Lutecia James won’t stop her vendetta against Trump

Facts don’t matter, so I can say that my salary is going to be $1 million really soon even if it’s only $500,000. So I’m not lying. I’m just saying what my salary is going to be.
Facts do matter and yes you can say whatever you want what your salary “will be”. But that isn’t a fact a fact is what your salary is

A fact is what I value my house at

You really are clueless
 
How did the bank commit fraud? They didn’t create a false statement. Trump did.
Banks have a lot of ways to prevent fraud. Did the bank give Trump the loan? Did Trump pay as agreed? Did the Bank seek charges against Trump?
 
What I was told was it has to align with other properties in the area for square footage and location
If it was owned by a celebrity, that raises the value as well. There are properties in Southern California that have their value inflated by millions of dollars because they were once the homes of celebrities. Say what you will about Trump, but he has been a celebrity for decades.
 
Banks have a lot of ways to prevent fraud. Did the bank give Trump the loan? Did Trump pay as agreed? Did the Bank seek charges against Trump?
None of this has any relevance to the charges.
 
You expect Deutsche Bank to do an independent appraisal of every single property Trump has any ownership in?

That seems really outlandish.
They are going to appraise every single property he is using for collateral for a loan. Big commercial banks have appraisers on staff for that very reason.
 
Facts do matter and yes you can say whatever you want what your salary “will be”. But that isn’t a fact a fact is what your salary is

A fact is what I value my house at

You really are clueless
So you’re saying the numbers have to represent present conditions. Right? You can’t assume things that haven’t occurred.
 
They are going to appraise every single property he is using for collateral for a loan. Big commercial banks have appraisers on staff for that very reason.
The properties in question weren’t used as collateral.
 
The properties that Trump lied about were not being used as collateral.
Then they didn't matter. And I read that the court valued MaraLago at 18 million dollars. That is a monumental joke only a democrat could come up with.

These properties were part of a statement of financial condition.
Which the bank accepted as reasonable. Guessing Trump has a pretty lofty credit rating to go with it.

It was their decision to loan him money based on his financial condition, credit ratings and reputation as well as his collateral.

Why is that any of your business? Or Letitia's?
 
None of this has any relevance to the charges.
So, when the alleged victim testifies, they loved the deal, only the Democrat prosecutors charge means something?

Search Assist

The bank, Deutsche Bank, stated that it followed its own guidelines when approving loans to Donald Trump, which included conducting "sanity checks" on the financial statements he provided. However, they did not conduct full appraisals and sometimes adjusted the values Trump reported, indicating that they viewed the information as subjective and reliant on estimates. PBS Yahoo
 
Then they didn't matter
Of course it did. His statement or financial condition was required by the bank. Obviously it mattered.
And I read that the court valued MaraLago at 18 million dollars. That is a monumental joke only a democrat could come up with.
That’s a lie. You read dishonest media.
Which the bank accepted as reasonable
They assumed it was correct because it is illegal to fabricate the information.
Guessing Trump has a pretty lofty credit rating to go with it.
No idea if that had anything to do with it, but Trump has a history on defaulting. He’s kind of a deadbeat.
was their decision to loan him money based on his financial condition, credit ratings and reputation as well as his collateral.
Their decision was based on knowingly false information. That’s the definition of fraud.
Why is that any of your business? Or Letitia's?
Prosecuting fraud is in the interest of the state.
 
Even in the face of her own obvious mortgage fraud, this DEI attorney general - who has no business being an attorney at all - has just declared she will APPEAL the Appeal Court setting aside her vindictive, insane $500 million fine against Trump. How much more chutpzpah can this woman possibly have? There want even a victim!

She should consider herself lucky that she isn’t being disbarred for her prosecutorial misconduct driven by politics, and instead she is doubling down.

Yup. Aided an abetted by a compromised jury given instructions on what verdict they were to return by a corrupt judge, this woman is corrupt and maliciously vindictive to the core. She used lawfare to get a guilty verdict for a crime no one had ever been charged with, much less convicted of ever. Something every businessman dealing in any kind of real estate does and it is harmless and considered ethical and legal and yes, there are no victims. Even no bankers who were portrayed as victims had any problem with it.

If the woman doesn't wind up in jail, I hope she loses her law license and is disbarred and is never allowed to be a public official of any kind ever again.
 
15th post
Yup. Aided an abetted by a compromised jury given instructions on what verdict they were to return by a corrupt judge, this woman is corrupt and maliciously vindictive to the core. She used lawfare to get a guilty verdict for a crime no one had ever been charged with, much less convicted of ever. Something every businessman dealing in any kind of real estate does and it is harmless and considered ethical and legal and yes, there are no victims. Even no bankers who were portrayed as victims had any problem with it.

If the woman doesn't wind up in jail, I hope she loses her law license and is disbarred and is never allowed to be a public official of any kind ever again.
Agree. She probably won’t end up in jail for fear of another Summer of Love riots, but she SHOULD lose her law license. She also should have to make Trump whole by paying him the lost interest income on his $500 million.
 
That is your 'Better Nature" saying that. Because you're a decent Human Being. Because you were raised right. Because you don't like to have mean thoughts.

You are wrong. dimocraps are the scum of the Earth. They're the Residents of Weimar, the Village outside of Buchenwald who fed and served drinks to the Guards but swore to Gott in Himmel they had no clue what was going on in the Camp...... For 6 years.

dimocrap scum, even the lowest of the low, know exactly and precisely who and what they're voting for.

Here's some dimocraps lining up to vote --

View attachment 1152829
I agree to disagree with you. I know and love too many democrats. I think they're emotional, uninformed, intellectually lazy when it comes to politics and have serious TDS but I don't think they're evil.

Yep, some democrats are, particularly their leaders and some donors.

That was a fascinating link, I appreciate that. I never knew about this. My grandmother was born in Germany and moved here in the 20's. She left 11 siblings there who were put in terrible positions by the Nazis. Most of them died, for one reason or another, because of that.
 
So you’re saying the numbers have to represent present conditions. Right? You can’t assume things that haven’t occurred.
U.S. News

Banker involved in big loans to Trump’s company testifies for his defense in civil fraud trial​

NEW YORK (AP) — When Deutsche Bank loaned Donald Trump’s company hundreds of millions lawyers of dollars, the bank always followed its own guidelines that include checking out information that would-be borrowers provide, an executive testified Tuesday at the former president’s civil fraud trial.

The loans — for projects in Florida, Chicago and Washington, D.C. — are a focus of New York Attorney General Letitia James’ lawsuit contending that Trump and his company deceived lenders and insurers by giving them financial statements that baldly overstated his asset values and overall net worth. The defendants deny the allegations.

Deutsche Bank reviewed the financial statements before making the loans through its department that works with rich individuals — a pathway that allowed for more favorable interest rates than likely available from the commercial real estate division, according to the lawsuit. The deals came with conditions about Trump’s net worth and, sometimes, liquidity, and they often required annual submissions of his financial statements.

The loans were not even in NY.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom