Why I Am A Constitutional Textualist

[PoliticalChic]

The mindless bimbo is stuck on repeat.

The misconception of yours was clarified for you multiple times. Are you still confused? Or are you just a weak-minded idiot who can’t address the actual point?

Maybe a little bit of both, huh?

I asked you if your wrote "So Trump pushing for a 3rd term is unconstitutional."
You're afraid to answer.

I asked you if you vote Democrat, and you're embarrassed to answer.

I asked if you are a government school grad....more embarrassment.



You add nothing to the thread, you are one of those message-board freeloaders.


Get lost.

 

[PoliticalChic]

" Allegiance To E Pluribus Unum For Republic Of Etas Unis "

* Strumming Permeation Transferring Whether *

A characteristic of despotic democratism would be promoting populism for democracy as tyranny by the collective majority through a bureaucracy that is against independence of the individual .

A characteristic of us republicanism would be promoting a motto of e pluribus unum , which espouses independence of the individual , through equal protection of negative liberties among individuals , though as official motto it has been usurped .

Yearn acuity is no doubt aware of mediums , some of which are instruments termed strumpets .

. Where Were Non Violence Principles Applied ? .


* Expecting A Clear Point At Issue *

A pronoun is not a noun , such that referring to an object with the pronoun in a sentence , rather than stating or restating the noun , is incompletely described phraseology .

Rather than replying with " I explained the Constitution earlier " , restate or rephrase the explanation - a link just as well , to accentuate significant points at issue .

The nonsense of aimless ad-hominem responses is for guarded clowns .

I see you'd rather change the subject.

I don't.


If you'd care to respond to my criticism of your post, I'd be delighted.

Otherwise, I have no interest in your otherwise well-written posts.


You choose.

 

[PoliticalChic]

" Subjective Realism That Is Objective "

* Describing An Optional Perspective *

The principles of non violence and individualism can be applied to construct a civil law system that is ethically valid and can be deduced from first principles , and which does not require an appeal to authority , which is relevant to antiniomian ethos .

The concept of perspectivism relates that any perspective is not independent of other perspectives , and though perspectivism rejects epistomological absolutes , perspectivism does relate that every perspective is not equally valid .

" Subjective Realism That Is Objective "

Syncretic, like "kill a commie for Christ"

 

[PoliticalChic]

The mindless bimbo is stuck on repeat.

The misconception of yours was clarified for you multiple times. Are you still confused? Or are you just a weak-minded idiot who can’t address the actual point?

Maybe a little bit of both, huh?

"The misconception of yours "

Lying scum.....there was no misconception by me.

You simply had your head handed to you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

" Subjective Realism That Is Objective "

* Describing An Optional Perspective *

The principles of non violence and individualism can be applied to construct a civil law system that is ethically valid and can be deduced from first principles , and which does not require an appeal to authority , which is relevant to antiniomian ethos .

The concept of perspectivism relates that any perspective is not independent of other perspectives , and though perspectivism rejects epistomological absolutes , perspectivism does relate that every perspective is not equally valid .

"If there's no God - making ourselves the source of ethics for everybody, or declaring that nobody can be the source of ethics for anybody, and therefore morality is, again, purely subjective.

Abortion may be legal, and a woman’s right….but this doesn’t it is ethically right. The Greeks believed in a version of same in which they placed deformed babies on the hillside. The reason I use the Greek example of ugly children is not because we do it today, but because they had reason on their side.

Reason supports a lot of things, as for example, a very liberal position on abortion.

If there is no God, "Love your neighbor as yourself" is just a good idea. That's why it is written, incidentally, in Leviticus, "Love your neighbor as yourself, I am God." I, God, tell you to be decent to other people."
Dennis Prager

 

[alang1216]

The only way to use terms like "ethically".....which is defined as "in a way that relates to moral principles"...is the object and unchanging views of the Bible.

Fact.

Not fact. The morality of the Bible echoes the morality of the society that reads it, meaning it is not absolute.

