The problem is the bullshit Pablum that you clowns make up for a definition. You clowns wouldn't ever even recognize a fact if it was printed on your eyeball. You are a joke. That's all then becomes of anything you say.
Mass school shootings since 1966, 56years? 13….
- Thread starter 2aguy
- Start date
Here's a fact, anyone who supported or were part of the attempted overthrow of our country and democracy on Jan 6 and anyone who supported the leader of that inserection should have their guns taken away forever. If they don't give them up, take them by force, any level of violence is acceptable. The government agency to take this action should be armed to the teeth and not afraid to pull the trigger on these traitors.
How stupid as a country could we be, allowing these traitors to keep their guns. You know damn well that when Trump asks them to kill during the next attempt, they will.
Here's a facr for you. Buffoons wearing hats with horns were not a threat to overthrow the government.
Don't be an accomplice to goofy Democrat / leftist conspiracy theories.
Now, when Trump asks you to kill for him, will you.
Baffons wearing hats is every single one of you so, all of you put together are incapable to destroy our democracy. You and your party are this country's biggest threat and enemy, and there is nothing that comes close in the world to your threat. You are a traitor to this country. You're pond scum to the last man.
The funny part is this q anoner is talking about Democratic conspiracy's. Now that's a hoot!
In reality, the list grows. In 2aguy's world, wrong colour of pants, wrong gun type, wrong time of day, too many people, not enough ducked, wrong building etc.. In reality, the list grows.
A mass shooting is done by someone out to kill as many people as possible.
In reality, the list keeps growing
If 10 guys went on the rampage and one of them shot 4 people, did they drive the wrong colour of car? In reality, the list keeps growing.
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 113,045
- 53,542
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #112
The FBI definition.......the one that counts....
US mass shootings, 1982–2022: Data from Mother Jones’ investigation
Dating back to at least 2005, the FBI and leading criminologists essentially defined a mass shooting as a single attack in a public place in which four or more victims were killed. We adopted that baseline for fatalities when we gathered data in 2012 on three decades worth of cases.
-------
- Here is a description of the criteria we use:
- The perpetrator took the lives of at least four people. A 2008 FBI report identifies an individual as a mass murderer—versus a spree killer or a serial killer—if he kills four or more people in a single incident (not including himself), typically in a single location. (*In 2013, the US government’s fatality baseline was revised down to three; our database reflects this change beginning from Jan. 2013, as detailed above.)
- The killings were carried out by a lone shooter. (Except in the case of the Columbine massacre and the Westside Middle School killings, which involved two shooters.)
- The shootings occurred in a public place. (Except in the case of a party on private property in Crandon, Wisconsin, and another in Seattle, where crowds of strangers had gathered, essentially constituting a public crowd.)
- Crimes primarily related to gang activity or armed robbery are not included, nor are mass killings that took place in private homes (often stemming from domestic violence).
- Perpetrators who died or were wounded during the attack are not included in the victim tallies.
- We included a handful of cases also known as “spree killings“—cases in which the killings occurred in more than one location, but still over a short period of time, that otherwise fit the above criteria.
We exclude shootings stemming from more conventionally motivated crimes such as armed robbery or gang violence.
(Or in which the perpetrators have not been identified.) Other news outlets and researchers have since published larger tallies that include a wide range of gun crimes in which four or more people have been either wounded or killed. While those larger datasets of multiple-victim shootings are useful for studying the broader problem of gun violence, our investigation provides an in-depth look at a distinct phenomenon—from the firearms used and mental health factors to the growing copycat problem. Tracking mass shootings is complex; we believe ours is the most useful approach for studying this specific phenomenon.
---------
The actual number of mass shootings from Mother Jones......
Here you go...the number of mass public shootings according to Mother Jones...rabid, anti gun, left wing news source.....not the NRA...
The list below comes from the old definition of 4 killed to make a shooting a mass shooting...if you now go to the link there are more than listed below...but that is because Mother Jones changed the list from the time I first posted it...and changed to obama's new standard of only 3 dead to make a mass shooting...
US Mass Shootings, 1982-2015: Data From Mother Jones' Investigation
2021...6
2020....2
2019....10
2018... 12
2017: 11 ( 5 according to the old standard)
2016....6
2015....4 ( obama's new standard....7)
2014....2 (4)
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 113,045
- 53,542
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #113
No matter how big the list....it will never catch up to the 15 million people you Europeans allowed the German socialists to murder in the 6 years between 1939-1945.....
Americans had to stop that one too.....with our guns.....
You see a mass shooter in every incident, don't you?
You lost the war in 1776 because France came in to save your arses.
You are losing the arguement so you have to try to knock me down in this imaginary status hierarchy. So you feel I'm above you so you have to try and insult me with a war or the monarchy etc.. It's a silly game and it makes you look stupid because your knowledge of history is piss poor.
The Vietnamese kicked your arses.
If it involves shooting and the masses, then there's a clue in the wording. The colour of their underpants, or whether they shaved or not doesn't change the rules of the English language.
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 113,045
- 53,542
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #117
You mean your tiny, insignificant island lost that war...to a bunch of colonists...
No.....we defeated the North Vietnamese and they stayed across the border....the democrat party then refused to fulfill our treaty obligations when the North reinvaded the south....once again, leftists lost a war.
Yes, the world is made up of masses of people. Now you get to explain how it is that when someone is shot on a playground at one in the morning, you're on board with those hysterical types who stupidly call it a mass shooting. Or, gun goes off by accident in a college dorm at night, and you're on board with the same types who stupidly call it a school shooting.
No, America's forefathers were getting their arses kicked, the French came galloping in to help. America did not win independence, the French won it for them. Sorry to piss on your parade.
How do I know? I went to Paris and there was a statue of a French general. The inscription mentioned American independence. I never really did history because I'm not a bell end like you and others that try to glorify from the past when you had **** all to do with it. So after a bit of research, America's colonies were getting their arses well spanked, then the French joined late on the colony's side.
That's probably where you got your shit rhetoric about the two great wars were America turned up late, then claim they won it.
You're an embarrassment.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
They tried making an excuse for why Baron can't serve... But none exist- Started by IM2
- Replies: 0
-
-
Are Christians Required to Pledge Loyalty to Bibi Netanyahu? Carrie Prejean Boller & Tucker Respond.- Started by Andrew_Jackson_FTW
- Replies: 4
-
