- Thread starter
- #141
Did he not lose to mayor Pete in the Northern States before rebounding in SC?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Looks like Trump will win again.
- Thread starter AzogtheDefiler
- Start date
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 93,057
- 61,105
- 2,645
So? My horoscope once predicted my day, too.He picked Trump the first time too
There are 200 million households. Polls typically cover 800-1500 people. It's not that odd.No one has ever polled me. Oddly.
- Thread starter
- #143
He got 8% in NH. And then fled to SC. Liz Warren was the one who floundered in MA. My own state. As an independent I voted for Bernie just to screw with her.And he did poorly in Iowa and MA too. Correct? He actually finished 4th right? Behind mayor Pete?Down South. He got his clock cleaned in the Northeast.
Let's see...
Connecticut: Biden
Delaware: Biden
DC: Biden
Maine: Biden
Maryland: Biden
Massachusetts: Biden
New Hampshire: Bernie
New Jersey: Biden
New York: Biden
Pennsylvania: Biden
Rhode Island: Biden
Vermont: Bernie
This is what you call Biden getting his clock cleaned? He lost to Bernie Sanders, who is from Vermont, in Vermont and New Hampshire.
No response to this. Good call on your part.
Iowa isn't in the northeast...
He got the most votes in MA...
View attachment 374343
- Thread starter
- #144
So why rely on them? Don’t seem overly accurate?So? My horoscope once predicted my day, too.He picked Trump the first time too
There are 200 million households. Polls typically cover 800-1500 people. It's not that odd.No one has ever polled me. Oddly.
XponentialChaos
Platinum Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 28,159
- 10,257
- 435
Did he not lose to mayor Pete in the Northern States before rebounding in SC?And he did poorly in Iowa and MA too. Correct? He actually finished 4th right? Behind mayor Pete?Down South. He got his clock cleaned in the Northeast.
Let's see...
Connecticut: Biden
Delaware: Biden
DC: Biden
Maine: Biden
Maryland: Biden
Massachusetts: Biden
New Hampshire: Bernie
New Jersey: Biden
New York: Biden
Pennsylvania: Biden
Rhode Island: Biden
Vermont: Bernie
This is what you call Biden getting his clock cleaned? He lost to Bernie Sanders, who is from Vermont, in Vermont and New Hampshire.
No response to this. Good call on your part.
Iowa isn't in the northeast...
He got the most votes in MA...
He didn't lose MA...
How exactly are you claiming that he did poorly in MA when he won MA?
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 93,057
- 61,105
- 2,645
They are as accurate as they are designed to be. And there is no better method of doing them and no better indicator to use..So why rely on them? Don’t seem overly accurate?
XponentialChaos
Platinum Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 28,159
- 10,257
- 435
He got 8% in NH. And then fled to SC. Liz Warren was the one who floundered in MA. My own state. As an independent I voted for Bernie just to screw with her.
Right. Biden won MA. Therefore, he didn't do poorly in MA.
You didn't know who won your own state?
XponentialChaos
Platinum Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 28,159
- 10,257
- 435
And no reason to be a dick. I did Not see your first response. All you Leftists are such asshats.
No reason to get defensive. You claimed that Biden got his clock cleaned in the northeast. As I showed you, that's simply not the case.
Connecticut: Biden
Delaware: Biden
DC: Biden
Maine: Biden
Maryland: Biden
Massachusetts: Biden
New Hampshire: Bernie
New Jersey: Biden
New York: Biden
Pennsylvania: Biden
Rhode Island: Biden
Vermont: Bernie
You were wrong. It happens.
- Sep 9, 2012
- 40,718
- 13,425
- 2,280
Actually he means something isn’t right with the polling, thus squishy. Just as we have said. And miraculously the polls have quit sharing demo info with the public anymore, when it was easy to see how their numbers were skewed and people mentioned it. He probably sees more than we do.WAIT....WAIT.....
O/P'S source is a guy who is saying the polls are squishy, referring to them as his basis for outcome.
I thought you guys kept saying the polls meant nothing because of 2016.
Can't have it both ways, TrumpTards.
WTH_Progs?
Diamond Member
- Feb 19, 2019
- 12,229
- 10,320
- 2,140
Gundlach, who called Trump's 2016 election, predicts he'll win again
The billionaire bond investor thinks the polls are "very, very squishy."www.yahoo.com
Would not shock me since Biden is senile and Harris is not well liked (HRC 2.0).
Who am I to argue with the experts?
"I think polls are very, very squishy right now because of the highly toxic political environment in which we live," Gundlach said. Gundlach said he’s come across data suggesting that about "two-thirds of conservatives or moderate conservatives say that they have lied about their support for Donald Trump either directly or by omission."
No surprise. Trump's one of the GOATS with an asterisk because he has a big mouth. As for his competition, they aint.
- Thread starter
- #151
My bad. Liz Warren did poorly in MA and she is from MA. He did poorly in NH and fled. 8%Did he not lose to mayor Pete in the Northern States before rebounding in SC?And he did poorly in Iowa and MA too. Correct? He actually finished 4th right? Behind mayor Pete?Down South. He got his clock cleaned in the Northeast.