I says thou shall not kill but orders the Israelites to kill every man, woman, and child in Jericho. The animals too. He also judges the Israelites as a people, not as individuals. Contrast this to the NT and it is obvious why the Gnostics believed these were two different beings.

 

[XponentialChaos]

I asked you if your wrote "So Trump pushing for a 3rd term is unconstitutional."
You're afraid to answer.

I asked you if you vote Democrat, and you're embarrassed to answer.

I asked if you are a government school grad....more embarrassment.



You add nothing to the thread, you are one of those message-board freeloaders.


Get lost.

Deflecting to talking about me, instead of the topic discussed, because you’re a weak-minded fool.

You continue to confirm this.

 

[XponentialChaos]

"The misconception of yours "

Lying scum.....there was no misconception by me.

You simply had your head handed to you.

It was clarified for you multiple times and yet you continue to bring this up instead of addressing the point.

Now why is that?

Are you still confused or are you too stupid to address the point? Little bit of both?

That’s what I thought you dumb bimbo.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Allusions To Idealism As Substantiation For Instantiation "

* Principles Of Non Violence And Individualism Are Based On Equitable Doctrine *

"If there's no God - making ourselves the source of ethics for everybody, or declaring that nobody can be the source of ethics for anybody, and therefore morality is, again, purely subjective.

For which reasons is equitable doctrine and principles of non violence and individualism , from first principles , being debased as purely subjective and not deductive ?

A rejection for epistomological absolutes does not mean that all perspectives are equally valid ,

There is obviously a goad that is being used to prod others into adopting its subjective perspective .

Issue is that the subjective perspective for such a goad is analogous with asserting that a possibility for a rite to life is equivalent with an entitlement for a rite to life .

Any thing that can be alienated is alienable and not inalienable , by logic ; consequently , a rite to life can be alienated , therefore a rite to life is not inalienable .

The literal meaning of an after life is genetic continuance , where by another - both figuratively and literally as oneself - through a sophisticated physical state , may have an opportunity to experience the sentience , sapience and introspection afforded as life , where failure to do so in perpetuity is ascribed the metaphors of final judgement or eternal damnation .

Which are reasons to believe otherwise that the success criteria of nature is to survive , the success criteria of nature does not appear to be changing ?

* Can Knot Enter Better Diction *

….but this doesn’t it is ethically right.

The correct terms could be ethically valid , or ethically correct , however ethically right is slang and a huge dumb faux pas of current lexicon and vernacular .

* Legal Positivism Versus Realism *

Reason supports a lot of things, as for example, a very liberal position on abortion.

Us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments and title 1 section 8 of us code define the constitutional basis for abortion .

* No Absolution To Institute Idealism Through Non Exclusive Claims *

If there is no God, "Love your neighbor as yourself" is just a good idea. That's why it is written, incidentally, in Leviticus, "Love your neighbor as yourself, I am God." I, God, tell you to be decent to other people."
Dennis Prager

 

[PoliticalChic]

Not fact. The morality of the Bible echoes the morality of the society that reads it, meaning it is not absolute.

I says thou shall not kill but orders the Israelites to kill every man, woman, and child in Jericho. The animals too. He also judges the Israelites as a people, not as individuals. Contrast this to the NT and it is obvious why the Gnostics believed these were two different beings.

What a stupid post.....seems to be your specialty.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Deflecting to talking about me, instead of the topic discussed, because you’re a weak-minded fool.

You continue to confirm this.

You are the only one who is "deflecting."

I asked you if your wrote "So Trump pushing for a 3rd term is unconstitutional."
You're afraid to answer.

I asked you if you vote Democrat, and you're embarrassed to answer.

I asked if you are a government school grad....more embarrassment.



You add nothing to the thread, you are one of those message-board freeloaders.


Get lost.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It was clarified for you multiple times and yet you continue to bring this up instead of addressing the point.

Now why is that?

Are you still confused or are you too stupid to address the point? Little bit of both?

That’s what I thought you dumb bimbo.

Did you write it?

