Massie has a great idea for getting the names of miscreants out there from the Epstein files

[jacksonlamb]

Prove what?

Thank you.

 

[Delldude]

Thank you.

No problem...............

Epstein files: Why Epstein’s victims’ lawyer called Trump a 'Hero' in 2009

Trump provided specific details about why the ban happened. He told Edwards about an incident where Epstein had sexually harassed the teenage daughter of a Mar-a-Lago member (or poached young spa staff).

www.wionews.com

 

[jc456]

They were worried about retaliation not "legal consequences."

Isn’t that retaliation?

 

[jacksonlamb]

Isn’t that retaliation?

That's their concern not yours.

 

[Delldude]

They were worried about retaliation not "legal consequences."

“Most of these individuals, the victims, are very scared to say these names, because they could get sued. They’re going to get attacked, and nobody protected them the first time,” attorney Brad Edwards, who represents several survivors, said.

Epstein victims say they will compile their own 'client list,' demand accountability

Against the backdrop of the U.S. Capitol a number of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims demanded accountability for adults who enabled the deceased financier’s sexual abuse and said they would release their own “client list.” “We know the names,” said Lisa Phillips, an Epstein victim who hosts a podcast...

www.spokesman.com

 

[jacksonlamb]

Massie rules, MAGA drools.

 

[leftwinger]

I have read that Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.

He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.

Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.
He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.
Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

This is genius.

In the Yahoo News report, Massie states that he is willing to use the constitutional protections afforded to members of Congress to “publicly read a list of Epstein’s clients” that is being compiled by victims. This is a direct acknowledgment that he may release names on the House floor, where he cannot be prosecuted or sued for doing so.

Members of Congress are protected by the Speech and Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution.This means:

• They cannot be prosecuted for statements made during official legislative activity.
• They cannot be sued for defamation for what they say on the floor.
• They can introduce documents into the Congressional Record with legal immunity.

So if Massie chose to read names aloud, he would be shielded from legal consequences.

Still chirping this nonsense eh? YoursTruly has a new handle to swap in/out jacksonlamb


You don't fool anyone with that level of TDS. And this phoy messy massive stuff off the charts? Wow! No one sane gives a darn.//

 

[jacksonlamb]

Still chirping this nonsense eh? YoursTruly has a new handle to swap in/out jacksonlamb

You don't fool anyone with that level of TDS. And this phoy messy massive stuff off the charts? Wow! No one sane gives a darn.//

Massie rules, leftwinger drools, with Trump Derangement Syndrome.

 

[Delldude]

Massie rules, leftwinger drools, with Trump Derangement Syndrome.

The group, MAGA KY, raised $2 million between its launch in late June and the end of the month:

$1 million from Singer
$250,000 from hedge fund manager John Paulson
$750,000 from Preserve America PAC, a super PAC tied to Miriam Adelson that backed President Donald Trump last year

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/07/31/congress/maga-ky-super-pac-donors-00487931

https://www.axios.com/2025/06/26/trump-thomas-massie-maga-kentucky

 

[jacksonlamb]

Did you hear the Trump endorsed NC Senate Leader got beat in the primaries?

 

[jacksonlamb]

Did you hear the Trump endorsed NC Senate Leader got beat in the primaries?

Did you hear Mir a Lago rejected the MAGA candidate for its district.

 

[Natural Citizen]

The group, MAGA KY, raised $2 million between its launch in late June and the end of the month:

$1 million from Singer
$250,000 from hedge fund manager John Paulson
$750,000 from Preserve America PAC, a super PAC tied to Miriam Adelson that backed President Donald Trump last year

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/07/31/congress/maga-ky-super-pac-donors-00487931

https://www.axios.com/2025/06/26/trump-thomas-massie-maga-kentucky

The funny part about that ''PAC'' is that it's three billionaires from New York who established it and have no ties to Kentucky whatsoever.

Wait'll they get another load of what the actual folks in Massie's district think after the primary. Just like the last couple of times Trump and foreign intrests tried the same game against Massie and got smoked.

It'll be a hoot...

 

[YoursTruly]

Massie rules, leftwinger drools, with Trump Derangement Syndrome.

