Corn isn't an excellent example of evolution. Otherwise, you would have explained and still haven't.
This is an example of how atheists and their scientists make general assumptions and attribute it to evolution.
Thus, I discussed how corn is a GMO and is used as bad. Isn't mutation the driver for evolution? In this case, it's gene mutation. Isn't that an example of corn as evolution haha?
Actually, it is a serious topic as evolution and GMO foods are really bad.
10 GMO Foods You Must Avoid Eating
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) were once promoted as the future of agriculture and the industry of food in general. With an increasing world population and the development of new technologies in the field of agroindustry, companies – especially the corporate giant Monsanto – presented...veryhealthy.life
I gave you a link showing the radical transformation of Corn over 9,000 years, too bad you didn't read it.
Here is the simple definition:
Corn as shown in the link, changed radically over 9,000 years, a classic case of guided evolution of a plant. That is a fact you are trying hard to ignore with your silly deflection to GMO.
I haven't mentioned GMO for an obvious that seems to elude you, which is why it is a Red Herring fallacy.
You are just taking natural selection which what God gave us to help us farm and grow crops. It's not easy to farm and raise livestock today. The best foods are organic or the way we used to grow crops. This was long before evolution and is part of creation science.
Furthermore, I rather hear it from a person themselves on what they think instead of forcing me to read their link.
Thus, you are avoiding the FACT that evolution has mainly to do with GMO foods. It is based on gene mutation as I stated. You do not know enough to be able to argue against this devious method being used in our processed foods that evolution has brought to our food supply.
One of the difficult things is to find out what foods are GMO. I posted a list of the general ones.
Here's one on the brand names -- 6 GMO Loaded Brands You Should Avoid Buying.
I try to avoid them, but it's not always possible. Organic and natural foods are much better for one's health. I think GMO foods and evolution is why our life expectancies are going down. Furthermore, why don't you take credit for Covid-19? Isn't that evolution by natural selection?
6 GMO Loaded Brands You Should Avoid Buying
Do you want to know which companies to totally avoid because they use or support GMOs? Here are 6 huge conglomerates aiming to ruin your right to know.naturalsociety.com
Oh Bond. You poor, embarrassing little man. You say things like this and literally EVERYBODY knows you have no idea what you are talking about. They know you have no understanding of those topics. They know you say things like this, because you honestly think such transparent posturing gives you the "upper hand" somehow. It does not. It is bad acting and fools nobody.
Of course it is.
Corn isn't an excellent example of evolution. Otherwise, you would have explained and still haven't.
This is an example of how atheists and their scientists make general assumptions and attribute it to evolution.
Thus, I discussed how corn is a GMO and is used as bad. Isn't mutation the driver for evolution? In this case, it's gene mutation. Isn't that an example of corn as evolution haha?
Actually, it is a serious topic as evolution and GMO foods are really bad.
10 GMO Foods You Must Avoid Eating
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) were once promoted as the future of agriculture and the industry of food in general. With an increasing world population and the development of new technologies in the field of agroindustry, companies – especially the corporate giant Monsanto – presented...
I gave you a link showing the radical transformation of Corn over 9,000 years, too bad you didn't read it.
Here is the simple definition:
Corn as shown in the link, changed radically over 9,000 years, a classic case of guided evolution of a plant. That is a fact you are trying hard to ignore with your silly deflection to GMO.
I haven't mentioned GMO for an obvious that seems to elude you, which is why it is a Red Herring fallacy.
You are just taking natural selection which what God gave us to help us farm and grow crops. It's not easy to farm and raise livestock today. The best foods are organic or the way we used to grow crops. This was long before evolution and is part of creation science.
Furthermore, I rather hear it from a person themselves on what they think instead of forcing me to read their link.
Thus, you are avoiding the FACT that evolution has mainly to do with GMO foods. It is based on gene mutation as I stated. You do not know enough to be able to argue against this devious method being used in our processed foods that evolution has brought to our food supply.
One of the difficult things is to find out what foods are GMO. I posted a list of the general ones.
Here's one on the brand names -- 6 GMO Loaded Brands You Should Avoid Buying.
I try to avoid them, but it's not always possible. Organic and natural foods are much better for one's health. I think GMO foods and evolution is why our life expectancies are going down. Furthermore, why don't you take credit for Covid-19? Isn't that evolution by natural selection?