 

[PoliticalChic]

" Allusions To Idealism As Substantiation For Instantiation "

* Principles Of Non Violence And Individualism Are Based On Equitable Doctrine *

For which reasons is equitable doctrine and principles of non violence and individualism , from first principles , being debased as purely subjective and not deductive ?

A rejection for epistomological absolutes does not mean that all perspectives are equally valid ,

There is obviously a goad that is being used to prod others into adopting its subjective perspective .

Issue is that the subjective perspective for such a goad is analogous with asserting that a possibility for a rite to life is equivalent with an entitlement for a rite to life .

Any thing that can be alienated is alienable and not inalienable , by logic ; consequently , a rite to life can be alienated , therefore a rite to life is not inalienable .

The literal meaning of an after life is genetic continuance , where by another - both figuratively and literally as oneself - through a sophisticated physical state , may have an opportunity to experience the sentience , sapience and introspection afforded as life , where failure to do so in perpetuity is ascribed the metaphors of final judgement or eternal damnation .

Which are reasons to believe otherwise that the success criteria of nature is to survive , the success criteria of nature does not appear to be changing ?

* Can Knot Enter Better Diction *

The correct terms could be ethically valid , or ethically correct , however ethically right is slang and a huge dumb faux pas of current lexicon and vernacular .

* Legal Positivism Versus Realism *

Us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments and title 1 section 8 of us code define the constitutional basis for abortion .

* No Absolution To Institute Idealism Through Non Exclusive Claims *

.....societies seems not to be able to fulfill the need sans the Judeo-Christian religions.

Now for the idea that the rational, the common sense method is better than religious morality. Can a human being be good without reference to God? As the saying goes, ‘Going to church doesn’t make you a good Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.’ Sure….there could be good pagans….or bad religious folks. While it is true that one can be moral and good and not religious, the idea does not work for all or even most.
Dennis Prager


Your view is that of the French Revolution, where the attempt was to replace religion with reason and science .....and resulted in 600,000 dead.

Science and reason can tell us what we can do.....not what we should do.


You must believe as " When Chou En Lai, the great Chinese Communist, was asked about the significance of the French Revolution, he supposedly replied, “It’s too early to tell.”...

Why is it taking you so long to learn?

 

[XponentialChaos]

Did you write it?

Are you still confused, bimbo?

 

[XponentialChaos]

You are the only one who is "deflecting."

I asked you if your wrote "So Trump pushing for a 3rd term is unconstitutional."
You're afraid to answer.

I asked you if you vote Democrat, and you're embarrassed to answer.

I asked if you are a government school grad....more embarrassment.



You add nothing to the thread, you are one of those message-board freeloaders.


Get lost.

Does any of that have anything to do with what was being discussed? No?

That’s called deflecting. Weak-minded idiots do it when they’re not smart enough address the topic being discussed.

Your bimbo tactics aren’t fooling anyone.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Are you still confused, bimbo?

You're not speaking to your family here.

Be civil, no matter how deeply embarrassed you are.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Does any of that have anything to do with what was being discussed? No?

That’s called deflecting. Weak-minded idiots do it when they’re not smart enough address the topic being discussed.

Your bimbo tactics aren’t fooling anyone.

Are you ready to answer?


I asked you if your wrote "So Trump pushing for a 3rd term is unconstitutional."
You're afraid to answer.

I asked you if you vote Democrat, and you're embarrassed to answer.

I asked if you are a government school grad....more embarrassment.

 

[XponentialChaos]

You're not speaking to your family here.

Be civil, no matter how deeply embarrassed you are.

Answer the question, bimbo.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Are you ready to answer?


I asked you if your wrote "So Trump pushing for a 3rd term is unconstitutional."
You're afraid to answer.

I asked you if you vote Democrat, and you're embarrassed to answer.

I asked if you are a government school grad....more embarrassment.

The dumb bimbo is stuck on repeat.

None of that has anything to do with the topic. That would be called deflecting.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The dumb bimbo is stuck on repeat.

None of that has anything to do with the topic. That would be called deflecting.

Time for you to leave.

But....whenever you return.....the same spanking will be in store.