JustAGuy1
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2019
- 18,188
- 15,925
- 2,290
when i read yer posts - all that goes thru my head is:
Yup, a 12 year old at best.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
when i read yer posts - all that goes thru my head is:
Sounds like Congesstionsl interference with the judiciary. SCOTUS should slap that down.J.D. Vance plans to put holds on all Justice Department nominees, slowing the confirmation process amid Donald Trump's federal indictment.
What's happening: Sen. J.D. Vance is seeking some modicum of revenge for the second indictment of former President Donald Trump. And he'll make his move on the Senate floor.
Details: The Ohio Republican is going to put holds on all nominees to the Department of Justice. That means all nominees will require procedural votes and confirmation votes; any one senator can slow down nominees, but a simple majority is required both for a procedural vote and final confirmation.
“If Merrick Garland wants to use these officials to harass Joe Biden’s political opponents, we will grind his department to a halt," he said in a statement.
![]()
J.D. Vance plans to put holds on all Justice Department nominees, slowing the confirmation process amid Donald Trump's federal indictment.
News and analysis from Capitol Hill for when you only have a few minutes, from POLITICO.www.politico.com
MAGA Promises Tit For Tat ‘Retribution’
One of the big arguments from the center right, and GOP presidential candidates, in response to the Trump indictment has been that it’s going to make prosecutions of politicians a regular feature of American politics.
It’s an argument that doesn’t address the reality we’re in: well-documented allegations of unopposed lawbreaking by a President for years and years, or the consequences of impunity for the powers.
It also falls just short of being a threat: we’re going to prosecute Democratic politicians once we’re in power. To be clear, that’s not a bad thing in itself: the powerful should be prosecuted if they’re found to have committed crimes, regardless of political party.
But some of Trump’s MAGA cohorts take it way further, promising “retribution” once back in office.
Kimberly Guilfoyle, Don Jr.’s fiancee and a MAGA influencer, posted a photo on Instagram saying “RETRIBUTION IS COMING.”
MAGA Threats Mass Around Mar-a-Lago Miami Hearing
I suspect there will be more flailing, ineffectual, juvenile attempts on the part of congressional nitwits to prove their fidelity to Dear Leader to The Following.
I defy you to find one post where I questioned Carter's religion or honesty. However, he was still the worst POTUS in the US------------until Biden.
Let's compare President Carter with President Reagan.I defy you to find one post where I questioned Carter's religion or honesty. However, he was still the worst POTUS in the US------------until Biden.
Bullshit. The seventies were one big recession. Apparently you're too young to remember Ford's WIN (Whip Inflation Now). Don't get your panties in a wad because someone attacked Carter's presidency. I just told you I think Carter was an honorable man, probably the most honorable in my lifetime. He was a lousy president.six month recession.
Gasoline lines started with the OPEC oil embargo of the mid 70s, dude. You can push that bullshit on these young folks that weren't alive, but I lived it and remember it well. Your "facts" are not.The inflation and gasoline lines that began in 1979
You are correct. The shah or Khomeini had nothing to do with the economic problems and oil prices of the time. Carter's response to the embassy occupation was inept to be kind. He was not up to the task of dealing with that event and that was why he was not reelected. I voted for Carter the first time. I discovered the error of my ways in the ensuing four years.The Shah was never a popular monarch.
As I expected you ignored the facts I documented. The stagflation of the 1970's began during the Nixon Administration. It happened in response to the OPEC Embargo of 1973.Bullshit. The seventies were one big recession. Apparently you're too young to remember Ford's WIN (Whip Inflation Now). Don't get your panties in a wad because someone attacked Carter's presidency. I just told you I think Carter was an honorable man, probably the most honorable in my lifetime. He was a lousy president.
Gasoline lines started with the OPEC oil embargo of the mid 70s, dude. You can push that bullshit on these young folks that weren't alive, but I lived it and remember it well. Your "facts" are not.
Once the embassy employees were taken hostage there was little Carter could do without endangering the lives of the hostages.You are correct. The shah or Khomeini had nothing to do with the economic problems and oil prices of the time. Carter's response to the embassy occupation was inept to be kind. He was not up to the task of dealing with that event and that was why he was not reelected. I voted for Carter the first time. I discovered the error of my ways in the ensuing four years.
You're contradicting yourself. From your post #145, The inflation and gasoline lines that began in 1979. You also stated that Carter presided over 6 month recession. Run along.The stagflation of the 1970's began during the Nixon Administration. It happened in response to the OPEC Embargo of 1973.
This is another point that you are not aware of. As a Marine, in the late 60s, I was a candidate for Embassy duty. The very first thing we were told when we applied was that we were expendable. Those hostages knew that. Carter should never have allowed the entire country to be held hostage for those 52 Americans. If he had nuked Tehran and showed the world that the US will not be held hostage to terrorists, the world would look a lot different today.Once the embassy employees were taken hostage there was little Carter could do without endangering the lives of the hostages.
Same thing.Funny. I thought they just hated anybody that wasn't a trump MAGA Party Kool Aid drinker or still believed in our country.
I should have said that they got worse.You're contradicting yourself. From your post #145, The inflation and gasoline lines that began in 1979. You also stated that Carter presided over 6 month recession. Run along.
Trump cares abut himself first, his family second, and rich people third. He only pretends to love the poorly educated people who love him and who believe his lies.You thought wrong. Trump believes in America and regular Americans. The Bidenista party hates US.
You have not presented any facts. Wikipedia is hardly a reputable source. You might as well have used CNN.I should have said that they got worse.
If that is the best you can do, it is not good enough. Your feelings do not stand up to my facts. I doubt you even knew about the CIA assisted coup that imposed an absolute Monarch on the Iranian people in 1953.
Carter 1980 recession
January 1980 –
July 1980
highest unemployment rate:
7.8%
(July 1980)
Reagan 1981–1982 recession
July 1981 –
November 1982
highest unemployment rate:
10.8%
(November 1982)
Look it up yourself
![]()
List of recessions in the United States - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
You disagreed with my post #146, I just told you I think Carter was an honorable man. Do you always contradict yourself? LMAOAs I expected you ignored the facts I documented. The stagflation of the 1970's began during the Nixon Administration. It happened in response to the OPEC Embargo of 1973.
The Iranian Revolution of 1979, which I have already mentioned, made things worse. Considering what President Carter was up against, he handled his challenges well.
Nuking Tehran would have killed the hostages. It would have lowered the threshold on the Soviet Union and Communist China going nuclear.This is another point that you are not aware of. As a Marine, in the late 60s, I was a candidate for Embassy duty. The very first thing we were told when we applied was that we were expendable. Those hostages knew that. Carter should never have allowed the entire country to be held hostage for those 52 Americans. If he had nuked Tehran and showed the world that the US will not be held hostage to terrorists, the world would look a lot different today.
And left the world worse for the wear.Nuking Tehran would have killed the hostages. It would have lowered the threshold on the Soviet Union and Communist China going nuclear.
Instead, we got the hostages back alive.
Here are some more facts for you to ignore:You have not presented any facts. Wikipedia is hardly a reputable source. You might as well have used CNN.
The hostages did not think so. Neither do I. Nuclear brinkmanship is catastrophically dangerous.And left the world worse for the wear.