Sure, he wants to avoid responsibility for something he helped create.Mitch wants the dems to use Reconciliation, or the government shuts down. Should be an easy choice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Sure, he wants to avoid responsibility for something he helped create.Mitch wants the dems to use Reconciliation, or the government shuts down. Should be an easy choice.
1. Government shuts downSure, he wants to avoid responsibility for something he helped create.
Lying to the American people is not 'playing a game'Well of course the Democrats play every game possible.
I know. It's all on the other guys.Lying to the American people is not 'playing a game'
Engaging in Fear-Mongering, threats, extortion, and intimidation is not 'playing a game'
Being intentionally, fiscally irresponsible and criminal, risking our national security is not 'playing a game'
Villainizing and singling out groups of people, inciting division and hatred, is not 'playing a game'
Minimizing intentional corrupt / criminal behavior, behavior that endangers US lives and risks our national security is enabling such dangerous / criminal actions and protecting the criminals who do it.
You hypocritically accuse me of being like you, falsely claiming I have some 'tribe' I partisanly defend.; yet you attack Conservatives and Republicans all the time, defend Marxist criminal Democrats, and do not voice condemnation of Democrats, do not call them out.
Sorry if it offends you for me to say, But Biden lied to Americans, claiming the reason raising the debt ceiling was needed because of previous REPUBLICAN spending. You seem to consider little is wrong with doing so because they are just 'playing a game'. I call THAT pathetic and an attempted defense of a proven corrupt, criminal Democrat who has destroyed his own credibility.
I just finished making the point that Biden lied his ass off, spreading lies and misinformation by claiming what you just posted: 'It's the other guys' fault. President 'The Buck Stops Here' just - again - blamed others and others alone.I know. It's all on the other guys.
Whatever you say. It's all on the other side.Failed attempt to spin / flip the discussion, make light of the point made. Thank you for helping me make the point.
You falsely claim that this is what I am saying yet remain silent when Dementia Joe says EXACTLY that.Whatever you say. It's all on the other side.
I could believe the democrats cared about current spending if they would freeze future budgets or at least make a solid effort to restrain unnecessary spending, but they have not done, are not doing, and will not do that. Thus, I do not for a moment buy the sob story that they're only concerned about meeting our current obligations. Not at all, and to pretend they are is to propagate a falsehood.Your answer appears to be that we should default on America's obligations.
Do you have any idea what that would cause? Any idea at all?
I guess that would be okay now, so you could blame it on the Democrats.
I doubt you said this when Trump was in office.
You're welcome, Trumpster!You falsely claim that this is what I am saying yet remain silent when Dementia Joe says EXACTLY that.
Thanks for proving you are a hypocritical, pathetic Democrat/Biden apologist.
your question should be posed to the Dims. They are in charge.You didn't answer my question.
Do you want us to default on our obligations?
And if so, is it a coincidence that you didn't want this when a Republican President was in office and signed off on our budget?
The Dems aren't even trying to claim that they want to cut spending.I could believe the democrats cared about current spending if they would freeze future budgets or at least make a solid effort to restrain unnecessary spending, but they have not done, are not doing, and will not do that. Thus, I do not for a moment buy the sob story that they're only concerned about meeting our current obligations. Not at all, and to pretend they are is to propagate a falsehood.
That's okay, I wasn't expecting a straight answer.your question should be posed to the Dims. They are in charge.
you get what you give around here I suppose.That's okay, I wasn't expecting a straight answer.
You suppose wrong. I answer direct questions. You dodge them.you get what you give around here I suppose.
At least somebody is. Quite frankly, that's the ONLY way we forestall the otherwise inevitable crash, but no one has credibly made the point that Washington legislators are the best and brightest the country has to offer.The Dems aren't even trying to claim that they want to cut spending.
The Republicans are.
Dummy, if they are "tied together" how did Manchin vote to increase debt ceiling and NOT the 3.5T spending bill liberals are pushing for?The 2 are not mutually exclusive. There is NO $5.5 trillion criminally, fiscally irresponsible Democrat pork-bloated bill passed if the debt ceiling is not increased. Democrats don't give a damn about paying off old debt - they are not looking back at what they have done to get to this point, they are looking forward to that $5.5 trillion bill they want and know they can't get it unless that debt ceiling is raised AT LEAST by that amount. NO MORE spending of that kind, unnecessary, self-serving spending without the debt ceiling increased.
The 2 are completely tied together.
Without the debt ceiling being raised Democrats can't have their $5.5 Trillion dollar pork-infested deficit spending bill. That is how they are tired together. You aren't very bright...Dummy, if they are "tied together" how did Manchin vote to increase debt ceiling and NOT the 3.5T spending bill liberals are pushing for?
Like I said said, too dumb not to peddle bs.