Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 89,193
- 67,124
- 3,565
Its harmful to the reputationI also don't know.
However, it seems that any association with Epstein is pretty ******* bad.
Do you agree?
But so far its only guilt by association
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its harmful to the reputationI also don't know.
However, it seems that any association with Epstein is pretty ******* bad.
Do you agree?
It’s a step by stepI’m not clear about what the libs are accusing them of
Is your short term memory shot? Too much weed???How is that manifested in the context of Epstein?
Whats going on is beginning to remind me of the French Revolution or Mao’s Cultural Revolution where everyone accused was guilty till proven innocentIt’s a step by step
Prominent people went to places of sexual atrocity. I do believe many were unaware but was that convenient, deliberate. Some yes some no. End of the day YOU choose to be there which is FACT. Once again Fact getting in the way of feelings, hopes and wishes.
Did they request the Beef Jerky, or the Pizza?The context is they visited Epstein properties. If they did nothing illegal then they cant beef about their name coming out because They Chose to visit
That’s long been true in the witch hunt on Trump. These people are not being accused of anything other than having travelled to his properties. If their name gets associated with where they visited, I believe that is just and properWhats going on is beginning to remind me of the French Revolution or Mao’s Cultural Revolution where everyone accused was guilty till proven innocent
Probably meant Weiner...Wexner?
no surprise
I doubt either of them do. They are just making political noise to keep their names in the news. DO you know something the rest of us don't?This ************ wants pedophiles protected!
That he had a very close with Dems, and Dems continued that close relations even after he was a registered sex offenderWhich means what exactly?
No, I think it depends on what that association is and when it was.I also don't know.
However, it seems that any association with Epstein is pretty ******* bad.
Do you agree?
Literally hundreds of gvt attorneys have been involved.All these men were involved with Epstein in the systematic rape and trafficking of underaged girls, but only two people have been charged. The attorney that decided that no one else is culpable needed to be subpoenaed.
No surprised, he was a huge fundraiser for Clinton back in 2016Lutnick admits he went to visit the Island.
He LIED earlier when he claimed he didn't.
Why did he LIE, and why did trump hire him to a Cabinet Position?
View attachment 1217603View attachment 1217604
View attachment 1217605View attachment 1217606
- Congressmen Khanna and Massie released the names of six men involved in the Epstein scandal
- 70 - 80% of the Epstein files are still redacted
- The files they reviewed were scrubbed by the FBI back in March, so these names were known and never released by this administration
- Lutnick comes up again
What other business was that pedophile involved in other than child trafficking?No, I think it depends on what that association is and when it was.
To suggest someone is guilty or even a bad person because they knew someone 40 years ago, and 20 years later that person turned out to be a criminal is rather silly
Not closer than he 2as with Trump, who you and the rest of the Republican MAGATs worship.That he had a very close with Dems, and Dems continued that close relations even after he was a registered sex offender
Are you high?Not closer than he 2as with Trump, who you and the rest of the Republican MAGATs worship.
Not a good l7ck. Like, st all.