> The company hired to do the audit is not in the business of auditing elections.
LOL. False. You can watch them do it via live stream.
Wrong. They don't even advertise election audits on their own website. They promote themselves as a cyber-security firm. They have no experience in auditing elections, handling ballots in accordance within state and federal laws, validating signatures, or counting ballots. That's not what they do.
cyberninjas.com
>That company is not credited to audit an election.
I think the word you are looking for is accredited, but since you can't spell it, you certainly can't explain it without googling something. They obviously have the accreditation required by the Arizona Senate.
No, they don't. Only these companies are and Cyber Ninjas is not on the list...
The following voting system test laboratories have been accredited by EAC to test voting systems.
www.eac.gov
>That company went into this process biased, already believing there was fraud.
Now you are a mind reader? I've read they are impartial.
Who needs to read minds when these idiots have Twitter?
>They won't reveal who's financing the bulk of this operation.
Obviously the taxpayers, duh.
No, not so obvious. Arizona tax payers paid only $150,000 out of millions. So who's funding the rest? They refuse to say.
>It was discovered one of their ballot reviewers is a "stop the steal" Trumplican who lost his election in November and whose own name is on the ballots.
Hahahahahahahaha. That's hilarious!
LOL
Which of those women are reviewing ballots with their own name on them because they ran in the 2020 election? That's the problem. What was their job? You can't say from that photo. It certainly doesn't look like they're counting ballots. And bias isn't the issue. That's why veracious recounts insist on having both major parties reviewing every ballot. This audit does not enforce that.