Lutecia James won’t stop her vendetta against Trump

That very well may be the case. Good call.... But what does Trump have to do with any of that?

This was a Political Character-Assassination attempt. Period. No other explanation is possible. No other explanation is needed.... We ARE talking dimocrap scum, here... The absolute scum of the Earth
A now-retired Deutsche Bank executive, Nicholas Haigh, testified earlier in the trial that he assumed the figures “were broadly accurate,” though the bank subjected them to ”sanity checks” and sometimes made sizable “haircuts.”

Trump acted as the guarantor for the loans and was quick to act when the bank raised concerns that the properties weren’t generating enough cash to make payments, Williams said. At one point, Trump moved $8.6 million into the Washington hotel’s coffers after its cash flow fell short of a requirement. No payments were missed, and the loans were never found to be in default, Williams said.

After Williams finished testifying, Trump’s lawyers sought — as they repeatedly had before — to have the case thrown out. They argued the bank executive had neutralized any allegations that the defendants deceived the lender about Trump’s wealth.

 
That very well may be the case. Good call.... But what does Trump have to do with any of that?

This was a Political Character-Assassination attempt. Period. No other explanation is possible. No other explanation is needed.... We ARE talking dimocrap scum, here... The absolute scum of the Earth
That’s the point
 
Especially when no appraiser and no banker was charged with anything. Banks are generally closed down or taken over when they do that. Not sure what happens to dishonest appraisers but I'm sure there are consequences.
Dishonest appraisers get handled by the appraisal license people.
 
its still a campaign finance violation, and because of that, the business records falsification is in furtherance of the crime of campaign finance violation.
AI Overview


In 2022, Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) agreed to pay $113,000 to settle a Federal Election Commission (FEC) investigation into whether they violated campaign finance law
.
Just a tad less than Trump. no?
 
He had to provide as statement of financial condition which had lots of made up shit. Trump had appraisals but he didn’t use them, he made up his own numbers.

Is that okay?
i doubt what you say happened. Unless you figure that a bank will forgo its usual due diligence.
 
i doubt what you say happened. Unless you figure that a bank will forgo its usual due diligence.
It’s exactly what happened. Lots of testimony proved it.

The right wing media won’t cover what happened.
 
Dishonest appraisers get handled by the appraisal license people.
The appraisers didn’t do anything dishonest.

Trump just chose to ignore their appraisals and submit his own values, sometimes as much as 10x what it was appraised at.
 
It’s exactly what happened. Lots of testimony proved it.

The right wing media won’t cover what happened.
The testimony was that the bank wasn't defrauded, and they welcome doing business with Trump.

The Judge ignored that and the law.

The rule of law wasn't in that Court room, hence why he's being reversed by the higher Court.
 
No, not like the collateral. But it still mattered.

The banks didn’t know about Trump’s lies but it looks like they probably assumed he was lying.

The NY Post is full of shit. Quote from the actual decision and not right wing tabloids.

He noted it in the decision by did not claim what it was actually worth. He did note the value Trump ascribed assumed that the binding covenant on the property was magically lifted which is a lie.

Just read the decision.

View attachment 1152873
Your ignorance on how this industry works is breathtaking.
 
15th post
What I was told was it has to align with other properties in the area for square footage and location
Yes and no. In the appraising of a unique property, it becomes a "dartboard" appraisal.
 
If Trump would never had run for president, none of this would have ever happened. So, I call bullshit.
That's incorrect because Trump had lawsuits against him before he became president.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom