Lying About The Nuclear Deal

[Derideo_Te]

In fact, a French negotiator recently recommended that Congress can reject the deal and that the United States will be able to get a better one about two years later.

Once again PoliticalSpice throws out bogus claims that her links don't support.

 

[Redfish]

You didn't read the treaty, any of it.

The reference is to the military bases that are not included in the treaty itself, not nuclear or design facilities.

Please read. If we had sent you our as our negotiator, the Iranians would have been parading down PA avenue by now.

If I was the negotiator, our 4 american political prisoners would be on US soil before the negotiations started. I would have said: "before we start you need to understand that we have the capability to turn your entire country into radioactive dust and if you continue to send terrorists to kill americans we will do just that, now lets talk about how you are going to dismantle your nuclear program"

We had all the cards but Kerry and obozo got ourplayed by the ayatollahs.

 

[Derideo_Te]

You didn't read the treaty, any of it.

The reference is to the military bases that are not included in the treaty itself, not nuclear or design facilities.

Please read. If we had sent you our as our negotiator, the Iranians would have been parading down PA avenue by now.

If I was the negotiator, our 4 american political prisoners would be on US soil before the negotiations started. I would have said: "before we start you need to understand that we have the capability to turn your entire country into radioactive dust and if you continue to send terrorists to kill americans we will do just that, now lets talk about how you are going to dismantle your nuclear program"

We had all the cards but Kerry and obozo got ourplayed by the ayatollahs.

If you said something that stupid they would have kept the prisoners as a human shield.

You really are clueless!

 

[Redfish]

PC, folks like you are not going to allowed to give Iran a window of 10 months to finish a bomb, which would force us into a war.

That will not happen.

total horseshit, nothing in kerry's deal prevents Iran from making a bomb. What exactly are we going to do to stop them? Give them a verbal tongue lashing?

Your naivete is amazing.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Redfish's far right wing reactionary world view is why Cruz, Perry, Santorum, etc., can never be our party's nominee for President.

The bozo wants a war with Iran, period.

 

[Redfish]

You didn't read the treaty, any of it.

The reference is to the military bases that are not included in the treaty itself, not nuclear or design facilities.

Please read. If we had sent you our as our negotiator, the Iranians would have been parading down PA avenue by now.

If I was the negotiator, our 4 american political prisoners would be on US soil before the negotiations started. I would have said: "before we start you need to understand that we have the capability to turn your entire country into radioactive dust and if you continue to send terrorists to kill americans we will do just that, now lets talk about how you are going to dismantle your nuclear program"

We had all the cards but Kerry and obozo got ourplayed by the ayatollahs.

If you said something that stupid they would have kept the prisoners as a human shield.

You really are clueless!

Then I would have said. "OK, those people are going to die either way, so if they are not released in 10 days we will unleash the full force of the US military on you" And I would have sat down with Putin first and told him that if he got in the way, Moscow would be next.

you fuckers want us to police the world but you want us to do it by singing songs to people who want us dead. Said another way, you are idiots.

 

[francoHFW]

You didn't read the treaty, any of it.

The reference is to the military bases that are not included in the treaty itself, not nuclear or design facilities.

Please read. If we had sent you our as our negotiator, the Iranians would have been parading down PA avenue by now.

If I was the negotiator, our 4 american political prisoners would be on US soil before the negotiations started. I would have said: "before we start you need to understand that we have the capability to turn your entire country into radioactive dust and if you continue to send terrorists to kill americans we will do just that, now lets talk about how you are going to dismantle your nuclear program"

We had all the cards but Kerry and obozo got ourplayed by the ayatollahs.

They're also Iranian citizens, and everyone in the world but bogus US and Isreali RWers and their ignorant hater dupes know its a good deal and Iranians aren't suicidal.

 

[Redfish]

Redfish's far right wing reactionary world view is why Cruz, Perry, Santorum, etc., can never be our party's nominee for President.

The bozo wants a war with Iran, period.

don't worry, YOUR party will never nominate either of them, you are stuck with the hildebeast.