They think you and I are the same. It's their Trump Delusional Syndrome keeping from seeing things from a conservative perspective.

They're busy washing RINO nuts.

 

[Oddball]

The funny part about that ''PAC'' is that it's three billionaires from New York who established it and have no ties to Kentucky whatsoever.

Wait'll they get another load of what the actual folks in Massie's district think after the primary. Just like the last couple of times Trump and foreign intrests tried the same game against Massie and got smoked.

It'll be a hoot...

Didn't Trump already prove that big money really doesn't matter anymore?

 

[The Duke]

I have read that Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.

He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.

Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.
He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.
Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

This is genius.

In the Yahoo News report, Massie states that he is willing to use the constitutional protections afforded to members of Congress to “publicly read a list of Epstein’s clients” that is being compiled by victims. This is a direct acknowledgment that he may release names on the House floor, where he cannot be prosecuted or sued for doing so.

Members of Congress are protected by the Speech and Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution.This means:

• They cannot be prosecuted for statements made during official legislative activity.
• They cannot be sued for defamation for what they say on the floor.
• They can introduce documents into the Congressional Record with legal immunity.

So if Massie chose to read names aloud, he would be shielded from legal consequences.

Post a link up to the video of him doing so if/when it happens, then.
Tbh, I think he needs primaried.

 

[Crepitus]

I have read that Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.

He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.

Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.
He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.
Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

This is genius.

In the Yahoo News report, Massie states that he is willing to use the constitutional protections afforded to members of Congress to “publicly read a list of Epstein’s clients” that is being compiled by victims. This is a direct acknowledgment that he may release names on the House floor, where he cannot be prosecuted or sued for doing so.

Members of Congress are protected by the Speech and Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution.This means:

• They cannot be prosecuted for statements made during official legislative activity.
• They cannot be sued for defamation for what they say on the floor.
• They can introduce documents into the Congressional Record with legal immunity.

So if Massie chose to read names aloud, he would be shielded from legal consequences.

Wow, a bipartisan issue based on the responses from both the left and the right side of the foum.

Now, why can't the congresscritters get behind it?

 

[Natural Citizen]

Didn't Trump already prove that big money really doesn't matter anymore?

Theye do not know who theye are fighting.

Theye think that theye do.

But theye do not.

Here again I invoke theye in the historical context of themme.

Placing that aside, anyone who knows how and who has proven that they know how can raise big money. Raising big money is easy.

Too many seem to think that's the end all, be all. It's kind of humorous...

 

[excalibur]

Five months ago Thomas Massie said the following:
There are associates of Epstein who are guilty of raping children who have never been investigated before.
When the Epstein files are released, men guilty of raping children will go to prison.
The FBI is currently covering up at least 20 cases of child rape related to the Epstein case.
There were 1,000 Epstein victims and the FBI will not be able to cover up all the cases.
If the names of the guilty men aren't released, he or a Democrat would read them on the floor of the house.

Where are these 1,000 victims? Who are all these guilty men? Doesn't the public deserve to know?

Asking these questions will get you called a "protector of pedophiles." Massie will most likely block you. Trust me, I know.

Ro Khanna has repeated the same lines as Massie nightly on TV for about six months. Recently he was on the BBC talking about there is a cabal of men who are guilty of raping children that the FBI is protecting.

Either Massie and Khanna have seen proof to back up their claims, or they have not.

If they have seen proof, they are currently protecting child rapists by not disclosing what they know. If they haven't seen proof of what they have been claiming on TV for six months and it was just all assumptions, then it's one of the most despicable grifts of all time.​

 

[jacksonlamb]

Didn't Trump already prove that big money really doesn't matter anymore?

It did not in his district today. His party lost.

 

[gtopa1]

According to the women, yes.

The problem is are they telling the truth or are they just gold digging glorified hookers after a pay-out and fame. Frankly until they go to court I don't care for the whole bloody lot of them. IF anything is proved about under-age then jail the fuggers for life, but at this point I have no opinion one way or the other. I'll wait for the FACTS to be proved and please; in an UNBIASED court!!!

Greg