Mathematically impossible to have won Pennsylvania

OP
Q

Quasar44

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
8,680
Reaction score
5,031
Points
918
Location
Las Vegas
Utterly mathematically impossible for Biden to have won Pennsylvania
These are the numbers from a mathematician.
On just the absentee ballots : even if Biden revived 80 percent of independent vote and 20 percent of Republican vote - he still would have lost !!
Its virtually over a 99.9 percent chance that T won Pennsylvania by hundreds of thousands

No way Biden could get 30 percent of republican vote and 90 percent of independent Lol

That's the problem and why this is going nowhere in the courts I think: note the words: NEARLY impossible. That means UNLIKELY. Or more specifically: UNLIKELY, but POSSIBLE. I know the stats of the election make Biden's win sound about as likely as catching lightning in a bottle---- nothing makes sense, it stinks to high heaven, but what the COURTS care about is EVIDENCE that it DIDN'T happen or COULDN'T have happened.

Saying that an event is NEARLY impossible is at best purely CIRCUMSTANTIAL. Like overturning a call on the football field, the courts will likely need CONCLUSIVE PROOF they can hold in their hands in order to justify overturning a presidential election as fraud.
This is not a football game !!
THis is the future of American democracy and we have ample evidence
 

Mac1958

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
79,338
Reaction score
23,643
Points
2,210
Location
Opposing Authoritarian Ideological Fundamentalism.
OP
Q

Quasar44

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
8,680
Reaction score
5,031
Points
918
Location
Las Vegas
How the hell do I have 6,500 posts here in only 6 months lol
 
OP
Q

Quasar44

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
8,680
Reaction score
5,031
Points
918
Location
Las Vegas

Maybe these states have access to better and more accurate information than talk radio and Trumpster websites.
They know it’s a fraud and they’re doing everything possible to not acknowledge anything
 

Mac1958

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
79,338
Reaction score
23,643
Points
2,210
Location
Opposing Authoritarian Ideological Fundamentalism.
Maybe these states have access to better and more accurate information than talk radio and Trumpster websites.
They know it’s a fraud and they’re doing everything possible to not acknowledge anything
You're being lied to. I can't make it any more plain than that.
 

Norman

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
31,256
Reaction score
15,062
Points
1,590

Maybe these states have access to better and more accurate information than talk radio and Trumpster websites.
Yes they do. In PA 0.0% of the mail in ballots thrown out, in contrast to the historical average of 1%, and 3% for new voters.

But move along, nothing to see here. Just make generic bullshit statements without backing them up with anything. I thought claims required evidence, but that standard is apparently only adhered to when convenient.
 
Last edited:

Mac1958

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
79,338
Reaction score
23,643
Points
2,210
Location
Opposing Authoritarian Ideological Fundamentalism.

Maybe these states have access to better and more accurate information than talk radio and Trumpster websites.
Yes they do. In PA 0.00% of the mail in ballots thrown out, in contrast to the historical average of 1%, and 3% for new voters.

But move along, nothing to see here. Just make generic bullshit statements without backing them up with anything. I thought claims required evidence, but that standard is apparently only adhered to when convenient.
Or, perhaps the "evidence" you have been provided by your "news" sources is distorted, exaggerated, or simply made up out of thin air, by people who have a vested professional interest in doing so.

Those people are not difficult to identify.
 

Norman

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
31,256
Reaction score
15,062
Points
1,590

Maybe these states have access to better and more accurate information than talk radio and Trumpster websites.
Yes they do. In PA 0.00% of the mail in ballots thrown out, in contrast to the historical average of 1%, and 3% for new voters.

But move along, nothing to see here. Just make generic bullshit statements without backing them up with anything. I thought claims required evidence, but that standard is apparently only adhered to when convenient.
Or, perhaps the "evidence" you have been provided by your "news" sources is distorted, exaggerated, or simply made up out of thin air, by people who have a vested professional interest in doing so.

Those people are not difficult to identify.
That data is from the "official sources" you tout.

Besides that, you really have NO evidence for your claim. You are now accusing the mathematician of doing his math wrong. I find that unlikely, but believe that if you wish.
 

Mac1958

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
79,338
Reaction score
23,643
Points
2,210
Location
Opposing Authoritarian Ideological Fundamentalism.

Maybe these states have access to better and more accurate information than talk radio and Trumpster websites.
Yes they do. In PA 0.00% of the mail in ballots thrown out, in contrast to the historical average of 1%, and 3% for new voters.

But move along, nothing to see here. Just make generic bullshit statements without backing them up with anything. I thought claims required evidence, but that standard is apparently only adhered to when convenient.
Or, perhaps the "evidence" you have been provided by your "news" sources is distorted, exaggerated, or simply made up out of thin air, by people who have a vested professional interest in doing so.

Those people are not difficult to identify.
That data is from the "official sources" you tout.
I wouldn't try to convince someone like you of anything. I just thought I'd toss that out there.

Good luck with this.
 

mdk

Diamond Member
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Sep 6, 2014
Messages
39,367
Reaction score
12,555
Points
1,930
I hope these group therapy sessions are helping ya'll deal with your feels.
Well, they only expose themselves to "facts" that they like. Their "fact" machine is very obedient. So maybe this stuff makes 'em happy.
Some people like being lead around by the nose. It's a kink.
 

Norman

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
31,256
Reaction score
15,062
Points
1,590

Maybe these states have access to better and more accurate information than talk radio and Trumpster websites.
Yes they do. In PA 0.00% of the mail in ballots thrown out, in contrast to the historical average of 1%, and 3% for new voters.

But move along, nothing to see here. Just make generic bullshit statements without backing them up with anything. I thought claims required evidence, but that standard is apparently only adhered to when convenient.
Or, perhaps the "evidence" you have been provided by your "news" sources is distorted, exaggerated, or simply made up out of thin air, by people who have a vested professional interest in doing so.

Those people are not difficult to identify.
That data is from the "official sources" you tout.
I wouldn't try to convince someone like you of anything. I just thought I'd toss that out there.

Good luck with this.
You couldn't convince anyone with the pure speculation.

Find the data he used, re-run the analysis, find a mistake... or find someone else who did that. Otherwise it's just pure speculation. As for the ballot rejection rates, the information has been out there since the election and has not been explained - other than by some democrat organization lobbying for extremely sketchy standards.

Because when mass mail in hits - that's what we need - no standards at all on the votes. It's because of the pandemic, if we don't remove all standards the pandemic mutates and kills us all. Something like that was the thought process - so far so that an unconstitutional law was passed.
 

toobfreak

Tungsten/Glass Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
33,957
Reaction score
18,473
Points
1,915
Location
On The Way Home To Earth
He did not win. Fraudulent votes were counted. The signatures... 0.00% rejection rate, unheard of in the history of mail in voting.

And therein lies the rub, Norm: Because the fraudulent ballots were counted, the state has deemed them VALID. Whether by stupidity or clever malfeasance, many states opened the doors WIDE OPEN to voting using Covid as their justification to the point that a scribble on the back of a pack of matches counts as a ballot.

ON THE SURFACE, the idea of the mail-ins seemed good enough--- the premise was that so many people WOULD NOT VOTE and be afraid to go to the poll because of the virus that they wanted to offer them an alternative.

IN THEORY, the result should have been a number of total people voting in this election fairly close to normal, perhaps just slightly down.

INSTEAD, we saw historic all time highs! Many states reporting MORE THAN 100% TURNOUT! That shouldn't have happened.

So does this mean that:
  1. A lot of people don't normally vote but would when they can mail one in? To a degree, mail in ballots have ALWAYS been available, if you had good reason you couldn't go to the poll.
  2. A lt of ballots were cast only because of the relaxed laws?
The problem is that the Democrats did POORLY in this election, and Biden did poorly as well. The one place he did well was in four voting districts over a 5 hour period where a massive deluge came in for him, all by mail in ballots!

It has been said that many Trump voters went to the poll to be sure their vote counted, but if you were a Biden voter and really wanted to vote AGAINST Trump, wouldn't you want your vote to count to?

IT IS A STATISTICAL ANOMALY that so many people of ONE PARTY but not the other would have one voting preference over the other. The problem is that once the envelop is opened and separated from the ballot, the damage is done.
 
