jacksonlamb
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2026
- 431
- 206
- 143
- Thread starter
- #101
Its the law.That crap about hiding behind their speech and debate clause regarding this issue I think won't pass muster.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its the law.That crap about hiding behind their speech and debate clause regarding this issue I think won't pass muster.
No one of import is moving on from Epstein at all. Yes, Massie needs to name names.So why hasn't he named the names like he already said he was going to do? People are starting to move on from Epsteingate so I guess Massie needs to milk it before it's no longer relevant.
That's the point. Accused, to what extent? Hearsay? You're ok with unproven allegations possibly destroying someones life?The law said ONLY protect victims not people accused.
That's speculation on your part........nothing more.They protected people accused… that is against the law that was passed and signed by Trump.
So was Roe vs WadeIts the law.
Big money being pumped in from out of state.He’s in a safe district that he won by a landslide. Your answer doesn’t make sense.
Don't and won't matter.Big money being pumped in from out of state.
Count your chickens dude.Don't and won't matter.
I have all of mine and the eggs, and some of yours.Count your chickens dude.
The law was passed. They have to release all the files. They are breaking the law. It’s too late. It has to be followed.That's the point. Accused, to what extent? Hearsay? You're ok with unproven allegations possibly destroying someones life?
That's speculation on your part........nothing more.
The victims claimed to have their own list but wouldn't release it due to possible legal consequences against them if they were wrong.The law was passed. They have to release all the files. They are breaking the law. It’s too late. It has to be followed.
And they're all scrambled.I have all of mine and the eggs, and some of yours.
in english?Yes, everyone read them so you can understand with jc is messed up in the head: the boy don't think.
CrusaderFrank doesn't care, release the names, I stand with Frank, Massie, fking release the names. The fk with their lives, fk that, if they knew Epstein they are automatically guilty, ask Frank!!!!The victims claimed to have their own list but wouldn't release it due to possible legal consequences against them if they were wrong.
Congress is no exception. Law or no law, I have doubts on it being constitutional.
They are seriously like a lynch mob carrying torches and a rope. 'He musta raped that white girl, that's what people are sayin'That's the point. Accused, to what extent? Hearsay? You're ok with unproven allegations possibly destroying someones life?
That's speculation on your part........nothing more.
So was Roe vs Wade
The funny thing is they're foaming at the mouth here in search of anything on Trump and Trump was one of the few to assist with Epstein and Maxwell's prosecution.They are seriously like a lynch mob carrying torches and a rope. 'He musta raped that white girl, that's what people are sayin'
They were worried about retaliation not "legal consequences."The victims claimed to have their own list but wouldn't release it due to possible legal consequences against them if they were wrong.
Congress is no exception. Law or no law, I have doubts on it being constitutional.
And they taste good. My brother likes it with tabasco sauce.And they're all scrambled.
BothThey were worried about retaliation not "legal consequences."
Prove that. You can't.The funny thing is they're foaming at the mouth here in search of anything on Trump and Trump was one of the few to assist with Epstein and Maxwell's prosecution.
'Just has to be some dirt on Trump'
And beyond that, a group of Vic's were asked on NBC, I think, if Trump ever did anything to them(not sure of the exact wording) and they all said no.
You don't the differences.Both
Prove what?Prove that. You can't.