I am not arguing against natural selection within a species. I am not even arguing against natural selection as the origin of species or abiogenesis as the basis for the creation of life. What I am telling you is that you are taking natural selection as the origin of species and abiogenesis on faith because there is not real evidence to support it.Yep, exactly why we know all extant species had a common ancestor. It has passed every test, over and over and over. You arent offering any real insight. The global scientific community -- that considers evolution to be true and which views abiogenesis as a foregone conclusion -- understands how to perform science.Theories that can be tested through experiment with the results repeated over and over again would be shown as true as any theory can or will be.
You cannot tell me why there are no transitional fossils (I can). You can not tell me the steps required for inanimate matter to make the leap to life (I can). So while I have a healthy dose of I don't have all the information needed to believe these are fact like you, you take these things on faith because you sure as hell don't know much about them.