Last edited:

Norman

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
31,256
Reaction score
15,062
Points
1,590
He did not win. Fraudulent votes were counted. The signatures... 0.00% rejection rate, unheard of in the history of mail in voting.

And therein lies the rub, Norm: Because the fraudulent ballots were counted, the state has deemed them VALID. Whether by stupidity or clever malfeasance, many states opened the doors WIDE OPEN to voting using Covid as their justification to the point that a scribble on the back of a pack of matches counts as a ballot.

ON THE SURFACE, the idea of the mail-ins seemed good enough--- the premise was that so many people WOULD NOT VOTE and be afraid to go to the poll because of the virus that they wanted to offer them an alternative.

IN THEORY, the result should have been a number of total people voting in this election fairly close to normal, perhaps just slightly down.

INSTEAD, we saw historic all time highs! Many states reporting MORE THAN 100% TURNOUT! That shouldn't have happened.

So does this mean that:
  1. A lot of people don't normally vote but would when they can mail one in? To a degree, mail in ballots have ALWAYS been available, if you had good reason you couldn't go to the poll.
  2. A lt of ballots were cast only because of the relaxed laws?
The problem is that the Democrats did POORLY in this election, and Biden did poorly as well. The one place he did well was in four voting districts over a 5 hour period where a massive deluge came in for him, all by mail in ballots!

It has been said that many Trump voters went t the poll to be sure their vote counted, but if you were a Biden voter and really wanted to vote AGAINST Trump, wouldn't you want your vote to count to?

IT IS A STATISTICAL ANOMALY that so many people of ONE PARTY but not the other would would have one voting preference over the other. The problem is that once the envelop is opened and separated from the ballot, the damage is done.
On the surface the mail in idea is a terrible, terrible idea. This is not the first time the farce has been questioned - and of course it's been outlawed elsewhere. If foreign countries tried to use this process Biden would probably invade them. Not to mention in PA it was likely unconstitutional according to the judge's injunction.

... unless, people want to cheat... Then it's a great idea.

PA used mail in voting in 2016 as well. They just did not remove all standards to catch fraud.
 

toobfreak

Tungsten/Glass Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
33,957
Reaction score
18,473
Points
1,915
Location
On The Way Home To Earth
... unless, people want to cheat... Then it's a great idea.
I guess that's why the 2005 Panel on Election Integrity and Reform with Jimmy Carter and James A Baker recommended that we not use mail in ballots, flagging them as a very high risk for corruption.
 
OP
Q

Quasar44

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
8,680
Reaction score
5,031
Points
918
Location
Las Vegas
I hope these group therapy sessions are helping ya'll deal with your feels.
It is making me way more angry and infuriated that the USA is an official banana republic
You know those people you trust to tell you what's happening? They want you this way. It makes them more money.
I have common sense and logic and can connect the dots !!
Entire election was so fraudulent it would have had Reagan losing
 

Norman

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
31,256
Reaction score
15,062
Points
1,590
On the surface the mail in idea is a terrible, terrible idea. This is not the first time the farce has been questioned - and of course it's been outlawed elsewhere. If foreign countries tried to use this process Biden would probably invade them. Not to mention in PA it was likely unconstitutional according to the judge's injunction.

Unless, people want to cheat... Then it's a great idea.
I have common sense and logic and can connect the dots !!
What I'm saying is that those dots may not be fully real.
And what we are saying is that they may be real. Certainly you have failed to refute any of it.

And when they may be real, they should be looked at. The signatures should be verified - as was promised in GA by the way... just for the promise to mystically disappear, I wonder why.

It's not rocket science.
 
OP
Q

Quasar44

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
8,680
Reaction score
5,031
Points
918
Location
Las Vegas
I hope these group therapy sessions are helping ya'll deal with your feels.
It is making me way more angry and infuriated that the USA is an official banana republic
You know those people you trust to tell you what's happening? They want you this way. It makes them more money.
I have common sense and logic and can connect the dots !!
Entire election was so fraudulent it would have had Reagan losing
What I'm saying is that those dots may not be fully real.
4 major cities all stopping their counts is unprecedented
I knew right there ..something was up
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top