Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
She blew up her own campaign. Comey was obligated to give an accounting of the additional evidence he uncovered. Do you actually condone him covering it up? You just admit that you condone corruption for the sake of your filthy party.They must not have had reason to raid like they did for trump. And Comey absolutely blew up her campaign. If there was reason to prosecute then Trumps newly appointed team had 4 years to do so. They didn't. You’re full of shit
Obviously not30,0000 deleted pieces of evidence was more than enough to raid the murderous lying bitch's house.
No they couldn't. Sessions recused himself, remember? Who the fuck is Rosie? Barr couldn't do it 3 years after the fact.Sessions, Rosie or Barr could have prosecuted any of these law breakers y’all accuse of getting away with crimes. They didn’t because your claims do not have legal standing. You’ve been brain washed
It obviously was. It's obvious that Comey is corrupt.Obviously not
Comey was not obligated to do that presser. He was obligated to report his finishing to the DOJ and the DOJ could decide whether to prosecute or not. Comets actions were unprecedented. I actually don’t have a problem with it though as I’m all for transparency when possible. I respect what Comey did. But you’re lying if you don’t think that blew up her campaignShe blew up her own campaign. Comey was obligated to give an accounting of the additional evidence he uncovered. Do you actually condone him covering it up? You just admit that you condone corruption for the sake of your filthy party.
Any reasonable prosecutor would think so and have raided the home, just like they did Roger Stone and Manafort.Obviously not
Sessions recused from the Russia investigation not from Clinton…. Rosenbaum is RosieNo they couldn't. Sessions recused himself, remember? Who the fuck is Rosie? Barr couldn't do it 3 years after the fact.
Obviously not… including Trumps people who didn’t prosecuteAny reasonable prosecutor would think so.
Maybe they actually have class, morals and a sense of fair play.Obviously not… including Trumps people who didn’t prosecute
Since when do class and morals let criminals off the hook? What are you talking about?!Maybe they actually have class, morals and a sense of fair play.
Suckers. The left don't care about rules or morals or fair play or even The Law or Due Process.
Bet he does not make that mistake again.
Lefty does it every day all day, but they have no morals.Since when do class and morals let criminals off the hook? What are you talking about?!
What about letting crooks off the hook is moral? Do you even know what you’re saying?Lefty does it every day all day, but they have no morals.
Why are lefty prosecutors letting criminals run loose in the streets?What about letting crooks off the hook is moral? Do you even know what you’re saying?
I don’t know, ask whomever it is you’re talking about that question. Doesn’t have anything to do with our conversation. Why can’t you answer my questions?Why are lefty prosecutors letting criminals run loose in the streets?
The thought of America being brought down by misguided, manipulated, mal-informed rage and paranoia is difficult to swallow.
That's the problem. It's not about one guy. It never has been.
Sure it does. You asked why is being soft on criminals moral, implying that it is immoral. Then I pointed out that numerous Lefty Prosecutors and Judges continually release blood thirsty savages into our streets and neighborhoods because of some perceived imaginary injustice that is based on lies like everything The Left has to sell....is based on lies.I don’t know, ask whomever it is you’re talking about that question. Doesn’t have anything to do with our conversation. Why can’t you answer my questions?
So what exactly are you saying. Is being soft in crime and letting crooks off moral or immoral? What’s your position cause right now you're speaking out of both endsSure it does. You asked why is being soft on criminals moral, implying that it is immoral. Then I pointed out that numerous Lefty Prosecutors and Judges continually release blood thirsty savages into our streets and neighborhoods because of some perceived imaginary injustice that is based on lies like everything The Left has to sell....is based on lies.
There is no injustice in America. If there were, then why is America home to the most minority millionaires and billionaires vs the entire world? How can a black man be President or become a Millionaire in an unjust and unfair system?
The only injustice in America is now coming from our own Government when they weaponize it's apparatus against it's political rivals who dare resist "The Fundamental Transformation of America"
Structural Change, or Fundamental Transformation of America are just code words for tearing it all down, destroying our history and culture so that it can be replaced with a Globalist Fascist Borderless State.
That's what they want?
Is that what you want?
We were told the Patriot Act will not be used against citizens for political purposes. It's bad enough as it is. The Biden administration that the middle class will not face more audits with the massive IRS expansion in the joke called Inflation Reduction Act. We are lied to all the time. Lie after lie after lie.So what exactly are you saying. Is being soft in crime and letting crooks off moral or immoral? What’s your position cause right now you're speaking out of both ends
Well good. I’m glad to see you people finally speak up about being lied too. How y’all IGNORED trumps lies for years baffles meWe were told the Patriot Act will not be used against citizens for political purposes. It's bad enough as it is. The Biden administration that the middle class will not face more audits with the massive IRS expansion in the joke called Inflation Reduction Act. We are lied to all the time. Lie after lie after lie.
