Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 93,414
- 62,673
- 2,645
They give medals for being part of the uniquely American contingent of deniers? No, the world is laughing at you. All you have is each other.Who's not winning?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They give medals for being part of the uniquely American contingent of deniers? No, the world is laughing at you. All you have is each other.Who's not winning?
They give medals for being part of the uniquely American contingent of deniers? No, the world is laughing at you. All you have is each other.Who's not winning?
LOL"The 30% sea ice coverage has been growing for decades"The 30% sea ice coverage has been growing for decades... Only the 15% was in flux.. Your so full of shit its coming out of every orifice.From NASA. Do you morons think we measure sea ice with a ruler? We take pictures from space. You know, because people who actaully know something about this (not you fools) understand this is only understood by looking at all the sea ice, not just the sea ice from less than .1% of the Earth's surface.Where are asshats like FortFun getting these bogus graphs?
Except it hasn't. As anyone can go find for themselves. Hey, I think I saw a chart on it....
Yes, I already said that a bunch of idiots who know nothing about climate science thinking they have outsmarted the world's scientists is a uniquely American phenomenon. Thanks for posting all those links to support my point.They give medals for being part of the uniquely American contingent of deniers? No, the world is laughing at you. All you have is each other.Who's not winning?
Really s0n...............
But nobody is caring about climate change..............
Polls show most Americans believe in climate change, but give it low priority
Voters Aren't Willing to Pay to Fight Climate Change - Rasmussen Reports™
Importance of Issues - Rasmussen Reports™
Opinion | Voters don’t care that much about climate change. Democrats should talk about it anyway.
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blog...ters-dont-want-to-pay-to-fight-climate-change
Poll: Climate Change Ranks Low Among U.S. Concerns | RealClearPolitics!
Songify This - Winning - a Song by Charlie Sheen
Yes, I already said that a bunch of idiots who know nothing about climate science thinking they have outsmarted the world's scientists is a uniquely American phenomenon. Thanks for posting all those links to support my point.They give medals for being part of the uniquely American contingent of deniers? No, the world is laughing at you. All you have is each other.Who's not winning?
Really s0n...............
But nobody is caring about climate change..............
Polls show most Americans believe in climate change, but give it low priority
Voters Aren't Willing to Pay to Fight Climate Change - Rasmussen Reports™
Importance of Issues - Rasmussen Reports™
Opinion | Voters don’t care that much about climate change. Democrats should talk about it anyway.
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blog...ters-dont-want-to-pay-to-fight-climate-change
Poll: Climate Change Ranks Low Among U.S. Concerns | RealClearPolitics!
Songify This - Winning - a Song by Charlie Sheen
Yes Cletus, every slack jawed moron with free Wi-Fi at the trailer park denies climate change. We know this.
And, as everybody knows, this is a direct result of a campaign of misinformation fully funded by the fossil fuel industry. They focus their efforts in America, because they know americans are stupid. No, you fools with no education or experience in these fields are not outsmarting people that have dedicated their lives to them.
Yes, I already said that a bunch of idiots who know nothing about climate science thinking they have outsmarted the world's scientists is a uniquely American phenomenon. Thanks for posting all those links to support my point.They give medals for being part of the uniquely American contingent of deniers? No, the world is laughing at you. All you have is each other.Who's not winning?
Really s0n...............
But nobody is caring about climate change..............
Polls show most Americans believe in climate change, but give it low priority
Voters Aren't Willing to Pay to Fight Climate Change - Rasmussen Reports™
Importance of Issues - Rasmussen Reports™
Opinion | Voters don’t care that much about climate change. Democrats should talk about it anyway.
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blog...ters-dont-want-to-pay-to-fight-climate-change
Poll: Climate Change Ranks Low Among U.S. Concerns | RealClearPolitics!
Songify This - Winning - a Song by Charlie Sheen
Yes Cletus, every slack jawed moron with free Wi-Fi at the trailer park denies climate change. We know this.
And, as everybody knows, this is a direct result of a campaign of misinformation fully funded by the fossil fuel industry. They focus their efforts in America, because they know americans are stupid. No, you fools with no education or experience in these fields are not outsmarting people that have dedicated their lives to them.
You guys have all the science on your side, that's why you keep changing the data.
So did Michael Mann win his Nobel Prize for Mike's Nature Trick....or was it for Hiding the Decline?
Yes, I already said that a bunch of idiots who know nothing about climate science thinking they have outsmarted the world's scientists is a uniquely American phenomenon. Thanks for posting all those links to support my point.They give medals for being part of the uniquely American contingent of deniers? No, the world is laughing at you. All you have is each other.Who's not winning?
Really s0n...............
But nobody is caring about climate change..............
Polls show most Americans believe in climate change, but give it low priority
Voters Aren't Willing to Pay to Fight Climate Change - Rasmussen Reports™
Importance of Issues - Rasmussen Reports™
Opinion | Voters don’t care that much about climate change. Democrats should talk about it anyway.
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blog...ters-dont-want-to-pay-to-fight-climate-change
Poll: Climate Change Ranks Low Among U.S. Concerns | RealClearPolitics!
