages reviewed by The New York Times showed."

I'd like to see the statement, information on her, and why prosecutors did not think she was a reliable witness.

I think Greenberg's allegations fell apart, IIRC.

 

[struth]

How do you know what they did or didn’t have?

If you are good buddies with a sex trafficker and laundering money to teenagers through him, you already are doing harm to yourself.

because if they had anything there would be a case and a conviction. The fact they didn't even have enough to go to trial means they had nothing.