6 GMO Loaded Brands You Should Avoid Buying
Do you want to know which companies to totally avoid because they use or support GMOs? Here are 6 huge conglomerates aiming to ruin your right to know.
You are confused in what is Natural selection is and what is artificial selection, here is the difference from Wikipedia:
The Corn evolution I brought up is an excellent example of ARTIFICIAL selection. Dogs are another example of artificial evolution, where they didn't exist at all before 45.000 BCE. The PUG didn't exist before 500 BCE.
This is the fact you keep ducking because it doesn't support your creationist science at all.
Not going to run with your GMO red herring.
answersingenesis.org
)
I would say all we need for a discussion is a gap or an incongruity in the status quo theory. Stasis and lack of transitional fossils fit that bill. But I get your position, you believe natural selection explains everything. I don't.
Corn isn't an excellent example of evolution. Otherwise, you would have explained and still haven't.
This is an example of how atheists and their scientists make general assumptions and attribute it to evolution.
Thus, I discussed how corn is a GMO and is used as bad. Isn't mutation the driver for evolution? In this case, it's gene mutation. Isn't that an example of corn as evolution haha?
Actually, it is a serious topic as evolution and GMO foods are really bad.
10 GMO Foods You Must Avoid Eating
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) were once promoted as the future of agriculture and the industry of food in general. With an increasing world population and the development of new technologies in the field of agroindustry, companies – especially the corporate giant Monsanto – presented...
I gave you a link showing the radical transformation of Corn over 9,000 years, too bad you didn't read it.
Here is the simple definition:
Corn as shown in the link, changed radically over 9,000 years, a classic case of guided evolution of a plant. That is a fact you are trying hard to ignore with your silly deflection to GMO.
I haven't mentioned GMO for an obvious that seems to elude you, which is why it is a Red Herring fallacy.
You are just taking natural selection which what God gave us to help us farm and grow crops. It's not easy to farm and raise livestock today. The best foods are organic or the way we used to grow crops. This was long before evolution and is part of creation science.
Furthermore, I rather hear it from a person themselves on what they think instead of forcing me to read their link.
Thus, you are avoiding the FACT that evolution has mainly to do with GMO foods. It is based on gene mutation as I stated. You do not know enough to be able to argue against this devious method being used in our processed foods that evolution has brought to our food supply.
One of the difficult things is to find out what foods are GMO. I posted a list of the general ones.
Here's one on the brand names -- 6 GMO Loaded Brands You Should Avoid Buying.
I try to avoid them, but it's not always possible. Organic and natural foods are much better for one's health. I think GMO foods and evolution is why our life expectancies are going down. Furthermore, why don't you take credit for Covid-19? Isn't that evolution by natural selection?
6 GMO Loaded Brands You Should Avoid Buying
Do you want to know which companies to totally avoid because they use or support GMOs? Here are 6 huge conglomerates aiming to ruin your right to know.
You are confused in what is Natural selection is and what is artificial selection, here is the difference from Wikipedia:
The Corn evolution I brought up is an excellent example of ARTIFICIAL selection. Dogs are another example of artificial evolution, where they didn't exist at all before 45.000 BCE. The PUG didn't exist before 500 BCE.
This is the fact you keep ducking because it doesn't support your creationist science at all.
Not going to run with your GMO red herring.
I'm glad you are admitting it now. And you should take responsibility for GMO foods.
Natural selection was made by God. Artificial selection is evolution. So, you are right. Creation science does not support artificial selection. Here's why.
"Artificial selection occurs when humans breed for certain traits (such as speed, one of the traits selected for within the past 200 years, according to these researchers). In doing so, the breeder eliminates much of the variety within the genome (that’s created in the original kind). This results in low genetic diversity. To emphasize how low this diversity is, the article points out that nearly all male thoroughbreds (like those who raced at the Kentucky Derby just a little over a week ago) can trace their ancestry back to one stallion born in the year 1700.
And this low diversity is not a good thing! As National Geographic notes, “low genetic diversity leads to harmful genetic defects,” such as blindness or a sometimes-fatal condition known as myopathy. We see the same thing in dogs—low genetic diversity in the purebreds* results in all kinds of health problems."
Did Speedy Horses Evolve Only Recently?
