Maricopa County's Audit doesn't disappoint....

[Faun]

There was never any intentions from the get go, of the Arizona Senate and Trumper bought audit... to be a legitimate audit....

It's for propaganda use only.

They would have RUN a legitimate audit, following all State election rules and law, if they wanted a legitimate/legal audit....they chose Cyber Ninjas, instead of a certified election auditing firm, with the State overseeing the rules are followed and ballots kept secure...

Y'all Trumpers, are being played....by your puppet master.

(Rumor is, that's how you like it)

Rumor is the DOJ might interfere to stop the audit. There is not a better way of them admitting there was massive fraud.

Is the audit legal, or does it break a legal statute?


Arizona just needs to follow the law....the audit can continue, but the state, under the rule of law, has to have custody of the ballots is my understanding...?

What is your understanding for stopping the audit if there was no fraud.

The audit does not have to be stopped, they simply just need to follow the law while performing the audit.

At this point the ballots have been spoiled. These partisan assholes have had possession of them for weeks. There can be no trust as to whether they have been altered or even destroyed now

Exactly right. Chain of custody was lost.

 

[Faun]

With only 9 days left before the estimated completion of the audit, which was reported to be on schedule as recently as April 28, it is unclear how many signatures have already been compared and validated. The settlement does not stop Cyber Ninjas from disclosing their current findings regarding matching signatures on the ballots.

BREAKING: Democrats Settle Lawsuit Over Maricopa Audit With 9 Days To Go, Experts Will Cease Signature Matching

After a lengthy lawsuit that saw the Democrats achieve few victories in their goal of stopping the audit of the

nationalfile.com

Why would they stop signature verification unless it was not done properly the first time? More guilt showing everyday.

What are the qualifications of the folks checking signatures?

 

[Lastamender]

I don't follow.

What have you been told to be outraged about?

I find it hilarious that somebody whose name is on the ballot is seen "auditing" them and the reporter who tweeted the photo was immediate expelled from the location. Based on the Senate's expressed purpose for the audit I'm finding the process comical.

About what I've been told to be outraged about, the closest I've come to that is my curiousity about who is paying for all of this? Our Senate only budgeted $150,000 which is only a drop in the bucket to what it is costing. Since these people are handling our voting ballots and our county's voting machines, I believe we have a right to know.

They're no longer even hiding the fact that this is a farce.

The same happened with the 2020 election Big Tech made no bones about the obvious guilt with censorship. The election was the farce.

 

[colfax_m]

Why would they stop signature verification unless it was not done properly the first time?

The audit never was comparing signatures.

 

[Lastamender]

There was never any intentions from the get go, of the Arizona Senate and Trumper bought audit... to be a legitimate audit....

It's for propaganda use only.

They would have RUN a legitimate audit, following all State election rules and law, if they wanted a legitimate/legal audit....they chose Cyber Ninjas, instead of a certified election auditing firm, with the State overseeing the rules are followed and ballots kept secure...

Y'all Trumpers, are being played....by your puppet master.

(Rumor is, that's how you like it)

Rumor is the DOJ might interfere to stop the audit. There is not a better way of them admitting there was massive fraud.

Is the audit legal, or does it break a legal statute?


Arizona just needs to follow the law....the audit can continue, but the state, under the rule of law, has to have custody of the ballots is my understanding...?

What is your understanding for stopping the audit if there was no fraud.

The audit does not have to be stopped, they simply just need to follow the law while performing the audit.

At this point the ballots have been spoiled. These partisan assholes have had possession of them for weeks. There can be no trust as to whether they have been altered or even destroyed now

Exactly right. Chain of custody was lost.

Then you better get rid of all those votes in GA. that have no chain of custody. That would give GA to Trump. Let's do that.

 

[Orangecat]

 

[Faun]

> The company hired to do the audit is not in the business of auditing elections.

LOL. False. You can watch them do it via live stream.

Wrong. They don't even advertise election audits on their own website. They promote themselves as a cyber-security firm. They have no experience in auditing elections, handling ballots in accordance within state and federal laws, validating signatures, or counting ballots. That's not what they do.

Cyber Ninjas

cyberninjas.com

>That company is not credited to audit an election.

I think the word you are looking for is accredited, but since you can't spell it, you certainly can't explain it without googling something. They obviously have the accreditation required by the Arizona Senate.

No, they don't. Only these companies are and Cyber Ninjas is not on the list...

Accredited Laboratories | U.S. Election Assistance Commission

The following voting system test laboratories have been accredited by EAC to test voting systems.

www.eac.gov

>That company went into this process biased, already believing there was fraud.

Now you are a mind reader? I've read they are impartial.

Who needs to read minds when these idiots have Twitter?

https://www.azmirror.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/logan-twitter-fraud-real-rt.png

>They won't reveal who's financing the bulk of this operation.

Obviously the taxpayers, duh.

No, not so obvious. Arizona tax payers paid only $150,000 out of millions. So who's funding the rest? They refuse to say.

>It was discovered one of their ballot reviewers is a "stop the steal" Trumplican who lost his election in November and whose own name is on the ballots.

Hahahahahahahaha. That's hilarious!

LOL

Which of those women are reviewing ballots with their own name on them because they ran in the 2020 election? That's the problem. What was their job? You can't say from that photo. It certainly doesn't look like they're counting ballots. And bias isn't the issue. That's why veracious recounts insist on having both major parties reviewing every ballot. This audit does not enforce that.

both major parties reviewing every ballot.

None of that was done Nov. 3rd and days afterwards and you did not say a thing.

Liar.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/11/05/arizona-election-protest-votes/

Speaking briefly to The Post, Harrison falsely claimed there are no Republicans in the elections center processing ballots. Pairs of people from opposite political parties worked jointly to examine ballots Wednesday night.​

That you have to lie shows how fragile your position is.

 

[Lastamender]

Why would they stop signature verification unless it was not done properly the first time?

The audit never was comparing signatures.

Then why did Democrats stop it from happening?

 

[Faun]

There was never any intentions from the get go, of the Arizona Senate and Trumper bought audit... to be a legitimate audit....

It's for propaganda use only.

They would have RUN a legitimate audit, following all State election rules and law, if they wanted a legitimate/legal audit....they chose Cyber Ninjas, instead of a certified election auditing firm, with the State overseeing the rules are followed and ballots kept secure...

Y'all Trumpers, are being played....by your puppet master.

(Rumor is, that's how you like it)

Rumor is the DOJ might interfere to stop the audit. There is not a better way of them admitting there was massive fraud.

Is the audit legal, or does it break a legal statute?


Arizona just needs to follow the law....the audit can continue, but the state, under the rule of law, has to have custody of the ballots is my understanding...?

What is your understanding for stopping the audit if there was no fraud.

The audit does not have to be stopped, they simply just need to follow the law while performing the audit.

At this point the ballots have been spoiled. These partisan assholes have had possession of them for weeks. There can be no trust as to whether they have been altered or even destroyed now

Exactly right. Chain of custody was lost.

Then you better get rid of all those votes in GA. that have no chain of custody. That would give GA to Trump. Let's do that.

LOL

What on Earth leads you to believe Georgia lost their chain of custody of their ballots?

 

[Lastamender]

> The company hired to do the audit is not in the business of auditing elections.

LOL. False. You can watch them do it via live stream.

Wrong. They don't even advertise election audits on their own website. They promote themselves as a cyber-security firm. They have no experience in auditing elections, handling ballots in accordance within state and federal laws, validating signatures, or counting ballots. That's not what they do.

Cyber Ninjas

cyberninjas.com

>That company is not credited to audit an election.

I think the word you are looking for is accredited, but since you can't spell it, you certainly can't explain it without googling something. They obviously have the accreditation required by the Arizona Senate.

No, they don't. Only these companies are and Cyber Ninjas is not on the list...

Accredited Laboratories | U.S. Election Assistance Commission

The following voting system test laboratories have been accredited by EAC to test voting systems.

www.eac.gov

>That company went into this process biased, already believing there was fraud.

Now you are a mind reader? I've read they are impartial.

Who needs to read minds when these idiots have Twitter?

https://www.azmirror.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/logan-twitter-fraud-real-rt.png

>They won't reveal who's financing the bulk of this operation.

Obviously the taxpayers, duh.

No, not so obvious. Arizona tax payers paid only $150,000 out of millions. So who's funding the rest? They refuse to say.

>It was discovered one of their ballot reviewers is a "stop the steal" Trumplican who lost his election in November and whose own name is on the ballots.

