Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, I think that what you’ll probably end up with is OBD notifying the local law enforcement folks that there may be an impaired driver.
The other day I rented a car and that stuff was “turned on”. The steering wheel vibrated at times when I was changing lanes, passing slower cars, and even once when I was pulling back onto the road telling me that I hadn’t “rested” long enough.
Yep, guilty of not being intoxicated ("innocent") until indicated otherwise. And then? Still not arrested or proven guilty of anything. Boy, what a hardship! Cheese?So innocent until proven guilty You are presuming guilt until proven innocent.
Canadians, they will give up their right without an issue, hopefully America never gets that complacent.
What? New cars have sensors all around. No automatic GPS. You're out of your flippin' mind.So then your car will now have to be connected to GPS 100% of the time and
With OBD III there is already this capability; that’s been around since like 2000 or so.So then your car will now have to be connected to GPS 100% of the time and have the ability to contact every police dept in the country. You are basically saying that there will be 100% surveillance of you everywhere you go in a car.
With OBD III there is already this capability; that’s been around since like 2000 or so.
You asked me what I thought was going to happen...and I said that I thought it would flag a driver who keeps violating safety laws. We’ll see in 2026 I suppose.
Added..Did you even read the post I was responding to ?
No you didn't
Moron
IdjitNew cars have sensors all around. No automatic GPS. You're out of your flippin' mind.
So you didn't read the post where the other person said that the in car monitoring system would most likely alert local authorities did you?Added..
Idjit
Being capable of wirelessly transmitting onboard diagnostic data does not require or imply involvement of GPS.With OBD III there is already this capability; that’s been around since like 2000 or so.
So you didn't read the post where the other person said that the in car monitoring system would most likely alert local authorities did you?
No you didn't and you look like a fucking idiot responding about shit you didn't bother to read.
Way to miss the point!If it was going to alert the authorities it would have to send GPS data, Idiot.
Spoken like a true scum-sucking fascist who is jiggy with the state running every aspect of her life! She doesn't mind the government basically accusing her of intoxication everytime she drives with the driver then having to prove his innocence! Just wait until the day you get in your car and the thing malfunctions and won't let you start the car due to an erroneous reading despite your being totally sober leaving you stranded in an emergency!Your car is not an extension of your home and it is illegal to drive under the influence of alcohol. Driving a car is not a protected right under the Constitution.
No. What people are saying is that unlike you, they value their right to privacy and reject invasive government intrusion which YOU will be forced to pay for.So what you’re saying is that you want the right to break the law with impunity because your car is “an extension of your home”.
Hey you're the moron who didn't read her post or if you did you didn't understand it.Way to miss the point!
No, I think that what you’ll probably end up with is OBD notifying the local law enforcement folks that there may be an impaired driver.
Its a very short walk between the two. I don’t really see what the big deal is. We have cameras on the highways now watching what you do.Being capable of wirelessly transmitting onboard diagnostic data does not require or imply involvement of GPS.
Way ahead you son, as usual..Hey you're the moron who didn't read her post or if you did you didn't understand it.
This is what she said and what I responded to
Did you not understand that?
Do you need me to explain it to you?
Me neither, but having transmitted data vs. video of a driver's appearance is like having an email vs. talking to an answering machineIts a very short walk between the two. I don’t really see what the big deal is. We have cameras on the highways now watching what you do.
You only wished it was a whine, you are a sensitive little guy, but the Dragonlady‘s post compared a convicted person to an innocent person, sorry you can’t read there little skippy.Yep, guilty of not being intoxicated ("innocent") until indicated otherwise. And then? Still not arrested or proven guilty of anything. Boy, what a hardship! Cheese?
LeYou only wished it was a whine, you are a sensitive little guy, but the Dragonlady‘s post compared a convicted person to an innocent person, sorry you can’t read there little skippy.
Also, one carrying a cell phone can already be tracked anywhere available to GPS satellites. However GPS transmits nothing but position data. "The government" will never be using it to monitor one's alcohol intake, for example. We have enough wacky conspiracy theorists here without giving them any more ideas, lol!We have cameras on the highways now watching what you do.