The headline for a new study summarized by National Geographic declared, “Speedy horses evolved only recently, says landmark equine study.”
Puhleeze eat, eat, eat this kind of food today.
Nicer than saying eat feces and die.
Corn isn't an excellent example of evolution. Otherwise, you would have explained and still haven't.
This is an example of how atheists and their scientists make general assumptions and attribute it to evolution.
Thus, I discussed how corn is a GMO and is used as bad. Isn't mutation the driver for evolution? In this case, it's gene mutation. Isn't that an example of corn as evolution haha?
Actually, it is a serious topic as evolution and GMO foods are really bad.
10 GMO Foods You Must Avoid Eating
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) were once promoted as the future of agriculture and the industry of food in general. With an increasing world population and the development of new technologies in the field of agroindustry, companies – especially the corporate giant Monsanto – presented...
I gave you a link showing the radical transformation of Corn over 9,000 years, too bad you didn't read it.
Here is the simple definition:
Corn as shown in the link, changed radically over 9,000 years, a classic case of guided evolution of a plant. That is a fact you are trying hard to ignore with your silly deflection to GMO.
I haven't mentioned GMO for an obvious that seems to elude you, which is why it is a Red Herring fallacy.
You are just taking natural selection which what God gave us to help us farm and grow crops. It's not easy to farm and raise livestock today. The best foods are organic or the way we used to grow crops. This was long before evolution and is part of creation science.
Furthermore, I rather hear it from a person themselves on what they think instead of forcing me to read their link.
Thus, you are avoiding the FACT that evolution has mainly to do with GMO foods. It is based on gene mutation as I stated. You do not know enough to be able to argue against this devious method being used in our processed foods that evolution has brought to our food supply.
One of the difficult things is to find out what foods are GMO. I posted a list of the general ones.
Here's one on the brand names -- 6 GMO Loaded Brands You Should Avoid Buying.
I try to avoid them, but it's not always possible. Organic and natural foods are much better for one's health. I think GMO foods and evolution is why our life expectancies are going down. Furthermore, why don't you take credit for Covid-19? Isn't that evolution by natural selection?
6 GMO Loaded Brands You Should Avoid Buying
Do you want to know which companies to totally avoid because they use or support GMOs? Here are 6 huge conglomerates aiming to ruin your right to know.
You are confused in what is Natural selection is and what is artificial selection, here is the difference from Wikipedia:
The Corn evolution I brought up is an excellent example of ARTIFICIAL selection. Dogs are another example of artificial evolution, where they didn't exist at all before 45.000 BCE. The PUG didn't exist before 500 BCE.
This is the fact you keep ducking because it doesn't support your creationist science at all.
Not going to run with your GMO red herring.
I'm glad you are admitting it now. And you should take responsibility for GMO foods.
Natural selection was made by God. Artificial selection is evolution. So, you are right. Creation science does not support artificial selection. Here's why.
"Artificial selection occurs when humans breed for certain traits (such as speed, one of the traits selected for within the past 200 years, according to these researchers). In doing so, the breeder eliminates much of the variety within the genome (that’s created in the original kind). This results in low genetic diversity. To emphasize how low this diversity is, the article points out that nearly all male thoroughbreds (like those who raced at the Kentucky Derby just a little over a week ago) can trace their ancestry back to one stallion born in the year 1700.
And this low diversity is not a good thing! As National Geographic notes, “low genetic diversity leads to harmful genetic defects,” such as blindness or a sometimes-fatal condition known as myopathy. We see the same thing in dogs—low genetic diversity in the purebreds* results in all kinds of health problems."
Did Speedy Horses Evolve Only Recently?
The headline for a new study summarized by National Geographic declared, “Speedy horses evolved only recently, says landmark equine study.”
Puhleeze eat, eat, eat this kind of food today.
Nicer than saying eat feces and die.
I haven't admitted anything, it the obvious fact that BOTH natural and artificial evolution exist, I showed that evolution of animal species by humans made clear that it happens at a much faster pace. Creation Science doesn't allow that, which is why your contradictory evolution arguments are silly.
Your low genetic diversity argument is weak since the original "corn" plants exist as does the Wolf, the horse and so on.
What would you like clarified for you? I can point you toward some resources for discrete mathematics. Beyond that, get out the checkbook and take a class at your local university.
