Man Made Global Warming strikes again this weekend.

[Sunsettommy]

Why do I have to explain this to you every single time this kinda thing happens?

Do you have serious memory issues or are you being willfully stupid?

Anyway, here goes, yet again:

Global warming weakens the Jetstream. the stream is what keep all the arctic cold air in the artic. When the Jetstream weakens is can bend and flex more than usual letting the cold down from the artic into the temperate zones.

View attachment 1211127



Need more help or have you got it finally?

BWAHAHAHAHAHA you made that up as we were getting them even more often during the global cooling time from the 1940's to the 1970's.

Do you ever look at the AO index?

LINK

 

[Sunsettommy]

View attachment 1211544

This is your photo when you were getting your treatments, I have to say it failed try again......

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why do I have to explain this to you every single time this kinda thing happens?

Do you have serious memory issues or are you being willfully stupid?

Anyway, here goes, yet again:

Global warming weakens the Jetstream. the stream is what keep all the arctic cold air in the artic. When the Jetstream weakens is can bend and flex more than usual letting the cold down from the artic into the temperate zones.

View attachment 1211127



Need more help or have you got it finally?

Global warming weakens the Jetstream.

Sounds serious!

DURR

 

[Nostra]

I guess the CURRENT ARCTIC BLAST hitting a large portion of the country as I type isn’t a CURRANT EVENT,

Dont Taz Me Bro

 

[EMH]

Record high temps, they scream global warming.

Record low temps, they scream climate change.


If Earth was warming, which it is not, we would have NO RECORD LOWS....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Record high temps, they scream global warming.

Record low temps, they scream climate change.


If Earth was warming, which it is not, we would have NO RECORD LOWS....

Still no Earth data to support your claims. Weird.

 

[Old Rocks]

Why do I have to explain this to you every single time this kinda thing happens?

Do you have serious memory issues or are you being willfully stupid?

Anyway, here goes, yet again:

Global warming weakens the Jetstream. the stream is what keep all the arctic cold air in the artic. When the Jetstream weakens is can bend and flex more than usual letting the cold down from the artic into the temperate zones.

View attachment 1211127



Need more help or have you got it finally?

The whackadoodles on this board will never get it. They hold their willful ignorance dearly. They are exactly the same kind of people that keep rebuilding their houses on a flood plain a foot above ground level knowing they have a 3 foot flood about every ten years. Dumb-de-dumb dumb.

 

[Old Rocks]

Your post fails any evidence man weakened the Jetstream. I have to say, that’s a new one for me. I guess when all the other claims go to shit you just keep moving to the next,


MMGW, the ultimate long-distance goalpost tote in human history.

Of course that is a new one on you. You have chosen willful ignorance and also to demonstrate that ignorance for the whole world to see. I will post this for those that have actual intellect enough to understand what is presented. I am sure that does not include you.

 

[EMH]

Still no Earth data to support your claims. Weird.

Defending the CO2 FRAUD's 2005 FUDGE JOB on atmospheric temps again, you "skeptic" you...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Defending the CO2 FRAUD's 2005 FUDGE JOB on atmospheric temps again, you "skeptic" you...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

Awesome!

Still no evidence that when temperatures rise at any (and every) location on Earth, that SAP also rises?

I'm shocked at your continued fact-free whining.

 

[EMH]

when temperatures rise at any (and every) location on Earth, that SAP also rises?

LOL!!!

SAP is a planetary measure. When a planet gets closer to Sun, does it warm?

LOL!!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

LOL!!!

SAP is a planetary measure. When a planet gets closer to Sun, does it warm?

LOL!!!

SAP is a planetary measure.

The SAP today, in Chicago, is the same as the SAP, today, in Australia?

Are you sure?

Link?

When a planet gets closer to Sun, does it warm?

And when it gets warmer, does air pressure decline?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I have 10 inches.

The snow on the ground is about 12 inches now, but was 9 inches when I measured it about 45 minutes ago.

Aren't you proud? Is your wife happy or sad about that?

 

[Crepitus]

The whackadoodles on this board will never get it. They hold their willful ignorance dearly. They are exactly the same kind of people that keep rebuilding their houses on a flood plain a foot above ground level knowing they have a 3 foot flood about every ten years. Dumb-de-dumb dumb.

I explain it every single time we have one of these events and they always pretend it's something I just made up on the spot.

 

[EMH]

The SAP today, in Chicago, is the same as the SAP, today, in Australia?

SAP is constant at sea level. SAP is a planetary issue, not a local issue. But, as a faux skeptic, all you can do is try to make it about local weather.


GoogAI

The standard atmospheric pressure on Earth at sea level is 1013.25 hectopascals (hPa), which is equal to 1013.25 millibars (mb).


Meaning the standard is planetary at sea level. Local weather like hurricanes and high pressure heat domes may alter short term, but the average has stood for decades if not centuries to 5 digits...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

SAP is constant at sea level. SAP is a planetary issue, not a local issue. But, as a faux skeptic, all you can do is try to make it about local weather.


GoogAI

The standard atmospheric pressure on Earth at sea level is 1013.25 hectopascals (hPa), which is equal to 1013.25 millibars (mb).


Meaning the standard is planetary at sea level. Local weather like hurricanes and high pressure heat domes may alter short term, but the average has stood for decades if not centuries to 5 digits...

SAP is constant at sea level.

If it's a constant, why do we bother to measure it?

Local weather like hurricanes and high pressure heat domes may alter short term

It's a constant, but it changes. Hilarious!

the average has stood for decades if not centuries to 5 digits...

Which is why you posted a graph that shows it declining since the 1960s.

DURR

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

SAP is constant at sea level. SAP is a planetary issue, not a local issue. But, as a faux skeptic, all you can do is try to make it about local weather.


GoogAI

The standard atmospheric pressure on Earth at sea level is 1013.25 hectopascals (hPa), which is equal to 1013.25 millibars (mb).


Meaning the standard is planetary at sea level. Local weather like hurricanes and high pressure heat domes may alter short term, but the average has stood for decades if not centuries to 5 digits...

all you can do is try to make it about local weather.

If all the local weather shows colder = higher SAP and warmer = lower SAP,
then averaging them altogether will show the same.

 

[EMH]

If it's a constant, why do we bother to measure it?

It does change. It changes when the planet warms or cools, which is all about how much ice is on Earth, which is all about where the land is relative to the poles.

It's a constant, but it changes. Hilarious!

Not really, the "local weather" is noise that washes out over time, why the STANDARD has stood for decades down to 5 digits...

Which is why you posted a graph that shows it declining since the 1960s.

Anyone with any sense of data interpretation looks at that chart and notices two things...


1. the chart is flat to down, not enough data to conclude either yet
2. the slight drop in the chart is ridiculously small, 1015 to 1014 over 60 years, well within the data's variance.

 

[EMH]

our claim would be more convincing if you posted Earth temperature and SAP data, instead of running away like a Nazi *****.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So much for your constant claim.

DURR