Let's see...
Connecticut: Biden
Delaware: Biden
DC: Biden
Maine: Biden
Maryland: Biden
Massachusetts: Biden
New Hampshire: Bernie
New Jersey: Biden
New York: Biden
Pennsylvania: Biden
Rhode Island: Biden
Vermont: Bernie
This is what you call Biden getting his clock cleaned? He lost to Bernie Sanders, who is from Vermont, in Vermont and New Hampshire.
No response to this. Good call on your part.
Iowa isn't in the northeast...
He got the most votes in MA...
He didn't lose MA...
How exactly are you claiming that he did poorly in MA when he won MA?
- Thread starter
- #152
Eh? Sometimes you just have to feel the mood of the country.They are as accurate as they are designed to be. And there is no better method of doing them and no better indicator to use..So why rely on them? Don’t seem overly accurate?
- Thread starter
- #153
No. Didn’t care either. I am not a Democrat. I just wanted to make sure Warren lost. I thought Sanders had won. Happens.He got 8% in NH. And then fled to SC. Liz Warren was the one who floundered in MA. My own state. As an independent I voted for Bernie just to screw with her.
Right. Biden won MA. Therefore, he didn't do poorly in MA.
You didn't know who won your own state?
- Thread starter
- #154
He was close to dropping out post NH. Then he went South and rebounded.And no reason to be a dick. I did Not see your first response. All you Leftists are such asshats.
No reason to get defensive. You claimed that Biden got his clock cleaned in the northeast. As I showed you, that's simply not the case.
Connecticut: Biden
Delaware: Biden
DC: Biden
Maine: Biden
Maryland: Biden
Massachusetts: Biden
New Hampshire: Bernie
New Jersey: Biden
New York: Biden
Pennsylvania: Biden
Rhode Island: Biden
Vermont: Bernie
You were wrong. It happens.
toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
Gundlach, who called Trump's 2016 election, predicts he'll win again
The billionaire bond investor thinks the polls are "very, very squishy."
Would not shock me since Biden is senile and Harris is not well liked (HRC 2.0).
Who am I to argue with the experts?
"I think polls are very, very squishy right now because of the highly toxic political environment in which we live," Gundlach said. Gundlach said he’s come across data suggesting that about "two-thirds of conservatives or moderate conservatives say that they have lied about their support for Donald Trump either directly or by omission."
View attachment 374209
XponentialChaos
Platinum Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 28,159
- 10,257
- 435
My bad. Liz Warren did poorly in MA and she is from MA. He did poorly in NH and fled. 8%
The irony here is that we were discussing Biden's possible dementia.
And in that discussion to make your point, you've made the claim that Biden did poorly in the northeast and that Biden did poorly in Massachusetts, your home state.
Not to mention your bringing up of Iowa when we're talking about the northeast and your claim that Bush won Pennsylvania in 2000.
Wrong statements all over the place. Maybe you should have yourself checked.
Kidding.
Today's Reuters/Ipsos poll, prior to the Harris bump, has it at Biden +11
That rises to +16 if undecideds are forced to make a choice. Undecideds are breaking heavily for Biden this time, the opposite of how things went in 2016.
That rises to +16 if undecideds are forced to make a choice. Undecideds are breaking heavily for Biden this time, the opposite of how things went in 2016.
- Thread starter
- #158
Mistakes happen. It was a while back. I am not a political science expert.My bad. Liz Warren did poorly in MA and she is from MA. He did poorly in NH and fled. 8%
The irony here is that we were discussing Biden's possible dementia.
And in that discussion to make your point, you've made the claim that Biden did poorly in the northeast and that Biden did poorly in Massachusetts, your home state.
Not to mention your bringing up of Iowa when we're talking about the northeast and your claim that Bush won Pennsylvania in 2000.
Wrong statements all over the place. Maybe you should have yourself checked.
Kidding.
I was not the only one thinking he choked.
Drop out, Joe Biden. New Hampshire proves you are done.
Biden flopped disastrously in Iowa and New Hampshire. If he wants to keep Bernie Sanders from the nomination, he should pull the plug on his 2020 run.
www.businessinsider.com
- Thread starter
- #159
Today's Reuters/Ipsos poll, prior to the Harris bump, has it at Biden +11
That rises to +16 if undecideds are forced to make a choice. Undecideds are breaking heavily for Biden this time, the opposite of how things went in 2016.
This again
toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
Today's Reuters/Ipsos poll, prior to the Harris bump, has it at Biden +11
That rises to +16 if undecideds are forced to make a choice. Undecideds are breaking heavily for Biden this time, the opposite of how things went in 2016.
This again
Hell, when I joined here in 2017, people here were swearing he would never make it through that year!
Similar threads
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 57
- Views
- 910
- Replies
- 18
- Views
- 1K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 21
- Views
- 223
- Replies
- 365
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 37
- Views
- 528
- Replies
- 15
- Views
- 133
- Replies
- 23
- Views
- 233
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8094
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-