So I'm watching this hearing and I'm so baffled by this line that both accused and accuser have been treated badly. One accuses the other of sexual assault. Doesn't that mean that 1 of them deserves repercussions? One of them have to be lying. Seems like such an inane statement.
Word .
One of them is guilty of perjury. Or bat shit crazy . Or both!
I would argue that it’s the one who testified that loud, aggressive drunks snuck up on her from behind. And whose friends and witnesses said it never happened
Friends that have reason to lie about this. Not for nothing. Not one of the members of the GOP dares to claim they don't believe Ford. The best that they can do is that they don't know. If I conduct a job interview and I have reason to believe the person I'm interviewing committed sexual assault, I'm picking somebody else. If that's true for a regular job interview, why pray tell should that NOT be true for a position on the supreme court? Can you answer that question?
Her best friend at the time who she said was there swore a statement under oath that she has never met Kavanaugh or been to a party with him.
What was her reason to lie?
We have absolutely zero reason to believe he committed sexual assault