Hahahahahahahaha. That's hilarious!

LOL

Which of those women are reviewing ballots with their own name on them because they ran in the 2020 election? That's the problem. What was their job? You can't say from that photo. It certainly doesn't look like they're counting ballots. And bias isn't the issue. That's why veracious recounts insist on having both major parties reviewing every ballot. This audit does not enforce that.

both major parties reviewing every ballot.

None of that was done Nov. 3rd and days afterwards and you did not say a thing.

Liar.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/11/05/arizona-election-protest-votes/

​

Speaking briefly to The Post, Harrison falsely claimed there are no Republicans in the elections center processing ballots. Pairs of people from opposite political parties worked jointly to examine ballots Wednesday night.​

That you have to lie shows how fragile your position is.

The WP calls no one a liar. They have 0 credibility.

 

[Lastamender]

There was never any intentions from the get go, of the Arizona Senate and Trumper bought audit... to be a legitimate audit....

It's for propaganda use only.

They would have RUN a legitimate audit, following all State election rules and law, if they wanted a legitimate/legal audit....they chose Cyber Ninjas, instead of a certified election auditing firm, with the State overseeing the rules are followed and ballots kept secure...

Y'all Trumpers, are being played....by your puppet master.

(Rumor is, that's how you like it)

Rumor is the DOJ might interfere to stop the audit. There is not a better way of them admitting there was massive fraud.

Is the audit legal, or does it break a legal statute?


Arizona just needs to follow the law....the audit can continue, but the state, under the rule of law, has to have custody of the ballots is my understanding...?

What is your understanding for stopping the audit if there was no fraud.

The audit does not have to be stopped, they simply just need to follow the law while performing the audit.

At this point the ballots have been spoiled. These partisan assholes have had possession of them for weeks. There can be no trust as to whether they have been altered or even destroyed now

Exactly right. Chain of custody was lost.

Then you better get rid of all those votes in GA. that have no chain of custody. That would give GA to Trump. Let's do that.

LOL

What on Earth leads you to believe Georgia lost their chain of custody of their ballots?

From a real journalist.

REPORT: Chain of custody proof not produced for Fulton County, GA absentee ballots | Sharyl Attkisson

Almost six months after the 2020 Presidential election, Fulton County, Georgia officials have failed to fulfill a public records request for chain of custody documents for absentee mail in ballots dropped in drop boxes. That’s according to Georgia Star News. […]

sharylattkisson.com

Time to give GA. to Trump?

 

[colfax_m]

Then why did Democrats stop it from happening?

Because the law stipulates that the signature matching is to be done by trained government officials.

 

[Faun]

> The company hired to do the audit is not in the business of auditing elections.

LOL. False. You can watch them do it via live stream.

Wrong. They don't even advertise election audits on their own website. They promote themselves as a cyber-security firm. They have no experience in auditing elections, handling ballots in accordance within state and federal laws, validating signatures, or counting ballots. That's not what they do.

Cyber Ninjas

cyberninjas.com

>That company is not credited to audit an election.

I think the word you are looking for is accredited, but since you can't spell it, you certainly can't explain it without googling something. They obviously have the accreditation required by the Arizona Senate.

No, they don't. Only these companies are and Cyber Ninjas is not on the list...

Accredited Laboratories | U.S. Election Assistance Commission

The following voting system test laboratories have been accredited by EAC to test voting systems.

www.eac.gov

>That company went into this process biased, already believing there was fraud.

Now you are a mind reader? I've read they are impartial.

Who needs to read minds when these idiots have Twitter?

https://www.azmirror.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/logan-twitter-fraud-real-rt.png

>They won't reveal who's financing the bulk of this operation.

Obviously the taxpayers, duh.

No, not so obvious. Arizona tax payers paid only $150,000 out of millions. So who's funding the rest? They refuse to say.

>It was discovered one of their ballot reviewers is a "stop the steal" Trumplican who lost his election in November and whose own name is on the ballots.

Hahahahahahahaha. That's hilarious!

LOL

Which of those women are reviewing ballots with their own name on them because they ran in the 2020 election? That's the problem. What was their job? You can't say from that photo. It certainly doesn't look like they're counting ballots. And bias isn't the issue. That's why veracious recounts insist on having both major parties reviewing every ballot. This audit does not enforce that.

both major parties reviewing every ballot.

