MarcATL
Diamond Member
- Aug 12, 2009
- 47,732
- 26,320
- 2,605
What were Trump and MAGA suggesting was the wrongdoing in the Epstein files during his campaign?So far we’ve seen a lot of smoke but no fire
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What were Trump and MAGA suggesting was the wrongdoing in the Epstein files during his campaign?So far we’ve seen a lot of smoke but no fire
Yeah, weird how the fact a dem, currently still in Congress, was actively, in real time getting text messages from him, in a hearing to try and "get trump" ----Funny how nobody wants to talk about Stacey Plaskett's involvement.
We didn't know, now we know, Epstein had a very close relationship with a lot of Dems, and even after he was a convicted sex offender.What were Trump and MAGA suggesting was the wrongdoing in the Epstein files during his campaign?
Thats your best answer?What were Trump and MAGA suggesting was the wrongdoing in the Epstein files during his campaign?
The context is they visited Epstein properties. If they did nothing illegal then they cant beef about their name coming out because They Chose to visitNames? Whoop de freaking do.
Got CONTEXT?
![]()
Why won't you answer the question?Thats your best answer?
Go Fish?
So what are you suggesting?We didn't know, now we know, Epstein had a very close relationship with a lot of Dems, and even after he was a convicted sex offender.
I see.Accountability for what? We haven't seen any evidence that anyone, other than Epstein, was diddling underage girls.
I am not suggesting...it's clearly in the Epstein files:So what are you suggesting?
Because I dont know the answerWhy won't you answer the question?
If my name is in the paper because I attended a ball game where there was an explosion, it does not mean I’m the bomber . It means I was there. Same thing with all this name hocus pocus.Because I dont know the answer
But the original question (that you dodged) was to libs like you
Exactly what are the six accused of doing?
Which means what exactly?I am not suggesting...it's clearly in the Epstein files:
Epstein had a very close relationship with a lot of Dems, and even after he was a convicted sex offender.
I also don't know.Because I dont know the answer
But the original question (that you dodged) was to libs like you
Exactly what are the six accused of doing?
Agreed. A true weirdo that was best buds with Epstein.Wexner?
no surprise
Democrats have no standards.Which means what exactly?
Which means Dems are full of shit with their phony outrage over “the Epstein files”. They are desperate to link Trump to him.Which means what exactly?
How is that manifested in the context of Epstein?Democrats have no standards.
This ************ wants pedophiles protected!
I’m not clear about what the libs are accusing them ofIf my name is in the paper because I attended a ball game where there was an explosion, it does not mean I’m the bomber . It means I was there. Same thing with all this name hocus pocus.
This wailing about “not his name” reeks of guilt. Sorry if you did not know he was a perv but you did in FACT attend one of his properties.
- Congressmen Khanna and Massie released the names of six men involved in the Epstein scandal
- 70 - 80% of the Epstein files are still redacted
- The files they reviewed were scrubbed by the FBI back in March, so these names were known and never released by this administration
- Lutnick comes up again