None of the loans were to build NY properties.None of this has any relevance to the charges.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
None of the loans were to build NY properties.None of this has any relevance to the charges.
The value of anything we own can be subjective as to what it is worth to us vs what it is worth to anybody else. Banks adjust their 'rules' all the time to accommodate a good customer. When we bought our first house in New Mexico we still owned a home with a mortgage in Kansas--it took while to sell that house because of the value we put on it. That meant we didn't quite qualify for the loan on our new home.So, when the alleged victim testifies, they loved the deal, only the Democrat prosecutors charge means something?
Search Assist
The bank, Deutsche Bank, stated that it followed its own guidelines when approving loans to Donald Trump, which included conducting "sanity checks" on the financial statements he provided. However, they did not conduct full appraisals and sometimes adjusted the values Trump reported, indicating that they viewed the information as subjective and reliant on estimates.PBS
Yahoo
I am saying you are clearly too stupid to know what a salary isSo you’re saying the numbers have to represent present conditions. Right? You can’t assume things that haven’t occurred.
Not like the collateral. Again, you don't really seem to understand this. The bank knew full well what Trump was worth.His statement or financial condition was required by the bank. Obviously it mattered.
Lol. I'd put the media I read against yours ANYDAY. Here is an example of mine:That’s a lie. You read dishonest media.
Why don't you link to all the false information you're talking about. And leave MaraLago out. We already know Engoran was a politicized idiot when it came to that.Their decision was based on knowingly false information.
Did he get the loan?The properties in question weren’t used as collateral.
Before I Retired, I spent many years first as a Real Estate Broker, meaning I owned my office and hired real estate agents. I learned a federal license was in the near future, so I went back to college to get credits to be a Federal licensed appraiser and after that chose to go, using my Brokers license to open offices making loans to customers to use to buy homes. This experience was valuable for this topic for me.The value of anything we own can be subjective as to what it is worth to us vs what it is worth to anybody else. Banks adjust their 'rules' all the time to accommodate a good customer. When we bought our first house in New Mexico we still owned a home with a mortgage in Kansas--it took while to sell that house because of the value we put on it. That meant we didn't quite qualify for the loan on our new home.
The bank made the loan based on our excellent credit rating and our track record that we had been paying that house payment plus rent on our nice apartment for a year with no problem.
I'm sure Deutsche Bank knew Trump was good for the loan and probably did not follow all the rules that would have applied with an unknown borrower. That is neither dishonest or unethical or criminal in any way. It is simply doing business in a way that is win win for everybody., No victims. No harm. Absolutely no reason not to routinely do it.
But who has never sold something that didn't put the highest asking price reasonable on it? Who has ever put up anything for collateral that they didn't value it as much as they reasonably could?
And what bank accepts that collateral knowing that it is worth a fraction of what it actually is even before or without doing an appraisal? Any idiot, for instance, could look at Mar-a-lago and know the worth of that property--structures and land, far exceeded $18 million.
James and the judge engaged in unlawful lawfare for no other reason than to damage President Trump before an election. For that they should go to jail. But if not jail, for sure there should be consequences.
View attachment 1152861
No, not like the collateral. But it still mattered.Not like the collateral. Again, you don't really seem to understand this. The bank knew full well what Trump was worth.
The NY Post is full of shit. Quote from the actual decision and not right wing tabloids.Lol. I'd put the media I read against yours ANYDAY. Here is an example of mine:
He noted it in the decision by did not claim what it was actually worth. He did note the value Trump ascribed assumed that the binding covenant on the property was magically lifted which is a lie.Why did Engoran use a govt estimate (always notoriously low and has NOTHING to do with market value) and not a real appraisal?
Just read the decision.Why don't you link to all the false information you're talking about. And leave MaraLago out. We already know Engoran was a politicized idiot when it came to that.
So, I honestly haven't read the entire thread. In your opinion as a real estate expert, Trump did nothing illegal?Before I Retired, I spent many years first as a Real Estate Broker, meaning I owned my office and hired real estate agents. I learned a federal license was in the near future, so I went back to college to get credits to be a Federal licensed appraiser and after that chose to go, using my Brokers license to open offices making loans to customers to use to buy homes. This experience was valuable for this topic for me.
You are claiming the lender fraudulently approved loans, and the appraisers fraudulently over valued the property. It takes a gutsy appraiser to do that.Trump hired appraisers but replaced their numbers with widely inflated values.
Just one small part of the fraud he perpetrated.
It’s notI wonder how that's even remotely legal.![]()
From what I know, this was a civil, matter not a criminal matter. Civil matters use a very low standard. So, thanks to the Banks testimony, Trump was railroaded. (The bank sided with Trump)So, I honestly haven't read the entire thread. In your opinion as a real estate expert, Trump did nothing illegal?
I don’t have any idea how you could get that from what I posted.You are claiming the lender fraudulently approved loans, and the appraisers fraudulently over valued the property. It takes a gutsy appraiser to do that.
Trump hired appraisers but replaced their numbers with widely inflated values.
Especially when no appraiser and no banker was charged with anything. Banks are generally closed down or taken over when they do that. Not sure what happens to dishonest appraisers but I'm sure there are consequences.You are claiming the lender fraudulently approved loans, and the appraisers fraudulently over valued the property. It takes a gutsy appraiser to do that.
Youi are talking to a clown that doesn't even know what a salary is.You are claiming the lender fraudulently approved loans, and the appraisers fraudulently over valued the property. It takes a gutsy appraiser to do that.
The judge did not make an appraisal for Mar a Lago.It doesn't take a genius to see how other waterfront properties in the area of Mar-a-lago are valued to appreciate how ridiculous the judge was to make his own ridiculously low appraisal of Mar-a-lago with its elaborate structures and 17 acres of land.
Again, your better nature just runs around loose inside you. Good on you.I agree to disagree with you. I know and love too many democrats. I think they're emotional, uninformed, intellectually lazy when it comes to politics and have serious TDS but I don't think they're evil.
Yep, some democrats are, particularly their leaders and some donors.
That was a fascinating link, I appreciate that. I never knew about this. My grandmother was born in Germany and moved here in the 20's. She left 11 siblings there who were put in terrible positions by the Nazis. Most of them died, for one reason or another, because of that.
It’s exactly what you said .I don’t have any idea how you could get that from what I posted.
That very well may be the case. Good call.... But what does Trump have to do with any of that?You are claiming the lender fraudulently approved loans, and the appraisers fraudulently over valued the property. It takes a gutsy appraiser to do that.
Of course he didn, he claimed Trump overvalued it by 2300%...it was one of the most alarming rulings of the caseThe judge did not make an appraisal for Mar a Lago.