Songify This - Winning - a Song by Charlie Sheen
Yes Cletus, every slack jawed moron with free Wi-Fi at the trailer park denies climate change. We know this.
And, as everybody knows, this is a direct result of a campaign of misinformation fully funded by the fossil fuel industry. They focus their efforts in America, because they know americans are stupid. No, you fools with no education or experience in these fields are not outsmarting people that have dedicated their lives to them.
You guys have all the science on your side, that's why you keep changing the data.
So did Michael Mann win his Nobel Prize for Mike's Nature Trick....or was it for Hiding the Decline?
Okay, Cletus! Hee haw! Who needs all this fancy book learnin', when you outsmarted 'em all with a GED and a Busch Light!
You don't know? well, they have "fooled" the entire world, except for the Americans living within 10 miles of trailer park. So, duh, obviously, hey are now fudging the data to finally convince you and the rest. As hard as they try to lie, you geniuses are impervious to their efforts.Yes, I already said that a bunch of idiots who know nothing about climate science thinking they have outsmarted the world's scientists is a uniquely American phenomenon. Thanks for posting all those links to support my point.They give medals for being part of the uniquely American contingent of deniers? No, the world is laughing at you. All you have is each other.
Really s0n...............
But nobody is caring about climate change..............
Polls show most Americans believe in climate change, but give it low priority
Voters Aren't Willing to Pay to Fight Climate Change - Rasmussen Reports™
Importance of Issues - Rasmussen Reports™
Opinion | Voters don’t care that much about climate change. Democrats should talk about it anyway.
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blog...ters-dont-want-to-pay-to-fight-climate-change
Poll: Climate Change Ranks Low Among U.S. Concerns | RealClearPolitics!
Songify This - Winning - a Song by Charlie Sheen
Yes Cletus, every slack jawed moron with free Wi-Fi at the trailer park denies climate change. We know this.
And, as everybody knows, this is a direct result of a campaign of misinformation fully funded by the fossil fuel industry. They focus their efforts in America, because they know americans are stupid. No, you fools with no education or experience in these fields are not outsmarting people that have dedicated their lives to them.
You guys have all the science on your side, that's why you keep changing the data.
So did Michael Mann win his Nobel Prize for Mike's Nature Trick....or was it for Hiding the Decline?
Okay, Cletus! Hee haw! Who needs all this fancy book learnin', when you outsmarted 'em all with a GED and a Busch Light!
Yeah, them fancy book smart folks have all the answers....that's why they keep faking the data. DERP!
You don't know? well, they have "fooled" the entire world, except for the Americans living within 10 miles of trailer park. So, duh, obviously, hey are now fudging the data to finally convince you and the rest. As hard as they try to lie, you geniuses are impervious to their efforts.Yes, I already said that a bunch of idiots who know nothing about climate science thinking they have outsmarted the world's scientists is a uniquely American phenomenon. Thanks for posting all those links to support my point.Really s0n...............
But nobody is caring about climate change..............
Polls show most Americans believe in climate change, but give it low priority
Voters Aren't Willing to Pay to Fight Climate Change - Rasmussen Reports™
Importance of Issues - Rasmussen Reports™
Opinion | Voters don’t care that much about climate change. Democrats should talk about it anyway.
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blog...ters-dont-want-to-pay-to-fight-climate-change
Poll: Climate Change Ranks Low Among U.S. Concerns | RealClearPolitics!
Songify This - Winning - a Song by Charlie Sheen
Yes Cletus, every slack jawed moron with free Wi-Fi at the trailer park denies climate change. We know this.
And, as everybody knows, this is a direct result of a campaign of misinformation fully funded by the fossil fuel industry. They focus their efforts in America, because they know americans are stupid. No, you fools with no education or experience in these fields are not outsmarting people that have dedicated their lives to them.
You guys have all the science on your side, that's why you keep changing the data.
So did Michael Mann win his Nobel Prize for Mike's Nature Trick....or was it for Hiding the Decline?
Okay, Cletus! Hee haw! Who needs all this fancy book learnin', when you outsmarted 'em all with a GED and a Busch Light!
Yeah, them fancy book smart folks have all the answers....that's why they keep faking the data. DERP!
Arctic sea ice is the 8th lowest since 1978.HOLY SHIT.........40% increase in 5 years!!!
Top story at DRUDGE right now s0ns!!
https://realclimatescience.com/2017/09/40-sea-ice-ice-gain-over-the-past-five-years/
And more profound............ice gains in Greenland are off the charts!!!
Hmm, if only scientists could figure out a way to measure global sea ice and put it into a chart that any 4-year old could understand... I wonder if such a chart already exists?
Graphing is not yet functional but the downward view is now updating.. http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/NEWIMAGES/arctic.seaice.color.004.png
And sea ice levels are well within 2 STD... Normal cyclical variation...
Warmers never lie.
Warmers never lie.
Quite correct. None of the regular people on the rational side here has ever lied or supported people who lied. Our honesty and integrity is one of our defining characteristics.
In contrast, the deniers here are shockingly dishonest. If they're not lying openly themselves, they're kissing the asses of liars or actively running interference for liars.
Why? Because all the data says deniers are wrong about everything. Since being honest and admitting that is not permitted by the denier cult, lying on an epic level is the only option they see open to them. That's why the most of planet now initially assumes that anything that any denier says is a lie, unless independent evidence indicates otherwise. Experience has taught us how that's usually the case, as this thread demonstrates. All the deniers on this thread have been proudly dishonest in some way. It's how they earn brownie points in their liars' cult.
Now, here's one reason a season that started off melting fast fizzled. Ice export through the Fram Strait, a major source of Arctic ice loss, stopped dead in the summer.
Is that a new pattern? A new form a negative feedback, along with the increased snowfall that comes from more open water? Time will tell.
Poor deniers....all they can do is regurgitate talking points about nonscientists from denier blogs. How frustrating it must be to know you have not a shred of published science on your side.Warmers never lie.
Quite correct. None of the regular people on the rational side here has ever lied or supported people who lied. Our honesty and integrity is one of our defining characteristics.
In contrast, the deniers here are shockingly dishonest. If they're not lying openly themselves, they're kissing the asses of liars or actively running interference for liars.
Why? Because all the data says deniers are wrong about everything. Since being honest and admitting that is not permitted by the denier cult, lying on an epic level is the only option they see open to them. That's why the most of planet now initially assumes that anything that any denier says is a lie, unless independent evidence indicates otherwise. Experience has taught us how that's usually the case, as this thread demonstrates. All the deniers on this thread have been proudly dishonest in some way. It's how they earn brownie points in their liars' cult.
Now, here's one reason a season that started off melting fast fizzled. Ice export through the Fram Strait, a major source of Arctic ice loss, stopped dead in the summer.
Is that a new pattern? A new form a negative feedback, along with the increased snowfall that comes from more open water? Time will tell.
Quite correct. None of the regular people on the rational side here has ever lied or supported people who lied. Our honesty and integrity is one of our defining characteristics.
Absolutely.
So did Michael Mann win his Nobel Prize for Mike's Nature Trick....or was it for Hiding the Decline?
Poor deniers....all they can do is regurgitate talking points about nonscientists from denier blogs. How frustrating it must be to know you have not a shred of published science on your side.Warmers never lie.
Quite correct. None of the regular people on the rational side here has ever lied or supported people who lied. Our honesty and integrity is one of our defining characteristics.
In contrast, the deniers here are shockingly dishonest. If they're not lying openly themselves, they're kissing the asses of liars or actively running interference for liars.
Why? Because all the data says deniers are wrong about everything. Since being honest and admitting that is not permitted by the denier cult, lying on an epic level is the only option they see open to them. That's why the most of planet now initially assumes that anything that any denier says is a lie, unless independent evidence indicates otherwise. Experience has taught us how that's usually the case, as this thread demonstrates. All the deniers on this thread have been proudly dishonest in some way. It's how they earn brownie points in their liars' cult.
Now, here's one reason a season that started off melting fast fizzled. Ice export through the Fram Strait, a major source of Arctic ice loss, stopped dead in the summer.
Is that a new pattern? A new form a negative feedback, along with the increased snowfall that comes from more open water? Time will tell.
Quite correct. None of the regular people on the rational side here has ever lied or supported people who lied. Our honesty and integrity is one of our defining characteristics.
Absolutely.
So did Michael Mann win his Nobel Prize for Mike's Nature Trick....or was it for Hiding the Decline?
Wrong Michael Mann on my part. But my ccomments still stand. You have nothing. Flail awayPoor deniers....all they can do is regurgitate talking points about nonscientists from denier blogs. How frustrating it must be to know you have not a shred of published science on your side.Warmers never lie.
Quite correct. None of the regular people on the rational side here has ever lied or supported people who lied. Our honesty and integrity is one of our defining characteristics.
In contrast, the deniers here are shockingly dishonest. If they're not lying openly themselves, they're kissing the asses of liars or actively running interference for liars.
Why? Because all the data says deniers are wrong about everything. Since being honest and admitting that is not permitted by the denier cult, lying on an epic level is the only option they see open to them. That's why the most of planet now initially assumes that anything that any denier says is a lie, unless independent evidence indicates otherwise. Experience has taught us how that's usually the case, as this thread demonstrates. All the deniers on this thread have been proudly dishonest in some way. It's how they earn brownie points in their liars' cult.
Now, here's one reason a season that started off melting fast fizzled. Ice export through the Fram Strait, a major source of Arctic ice loss, stopped dead in the summer.
Is that a new pattern? A new form a negative feedback, along with the increased snowfall that comes from more open water? Time will tell.
Quite correct. None of the regular people on the rational side here has ever lied or supported people who lied. Our honesty and integrity is one of our defining characteristics.
Absolutely.
So did Michael Mann win his Nobel Prize for Mike's Nature Trick....or was it for Hiding the Decline?
all they can do is regurgitate talking points about nonscientists from denier blogs.
Michael Mann is a non-scientist?
How frustrating it must be to know you have not a shred of published science on your side.
Is that why Michael Mann won his Nobel Prize? Because of his published science?