 

[Redfish]

Redfish's far right wing reactionary world view is why Cruz, Perry, Santorum, etc., can never be our party's nominee for President.

The bozo wants a war with Iran, period.

did Neville Chamberlain want war with Germany? He said exactly what obozo is saying, and we all know where that led.

Damn but you are ignorant.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Redfish's far right wing reactionary world view is why Cruz, Perry, Santorum, etc., can never be our party's nominee for President.

The bozo wants a war with Iran, period.

Once upon a time in the dim and distant past when sane conservatives like Bill Buckley jr were still around war was always the last resort.

Too bad they are now an endangered species that has been virtually wiped out by the virulent and rabid extremist rightwankers who can't open their mouths without drooling on themselves.

 

[nat4900]

A good negotiator would have said " Ok Iranians, you release our 4 americans that you are holding and THEN we will talk about your nukes and the lifting of sanctions. No deal will be discussed until those 4 people are home safe.

Should we "swap"???

Iran’s Foreign Ministry have announced that 15 Iranians are at present held in US prisons, mostly on charges related to sanctions against Iran. - See more at: Iranians abroad Prison life terms and execution Middle East Eye

 

[PoliticalChic]

In fact, a French negotiator recently recommended that Congress can reject the deal and that the United States will be able to get a better one about two years later.

Once again PoliticalSpice throws out bogus claims that her links don't support.

Let's smash that back down your lying throat:

"Hollande's senior adviser expresses misgivings about the nuclear deal reached with Iran according to Bloomberg report; official tweets denial of report.

According to both lawmakers Audibert expressed support for the deal overall, "but also directly disputed Kerry’s claim that a Congressional rejection of the Iran deal would result in the worst of all worlds, the collapse of sanctions and Iran racing to the bomb without restrictions."

“He basically said, if Congress votes this down, there will be some saber-rattling and some chaos for a year or two, but in the end nothing will change and Iran will come back to the table to negotiate again and that would be to our advantage,” Sanchez told Josh Rogin of Bloomberg View.

“He thought if the Congress voted it down, that we could get a better deal,” Sanchez added.
Report Top French official says if Congress rejects Iran deal a better deal could be achieved - Middle East - Jerusalem Post


In your face, ug.

 

[Derideo_Te]

In fact, a French negotiator recently recommended that Congress can reject the deal and that the United States will be able to get a better one about two years later.

Once again PoliticalSpice throws out bogus claims that her links don't support.

Let's smash that back down your lying throat:

"Hollande's senior adviser expresses misgivings about the nuclear deal reached with Iran according to Bloomberg report; official tweets denial of report.

According to both lawmakers Audibert expressed support for the deal overall, "but also directly disputed Kerry’s claim that a Congressional rejection of the Iran deal would result in the worst of all worlds, the collapse of sanctions and Iran racing to the bomb without restrictions."

“He basically said, if Congress votes this down, there will be some saber-rattling and some chaos for a year or two, but in the end nothing will change and Iran will come back to the table to negotiate again and that would be to our advantage,” Sanchez told Josh Rogin of Bloomberg View.

“He thought if the Congress voted it down, that we could get a better deal,” Sanchez added.
Report Top French official says if Congress rejects Iran deal a better deal could be achieved - Middle East - Jerusalem Post


In your face, ug.

at PoliticalSpice proving that she had failed to provide the proper link to support her anti-American tirade.

 

[Redfish]

A good negotiator would have said " Ok Iranians, you release our 4 americans that you are holding and THEN we will talk about your nukes and the lifting of sanctions. No deal will be discussed until those 4 people are home safe.

Should we "swap"???

Iran’s Foreign Ministry have announced that 15 Iranians are at present held in US prisons, mostly on charges related to sanctions against Iran. - See more at: Iranians abroad Prison life terms and execution Middle East Eye

that would be a topic of a real negotiation.

 

[nat4900]

Right wingers on this thread are either moronic war-mongers...or blatant Obama haters (probably both).....

1. Sanctions against Iran have NOT worked...Russia, China and several European countries are supplying Iran with virtually everything except maybe some sesame seed buns.

2. War is always an alternative....but with Iran 4 times the size of Iraq, with a powerful navy and air force, the prospect of war is insane.....(but we already knew that.)

3. The only alternative left is what Obama has helped to negotiate....a POSTPONEMENT of what is ultimately inevitable (a nuclear Iran), in the hope that moderate Iranians will yank off the yoke imposed upon them by religious zealots.

 

[PoliticalChic]

In fact, a French negotiator recently recommended that Congress can reject the deal and that the United States will be able to get a better one about two years later.

Once again PoliticalSpice throws out bogus claims that her links don't support.

Let's smash that back down your lying throat:

"Hollande's senior adviser expresses misgivings about the nuclear deal reached with Iran according to Bloomberg report; official tweets denial of report.

According to both lawmakers Audibert expressed support for the deal overall, "but also directly disputed Kerry’s claim that a Congressional rejection of the Iran deal would result in the worst of all worlds, the collapse of sanctions and Iran racing to the bomb without restrictions."

“He basically said, if Congress votes this down, there will be some saber-rattling and some chaos for a year or two, but in the end nothing will change and Iran will come back to the table to negotiate again and that would be to our advantage,” Sanchez told Josh Rogin of Bloomberg View.

“He thought if the Congress voted it down, that we could get a better deal,” Sanchez added.
Report Top French official says if Congress rejects Iran deal a better deal could be achieved - Middle East - Jerusalem Post


In your face, ug.

at PoliticalSpice proving that she had failed to provide the proper link to support her anti-American tirade.

Once again....me, right.
You....egg on your kisser.

The same ol' pattern.

And...you attempting a lie to get out of it.

Same ol,' same ol.'

 

[nat4900]

that would be a topic of a real negotiation.

Yeah, you folks were really backing Obama with the Bergdahl swap, weren't you?

 

[Redfish]

Right wingers on this thread are either moronic war-mongers...or blatant Obama haters (probably both).....

1. Sanctions against Iran have NOT worked...Russia, China and several European countries are supplying Iran with virtually everything except maybe some sesame seed buns.

2. War is always an alternative....but with Iran 4 times the size of Iraq, with a powerful navy and air force, the prospect of war is insane.....(but we already knew that.)

3. The only alternative left is what Obama has helped to negotiate,,,,a POSTPONEMENT of what is ultimately inevitable, in the hope that moderate Iranians will yank off the yoke imposed upon them by religious zealots.

1. the sanctions have worked, thats why they even came to the table for this stupid deal, to get them lifted

2. War is more likely with the deal. Israel and Saudi Arabia will not tolerate an Iran with nukes.

3. So the great obama deal just "postpones" an inevitible war? Wow, how wonderful. If its inevitible, why not do it now before they get nukes?

 

[Redfish]

that would be a topic of a real negotiation.

Yeah, you folks were really backing Obama with the Bergdahl swap, weren't you?

No, because he made a terrible deal. 4 terrorists for a deserter and colaborator? Thats not a swap, thats taking it up the ass.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Right wingers on this thread are either moronic war-mongers...or blatant Obama haters (probably both).....

1. Sanctions against Iran have NOT worked...Russia, China and several European countries are supplying Iran with virtually everything except maybe some sesame seed buns.

2. War is always an alternative....but with Iran 4 times the size of Iraq, with a powerful navy and air force, the prospect of war is insane.....(but we already knew that.)

3. The only alternative left is what Obama has helped to negotiate,,,,a POSTPONEMENT of what is ultimately inevitable, in the hope that moderate Iranians will yank off the yoke imposed upon them by religious zealots.

"Right wingers on this thread are either moronic war-mongers....."

Obama, authorizing Iran to gain nuclear weapons....destabilizing the Middle East, giving his blessing to an arms race followed, no doubt, by a war....

The concept of irony has spent the entirety of its existence waiting for you to come along and give it meaning.