None of that was done Nov. 3rd and days afterwards and you did not say a thing.

Liar.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/11/05/arizona-election-protest-votes/

​

Speaking briefly to The Post, Harrison falsely claimed there are no Republicans in the elections center processing ballots. Pairs of people from opposite political parties worked jointly to examine ballots Wednesday night.​

That you have to lie shows how fragile your position is.

The WP calls no one a liar. They have 0 credibility.

LOL

Your concession is duly noted.

 

[Lastamender]

Then why did Democrats stop it from happening?

Because the law stipulates that the signature matching is to be done by trained government officials.

Is that why Nevada had a machine do it? Do you know if a machine was used in Arizona?

 

[Lastamender]

> The company hired to do the audit is not in the business of auditing elections.

LOL. False. You can watch them do it via live stream.

Wrong. They don't even advertise election audits on their own website. They promote themselves as a cyber-security firm. They have no experience in auditing elections, handling ballots in accordance within state and federal laws, validating signatures, or counting ballots. That's not what they do.

Cyber Ninjas

cyberninjas.com

>That company is not credited to audit an election.

I think the word you are looking for is accredited, but since you can't spell it, you certainly can't explain it without googling something. They obviously have the accreditation required by the Arizona Senate.

No, they don't. Only these companies are and Cyber Ninjas is not on the list...

Accredited Laboratories | U.S. Election Assistance Commission

The following voting system test laboratories have been accredited by EAC to test voting systems.

www.eac.gov

>That company went into this process biased, already believing there was fraud.

Now you are a mind reader? I've read they are impartial.

Who needs to read minds when these idiots have Twitter?

https://www.azmirror.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/logan-twitter-fraud-real-rt.png

>They won't reveal who's financing the bulk of this operation.

Obviously the taxpayers, duh.

No, not so obvious. Arizona tax payers paid only $150,000 out of millions. So who's funding the rest? They refuse to say.

>It was discovered one of their ballot reviewers is a "stop the steal" Trumplican who lost his election in November and whose own name is on the ballots.

Hahahahahahahaha. That's hilarious!

LOL

Which of those women are reviewing ballots with their own name on them because they ran in the 2020 election? That's the problem. What was their job? You can't say from that photo. It certainly doesn't look like they're counting ballots. And bias isn't the issue. That's why veracious recounts insist on having both major parties reviewing every ballot. This audit does not enforce that.

both major parties reviewing every ballot.

None of that was done Nov. 3rd and days afterwards and you did not say a thing.

Liar.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/11/05/arizona-election-protest-votes/

​

Speaking briefly to The Post, Harrison falsely claimed there are no Republicans in the elections center processing ballots. Pairs of people from opposite political parties worked jointly to examine ballots Wednesday night.​

That you have to lie shows how fragile your position is.

The WP calls no one a liar. They have 0 credibility.

LOL

Your concession is duly noted.

Boy, are you dumb.

 

[Faun]

> The company hired to do the audit is not in the business of auditing elections.

LOL. False. You can watch them do it via live stream.

Wrong. They don't even advertise election audits on their own website. They promote themselves as a cyber-security firm. They have no experience in auditing elections, handling ballots in accordance within state and federal laws, validating signatures, or counting ballots. That's not what they do.

Cyber Ninjas

cyberninjas.com

>That company is not credited to audit an election.

I think the word you are looking for is accredited, but since you can't spell it, you certainly can't explain it without googling something. They obviously have the accreditation required by the Arizona Senate.

No, they don't. Only these companies are and Cyber Ninjas is not on the list...

Accredited Laboratories | U.S. Election Assistance Commission

The following voting system test laboratories have been accredited by EAC to test voting systems.

www.eac.gov

>That company went into this process biased, already believing there was fraud.

Now you are a mind reader? I've read they are impartial.

Who needs to read minds when these idiots have Twitter?

https://www.azmirror.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/logan-twitter-fraud-real-rt.png

>They won't reveal who's financing the bulk of this operation.

Obviously the taxpayers, duh.

No, not so obvious. Arizona tax payers paid only $150,000 out of millions. So who's funding the rest? They refuse to say.

>It was discovered one of their ballot reviewers is a "stop the steal" Trumplican who lost his election in November and whose own name is on the ballots.

Hahahahahahahaha. That's hilarious!

LOL

Which of those women are reviewing ballots with their own name on them because they ran in the 2020 election? That's the problem. What was their job? You can't say from that photo. It certainly doesn't look like they're counting ballots. And bias isn't the issue. That's why veracious recounts insist on having both major parties reviewing every ballot. This audit does not enforce that.

both major parties reviewing every ballot.

None of that was done Nov. 3rd and days afterwards and you did not say a thing.

Liar.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/11/05/arizona-election-protest-votes/

​

Speaking briefly to The Post, Harrison falsely claimed there are no Republicans in the elections center processing ballots. Pairs of people from opposite political parties worked jointly to examine ballots Wednesday night.​

That you have to lie shows how fragile your position is.

The WP calls no one a liar. They have 0 credibility.

LOL

Your concession is duly noted.

Boy, are you dumb.

Not as dumb as to deny reality.

 

[Lastamender]

Maricopa audit bombshell: Election officials did NOT have admin control of elections

Maricopa County election officials admitted to auditors today that they do not have possession of administrative passwords that grant full control over the voting machines used in the 2020 election. Those machines and ballots are currently being audited by a third party group hired by the state...

americanconservativemovement.com

Maricopa County election officials admitted to auditors today that they do not have possession of administrative passwords that grant full control over the voting machines used in the 2020 election. Those machines and ballots are currently being audited by a third party group hired by the state Senate to determine the degree of voter fraud that took place in November.

Election officials have no right to outsource their job. The election should be cancelled just for that.

 

[Lastamender]

> The company hired to do the audit is not in the business of auditing elections.

LOL. False. You can watch them do it via live stream.

Wrong. They don't even advertise election audits on their own website. They promote themselves as a cyber-security firm. They have no experience in auditing elections, handling ballots in accordance within state and federal laws, validating signatures, or counting ballots. That's not what they do.

Cyber Ninjas

cyberninjas.com

>That company is not credited to audit an election.

I think the word you are looking for is accredited, but since you can't spell it, you certainly can't explain it without googling something. They obviously have the accreditation required by the Arizona Senate.

No, they don't. Only these companies are and Cyber Ninjas is not on the list...

Accredited Laboratories | U.S. Election Assistance Commission

The following voting system test laboratories have been accredited by EAC to test voting systems.

www.eac.gov

>That company went into this process biased, already believing there was fraud.

Now you are a mind reader? I've read they are impartial.

Who needs to read minds when these idiots have Twitter?

https://www.azmirror.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/logan-twitter-fraud-real-rt.png

>They won't reveal who's financing the bulk of this operation.

Obviously the taxpayers, duh.

No, not so obvious. Arizona tax payers paid only $150,000 out of millions. So who's funding the rest? They refuse to say.

>It was discovered one of their ballot reviewers is a "stop the steal" Trumplican who lost his election in November and whose own name is on the ballots.

Hahahahahahahaha. That's hilarious!

LOL

Which of those women are reviewing ballots with their own name on them because they ran in the 2020 election? That's the problem. What was their job? You can't say from that photo. It certainly doesn't look like they're counting ballots. And bias isn't the issue. That's why veracious recounts insist on having both major parties reviewing every ballot. This audit does not enforce that.

both major parties reviewing every ballot.

None of that was done Nov. 3rd and days afterwards and you did not say a thing.

Liar.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/11/05/arizona-election-protest-votes/

​

Speaking briefly to The Post, Harrison falsely claimed there are no Republicans in the elections center processing ballots. Pairs of people from opposite political parties worked jointly to examine ballots Wednesday night.​

That you have to lie shows how fragile your position is.

The WP calls no one a liar. They have 0 credibility.

LOL

Your concession is duly noted.

Boy, are you dumb.

Not as dumb as to deny reality.

Your narrative is not reality, it is a huge lie.

 

[colfax_m]

Is that why Nevada had a machine do it? Do you know if a machine was used in Arizona?

What the hell does Nevada have to do with anything?

You should spend a little effort attempting to answer your own questions rather than me doing the work for you. It'll teach you some self-sufficiency.

 

[Lastamender]

The fact that the County does not have system administrators who have administrative access to the Dominion voting machines is a big concern. By allowing Dominion to have the administration access only, the County has basically turned over the system to the Dominion voting machine system people. There is no IT control here because that’s been ceded to Dominion.